Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

freeping rightwingnuts are Tora Bora stoopid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:47 PM
Original message
freeping rightwingnuts are Tora Bora stoopid
bush's Pentagon:

U.S. Officials Believe bin Laden is in Tora Bora
Aired December 15, 2001

http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/15/cst.08.html

Washington Post article from April 17, 2002:

The Bush administration has concluded that Osama bin Laden was present during the battle for Tora Bora late last year and that failure to commit U.S. ground troops to hunt him was its gravest error in the war against al Qaeda, according to civilian and military officials with first-hand knowledge.

After-action reviews, conducted privately inside and outside the military chain of command, describe the episode as a significant defeat for the United States.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62618-2002Apr16¬Found=true

Al Qaeda expert, author, and CNN contributor Peter Bergen:

There is no debating the fact that US "outsourced" the Tora Bora operation to local Afghan warlords.

Sen. Kerry's charge that Tora Bora was a missed opportunity to bring bin Laden to justice isn't "garbage", but an accurate reflection of the historical record.

http://www.peterbergen.com/clients/PeterBergen/pbergen.nsf/Web00002Show?OpenForm&ParentUNID=D8B946D6FD3B25AC85256F34006138CD

As for the freeping silly rightwingnuts accusing Kerry of being "for" outsourcing to Afghan warlords, let's look at the ENTIRE transcript relevant to the actual question Kerry was responding to;

KING: Mount Holly Springs, Pennsylvania—hello.

CALLER: Hello. Yes, I would like to ask the panel why they don’t use napalm or flamethrowers on those tunnels and caves up there in Afghanistan?

KING: Senator Kerry?

CALLER: My golly, I think they could smoke him out.

KING: Senator Kerry?

KERRY: Well, I think it depends on where you are tactically. They may well be doing that at some point in time. But for the moment, what we are doing, I think, is having its impact and it is the best way to protect our troops and sort of minimalize the proximity, if you will. I think we have been doing this pretty effectively and we should continue to do it that way.

KING: Congressman Cunningham, what do you think of that question?

CUNNINGHAM: I think Senator Kerry is right on the mark. To use a flamethrower, you’ve got to get right into the area close in. And plus, it doesn’t penetrate that deep in those tunnels. You’ve got to go in there after him. So I think you have to neutralize that threat. And then you can get him out in a lot of different, various ways including what the gentleman spoke about.

http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/14/lkl.00.html

FLAME THROWERS; nothing whatsoever to do with outsourcing to warlords.

Kerry, on bush's outsourcing to warlords, September 2002:

"They let him go," he says. "It's disgraceful."

Swearing softly as we slow through a construction zone, Kerry tells me, by way of explanation, "I've been saying this privately for months now, and my staff at times has had to restrain me. They talk tough, but it's a risk-averse strategy. Bush gets daily briefings, for God's sake. He should be saying, 'Do we need more troops there, here, where? Do we need more firepower?' " He gazes out the car window as the Capitol comes into view. "Osama bin Laden got away," he says glumly. Pause. "You'd think they've learned some lessons in Vietnam."

http://web.archive.org/web/20020910104925/www.johnkerry.com/site/PageServer?pagename=news_2002_0827a

If anyone find more links, such as McCain commenting in 2001 about bush's outsourcing OBL in Tora Bora to Afghan warlords (he said this on a TV interview, not sure which one) etc please add here if you would. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Leave no DUMBASS behind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. How could Bush learn from 'Nam? He wasn't there. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is so easily debunkable it's amusing
And quite telling too... they're so obviously grasping at straws now.

Hey lurking Freepers - ever think about running on YOUR GUY'S RECORD? Nope, can't do that can you, it's a surefire way to lose.

I did see a funny over there. There is some speculation that the October Surprise will be that higher-ups are aware that OBL is actually dead, but it is classified info until after the election because popular support for both wars would dwindle quickly if this was discovered. Yes, they said this. The Kerry angle comes in when they say that he knew OBL was dead yet still criticized Bush for not catching him, but Bush couldn't respond because the info is classified. I literally BURST out laughing. Something like that would hang BUSH, not Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC