Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the Kerry campaign NEEDS to do.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:46 AM
Original message
What the Kerry campaign NEEDS to do.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 06:45 AM by fishface
Bush is hammering the Mass.,New Hampshire.Vermont area with one of his "Kerry and his liberal allies in Congress" TV ads about how weak they are on terror and I'm sure it'll make some of the sheep in those areas decide to vote for the village idiot.

Kerry needs to have a counter ad that tells how Bush cut the FBI's counterterror funding by 2/3rds AFTER 9/11

FBI Budget Squeezed After 9/11
Request for New Counterterror Funds Cut by Two-Thirds

By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, March 22, 2004; Page A06

In the early days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the Bush White House cut by nearly two-thirds an emergency request for counterterrorism funds by the FBI, an internal administration budget document shows.

The document, dated Oct. 12, 2001, shows that the FBI requested $1.5 billion in additional funds to enhance its counterterrorism efforts with the creation of 2,024 positions. But the White House Office of Management and Budget cut that request to $531 million. Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, working within the White House limits, cut the FBI's request for items such as computer networking and foreign language intercepts by half, cut a cyber-security request by three quarters and eliminated entirely a request for "collaborative capabilities."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A13541-2004Mar21¬Found=true

---------------------
and also highlighting how many career anti-terror experts have quit smirks administration in frustration at the terrible way he's going after terrorists.

U.S. Terrorism Policy Spawns Steady Staff Exodus
Wed Apr 7, 7:45 PM ET Add Politics - Reuters to My Yahoo!


By Caroline Drees, Security Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has faced a steady exodus of counterterrorism officials, many disappointed by a preoccupation with Iraq (news - web sites) they said undermined the U.S. fight against terrorism.



Former counterterrorism officials said at least half a dozen have left the White House Office for Combating Terrorism or related agencies in frustration in the 2 1/2 years since the attacks.


Some also left because they felt President Bush (news - web sites) had sidelined his counterterrorism experts and paid almost exclusive heed to the vice president, the defense secretary and other Cabinet members in planning the "war on terror," former counterterrorism officials said.


"I'm kind of hoping for regime change," one official who quit told Reuters.

<snip>

Similar charges were made by Bush's former counterterrorism czar, Richard Clarke, who told the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that the administration ignored the al Qaeda threat beforehand and was fixated on Iraq afterward. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) testifies before the 9/11 panel on Thursday.

<snip>

"HIGH TURNOVER


Roger Cressey, who served under Clarke in the White House counterterrorism office, said: "Dick accurately reflects the frustration of many in the counterterrorism community in getting the new administration to take the al Qaeda issue seriously."


Cressey left the office in November 2001, when he became chief of staff of the White House's cybersecurity office until September 2002.


The attrition among all levels of the Office for Combating Terrorism began shortly after the attacks and continued into this year. At least eight officials in the office -- which numbers a dozen people -- have left and been replaced since 9/11. Several of the officials were contacted by Reuters.


The office has been run by four different people since the attacks, and at least three have held the No. 2 slot.

<snip>
Rand Beers, a former No. 2 in the office who quit last year over the administration's handling of the war on terrorism, told Reuters the turnover had been "unusually high" since the hijacked airliner attacks in New York and Washington.


"And one of the reasons is frustration with the way counterterrorism policy has been conducted, including the focus on Iraq," said Beers, who now serves as a foreign policy adviser for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites), who hopes to unseat Bush in November.


<snip>

"There's a problem of too few counterterrorism staffers to begin with ... and with the focus on any big issue like Iraq, it is a distraction from the overall counterterrorism effort," the official said.

(the link to this story is no longer active )

There's a wealth of examples of Bush's incompetence like this that needs to be put out there for the idiots that 'think' Bush is doing a wonderful job of keeping us safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. it never ceases to amaze me that people don't ask How? or Why?
when BushCo claims we are safer. It seems like a natural question to ask What have you done? What are you doing right now to make us safer? This claim is swallowed whole. And people just parrot the line "I feel so SAFE with this president".

It doesn't just amaze me, it fucking APPALLS me that the claim goes unchallenged. Kerry pointed it out in the debates, by bringing our attention to the unsecured ports, and the unexamined airplane cargo, but that very real information just sort of melted away.

It is their central claim, that Bush is a leader in the so-called War on Terror.

How? What has he done? What is he doing right now? Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timezoned Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's even simpler than all of that
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 06:41 AM by timezoned
we're less safe because the entire goddamn world's opinion has gone against us. If anyone imagines this is making anyone safer they've gone around the bend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. i'm more concerned that bush tried cutting funds to nunn-lugar
that program was attacked by bush in spring of 2001 and he attempted to cut most of the funding, tens of millions of dollars, from this program that were used to dismantle safely ex-soviet nukes and pay ex-soviet nuclear scientists so they would not ply their trade on the open market to terrorists.

that alone proved to dick lugar (R-IN) bush is a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. fishface
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It was a Rueters story from Yahoo and the link no longer works.


I can pair it down if you wish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC