Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have any black voters withdrawn support of Dean since debate revelation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 11:56 AM
Original message
Have any black voters withdrawn support of Dean since debate revelation?
If this voter's decision is any indication, the Sharpton-Dean exchange is affecting African-American support of Dean in Iowa:

Bobbretta Brewton, a social services executive, says Howard Dean had her support, but not anymore, especially after this exchange in Sunday's debate.

"I took him off my shopping list, because race is important and it needs to be addressed. And I was pleased that Al Sharpton continued until he actually had to admit that he didn't have a diverse key Cabinet."

Transcript available at: http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0401/12/pzn.00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who knows?
Great way to re-introduce this subject for the umpteenth time, though... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure, we can generalize all you want.
dead horse, meet stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. hahahahahahaha... great minds and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mississippi Congressman Bennie Thompson
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM by HFishbine
See things a little differently.

http://www.blogforamerica.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Wish Bennie would have supported our former Democratic Governor more
then we wouldn't be swearing in Haley Barbour in Mississippi today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Six members of the Black congressional Caucus
also know a winner when they see one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. And 32 have not endorsed him.
So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. That's because they're not representative of the black point of view
don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I gotcha
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
49. Who have they endorsed?
I'll be able to tell you when I get home from school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dead horse meet jchild....
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM by TLM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shocking revelation!
The population of Vermont is nearly all white!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. If the population of Dean 6 person cabinet were to represent vermont...

they'd have a fraction of a black guy. The state is 98%.


I love the idea that opportunistic attackers of Dean use... that Dean should have scoured the nation to find someone to hire based only on their race.

These folks are actually resorting to acting like Dean should have discriminated based on race, in order to make some token appointment of a minority.

It is not like there was a line of black and Latino folks trying to get on Dean's cabinet, but were being rejected due to discriminatory hiring practices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Why are you so eager to round the number of blacks DOWN
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:08 PM by beaconess
to require zero representation rather than round the number UP to enable ONE WHOLE minority person to serve in the cabinet?

Or to put it another way, in order to exactly reflect the state's racial demographics, there would have had to be five whole white people plus a fraction of a white person. So why is it ok to count that fraction as a whole white person thereby allowing whites to be overrepresented in the cabinet but not ok to count that fraction as a black person because it would result in blacks being overrepresented?

Moreover, we're not talking about only six cabinet appointments. Dean made more than 30 cabinet appointments during his tenure as governor, so one black person would not have broken the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Excellent point, beaconess...
30 appointments and not a single AFrican American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. that's 6 appointments over 5 terms....


he appointed the SAME people over and over again each term. Saying he had 30 appointments is like saying Clinton had two vice presidents.


Wow some folks are really trying hard to misrepresent the facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. 30 cabinet appointments, ~~~~WHITES ONLY~~~~
Not one black OR brown. Don't forget browns.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. Oh GOD!!! SWEATER AND BABY PHOTO!!!
Those image guys have been working overtime!! Where's that army uniform photo? DIdn't poll well with chicks?? hee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Check your facts... Dean had almost no rollover in his cabinet.


The same folks were appointed again and again each term.

"Or to put it another way, in order to exactly reflect the state's racial demographics, there would have had to be five whole white people plus a fraction of a white person."

Well there would be 5 white guys and 1 guy who was about 90% white and the remaining 10% divided between blacks, Latinos, and native Americans.

I understand that Dean opponents are desperate at this point and frankly I expect they'll be attacking him soon for not having more blacks and Latinos in his family.

And perhaps you missed the article about Dean trying to recruit some minority folks and then not being interested because they had better paying jobs elsewhere?

Can you please point out to me the black or Latino person(s) who was/were trying to get on Dean's cabinet but was/were rejected based on their race?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. OMG, TLM, I think I'll faint now!
We actually AGREED on something! ROTFL

I brought that up in a thread from yesterday...I've never seen a large turnover in incumbent cabinet personnel. It would just be incredibly stupid unless you have a major demographics change and need to make sure you have the pulse of the group that has increased dramatically. Beyond that it's pointless to replace people you know are loyal, trustworthy, knowledgable and able to work together.

You could actually take it a step further and say ok, of the percentage of minorities living in Vermont, just how many of them are qualified for cabinet positions AND applying for them? How many minority folks sought out Gov. Dean during his campaigns and said "I'd like to be considered if you have an opening on your Cabinet."?

Detractors are essentially saying Dean himself is solely responsible for hiring a minority onto his cabinet when the very real possibility is that no minority person ever wanted to join his cabinet. That being the case they claim he should have looked out of State- well WTF for? He's not duty-bound to hire an out-of-State minority person when he has qualified people in the State he's Governing. Maybe to him State residency was more important than skin color. Yeah, now there's discrimination, a Governor focusing on the State he Governs.*sarcasm*:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:10 PM
Original message
You have to love the irony.... this attack is about discriminatory hiring


or at least that's the attempt being made, to imply Dean would only hire whites.

Yet nobody can point to someone who was rejected based on race... in fact just the opposite, they went looking for minority appointments and the candidates for the position did not want it.

I think the miss the point of the whole idea of equality in hiring practices... if the black dude doesn't get the job because he's got a better paying job elsewhere and declines the position... that's not discrimination on the part of the employer. I think most minority folks would agree, that the real problem in hiring is being unable to get a job because of your race... it's not having to choose between multiple jobs and select the best paying one.

However the argument, supposedly against discrimination based on race in hiring, is that Dean should have discriminated based on race in hiring by only hiring a minority person, even if it meant going out of state to find someone to sit on the state government... that's just dumb.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. This clearly demonstrates that there is support for Al's query,
and a rejection, by some, of Gov. Deans response. Hard to call her names and question her motives, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. LOL! So the opinions of one black person represents all?


Sad how some folks will spew racist stereotyping and encourage racial discrimination in hiring... all to attack Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. your response is a tactic
to make it appear that I was racially stereotyping this individual as speaking for all blacks or encouraging racial discrimination in hiring.

a rejection, "by some" is what I wrote.

Can you make a post without insulting someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. LOL! This whole desperate attack is a tactic...

And trying to present one black person's opinion of Dean as if it is representative of all black folks or a trend in the black community, is stereotyping.

Some folks hate Dean so much they'll stereotype black folks and try to prop up this BS attack on Dean, even after Sharpton is backing off of it.

It is clear that for some the issue of sterotyping, discrimination, and equality all take a back seat to a good race baiting attack on Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Of course it doesn't
and I hope you remember that the next time a Dean supporter trots out some black person who is quoted somewhere as justification for a point they're trying to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. The endorsements people trot out for Dean...


are not the same as one person's opinion... as the whole point of endorsements is that those making them do carry with them the support of others.

I think Jesse Jackson Jr. endorsement means a lot more than some woman at a mall who says she's not shopping for Dean anymore.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Really??? How elitist of you. That social worker's vote is actually MORE
important than Jackson's, seeing as he CAN'T even vote in Iowa!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I said nothing about votes...


I said endorsements. And someone like Jackson Jr. carries more weight and influence than some average person.

It is not elitist at all to say that more people follow Jackson and are influenced by his support than follow this lady and are influenced by her lack of support.

But again, nice tactic to try misrepresenting my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think so in the primaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. she didn't necessarily support him to begin with
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 12:03 PM by dave29
as you asserted she did by asking if people were "withdrawing" their support. She just said she took him off her shopping list. If anything, the unfounded attack may hurt him with some undecideds whom are not informed of Dean's record and position on equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Uh, no, she said she DID support him, but not anymore. Read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. You don't understand - she doesn't worship at the Dean altar
and therefore, her opinion is either 1) irrelevant; 2) misguided; or 3) part of a concerted effort to damage Dr. Dean.

Of course, if she had praised Dean, she would be held up as the paragon of black political thought in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Again, another excellent point.
And, a belated welcome to DU to you, beaconess. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
54. And we know she's not lying because?


It sure wouldn't be the first time a Dean opponent lied and pretended to be a defecting supporter for a lame gotcha attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. So, you don't believe that anyone has actually defected from Dean
and that anyone who says they have should be suspected of lying? Shame on you for making such an insinuation based upon nothing more than the fact that this woman has problems with your candidate.

It's amazing the lengths you guys are going to perpetuate the myth that your candidate is infallible.

I have a clue for you - everyone who opposes Dean or even says they changed their mind about him is not delusional, a liar or an idiot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good to see that Dean's Supporters care as much about race
as he does. (scarcasm) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Good to see that Clark's Supporters care as much about race baiting


as he does. (scarcasm) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
63. Oh stop it!
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 02:36 PM by diamondsoul
The argument presented is that Dean should have used descriminatory hiring no matter which way you slice it. Either he hired an underqualified Vermont Resident based SOLELY on race** assuming any minority people ever even applied for a position which so far I've not seen proof of.**, or he went looking for an qaulified minority individual out of State and blew off qualified white, Vermont resident applicants based again SOLELY ON RACE!

Racism is NOT ok with me, no matter which way it goes!

**edited to clarify a point about applicants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
70. Oh, please, Xultar
That's totally, TOTALLY unfair to Dean.

Would you care to see a little more about his real record? I don't care if you don't support him (for whatever reason, or none at all), but I do care that he is being unfairly maligned. Readd it if you dare. It's a MUCH more comprehensive and therefore fair look at his record:

Leaders: Dean Tried to Appoint Minorities
http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-democrats-minorities,0,1698744.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does the Black Caucus Conduct Polls?
it would be a better way to determine this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. No no no... don;t pay attention to the massive support Dean has


from minority communities based on his policy and great record on minority issues... no pay attention to one person who bought Sharpton's BS attack that Dean is bad on race because he did not have a black person in the 6 person cabinet in his state. Or ignore the fact he hired more women than any Vermont gov ever or that his staff did have minority members, just not in the 6 cabinet positions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Dean has more support from the CBC then any other candidate.
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:22 PM by mzmolly
There's your poll.

There is also your *motive* for Mr. Sharptons grandstanding. Sour grapes over Jesse Jackson Jr. and other endorsements from the CBC for Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
56. SHHhhhhhhhhhh! No black people hate Dean....


they hate the fact that he had 6 people working for him who weren't black.... nevermind the fact he offered positions to folks of color who rejected them to take higher paying jobs... nevermind the policy positions or the fact that the rest of Dean's staff did have lots of minorities... nevermind the fact the guy had more women working for his administration than any vermont gov before him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. And lots of us hate the fact that so many Dean supporters
say the kind of crap that you keep posting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toot Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. I didn't and I'm black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. welcome to DU, Toot!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Welcome toot!
:toast: :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. *
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:17 PM by mzmolly
dup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
31.  welcome to DU, Toot!
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:17 PM by bigtree
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toot Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Thanks for the welcome. It's very interesting here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. 1. According the AP Dean made every effort to have a diverse cabinet
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:12 PM by mzmolly
http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-democrats-minorities,0,1698744.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

2. Dean is gaining in the Iowa Polls.

3. I saw Sheila Jackson Lee defend Dean on Faux news just yesterday. She is apparently still *supporting* Dean.

Along with these people:

http://www.blacksfordean.com/endorsements.htm

In fact, he gained another endorsement from a member of the CBC because she herself was fed up with the bullshit.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. Has Clark attracted anymore women voters since he donned
the comfy, casual look of Mr Rogers and started his chatty "Conversations with Clark" performances?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Uh, yeah, he has...
he swayed me. His complete, unswaying support of women's control of their own fertility did it for me.

Why are you trying to change the subject at hand? Nothing to say about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Apparently his support for womens choice was not so fervent when he
supported Reagan/Bush 1 ? Glad he's come around in time for the election. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. And he didn't kinda come around...he came around BIG TIME!
But of course you have NO IDEA what his stance on choice was in 84, do you?

Why are you stearing the discussion toward Clark and away from the topic at hand? LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. YIPPY SKIPPY!
;)

I can only surmise that he was not as concerned as I was in 84 because he cast his vote for Reagan.

I'm not trying to trash your candidate here. Just pointing out the differences.

GO DEAN!! Jchild, I predict you'll come around to Dean sometime soon. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. The only way I would even consider Dean is if he were the Dem nominee
but since that won't happen, your prediction is moot.

Clark is honest about his past. Wish YOUR candidate was! He can keep his records sealed, but the truth does have a way of coming out, does it not? :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. is he?
What's he had to say about getting fired from his General's job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Ah, I love it when you guys hate him for his career in the military and
in the same breath condemn him for leaving the military.

Good job hijacking this thread. Now if you would care to address the topic at hand or start your own thread, I will respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. I notice
that you aren't answering the question. I don't mean to hijack your thread - but you're shooting yourself in the foot, because now I can mention how very eager you are to hold Dean accountable for every little accusation that may or may not even be true, and how very eager you are to avoid the known truths of the General's past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. Voting for Reagan
and Bush1 would indicate that his concern for women's reproductive rights were minimal, if they existed at all. I'm amazed at the level of denial that so many Clark supporters are able to embrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Or maybe it shows that he wasn't a single-issue voter.
Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. your manners
are less than stellar, jchild. Feel free to atttempt to justify what is so blatantly obvious. This much touted concern for women's reproductive rights is a recent development, a sleazy attempt at pandering to women voters. If this had been an important issue to him all along, he'd NEVER have voted for either Reagan or Bush1.

It shows he was a Republican voter, with Republican concerns - and the oppression of women was just fine with him.

Denial - it's so humorous to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. Do you think many would admit it here? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. The debate revelation when Carol Mosely Braun slapped
the clown, Sharpton, down?


Do you think Blark's breathless fans will head for the hills when the questions of his political allegiance, his record of praising Bush and his coherts are repeated endlessly along with the circumstances of his retirement and relationaship with unsavory war criminal types?

Just preparing you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. not if they come in the form of this insulting smear of Rev. Sharpton
How about a post that doesn't insult? Your insults obscure your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Is that you, Al?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
57. I hate when people assume what Black voters think.
It always amazes me, that even in this century, people still think that all black voters care about is being black. They DO have other things to worry about.. like jobs, health care, schools, war, pollution, etc. If someone was REALLY swayed by a comment Sharpton made, and they didn't take the time to dig deeper into the issue (if it's that important), then their support was weak to begin with. You minimize voters of any group when you reduce them to single issue voters. It's a way to divide America, and continue to exclude black voters from the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. No one is assuming what minorities think. This is a QUOTATION
There is quite a difference in a quotation and an assumption, right? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. Well said, race baiting is terrible
Race baiting is as low as the Bush war=patriotism litmus test. What Sharpton did was opportunistic and I'm applauded with Glee when CMB slapped him down for it.


Images from Dean Rocks the House of Blues, Hollywood
From wtmusic http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=919849
From Joefree1 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=921300

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
58. I hate when people minimize black voters!!!
It always amazes me, that even in this century, people still think that all black voters care about is being black. They DO have other things to worry about.. like jobs, health care, schools, war, pollution, etc. If someone was REALLY swayed by a comment Sharpton made, and they didn't take the time to dig deeper into the issue (if it's that important), then their support was weak to begin with. You minimize voters of any group when you reduce them to single issue voters. It's a way to divide America, and continue to exclude black voters from the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
72. Dean may lose even more if what Hannity said today is true...
On Hannity's radio show he said that Vermont did not make Martin Luther King, Jr's birthday a state holiday until 2001. According to Hannity the state legislature took up the initiative to make it a holiday in 2001.

I don't know if it is true or not, but if it is, Dean is indeed the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. And for the potential flame throwers, MLK'a birthday is not intended to be a "black" holiday. It is intended to celebrate an "American" civil rights leader. Not a "black" civil rights leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Kahuna, this needs its own thread
because it is INDEED TRUE. My god, Mississippi has had the MLK state holiday for almost twenty years, a paid day off! And Dean fought it in Vermont. This is HUGE.

Here's a link. Break it in its own thread if you like--it deserves its own thread.

http://www.rutlandherald.com/legislature/leg2000/mlking.html

"I think it's hypocritical for Vermont to say we value diversity and we have a state holiday on Martin Luther King's birthday when we really don't have a state holiday and all state offices are open," Spaulding said. "The state ought to demonstrate leadership and show by example that we're serious about diversity and the memory of Martin Luther King."

The Senate Government Operations Committee agreed with Spaulding, but agreed to hold off on legislation to give the Vermont State Employees Association and the Dean administration time to try to work out a deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Yep it's true alright. But I won't start a thread..
lest I'm accused of accusing Dean of being a racist because he likes to quote Dr. King, but not make his holiday a state holiday like we've had in NJ for ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
73. bet a lot of undecideds are re-thinking
no matter what race they may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC