Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't there film of the looting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:48 PM
Original message
Isn't there film of the looting?
How hard is it for some of the networks to pull up some film of the looting of these facilities. Don't all of you remember seeing it?

Oh yeah,

BOSTON RED SOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ciaobox Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't Know but here are some of the stories that ran...
Found some interesting links from past stories about looting/Al Qa Qaa

Were the weapons there on April 5, 2003?
Here is a report from 4/5/03 that details A weapons search at Al Qa Qaa. It seems that they DID know the weapons were there and verified it at that time:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A31589-2003Apr4¬Found=true


"In the first of yesterday's discoveries, the 3rd Infantry Division entered the vast Qa Qaa chemical and explosives production plant and came across thousands of vials of white powder, packed three to a box. The engineers also found stocks of atropine and pralidoxime, also known as 2-PAM chloride, which can be used to treat exposure to nerve agents but is also used to treat poisoning by organic phosphorus pesticides. Alongside those materials were documents written in Arabic that, as interpreted at the scene, appeared to include discussions of chemical warfare.

This morning, however, investigators said initial tests indicated the white powder was not a component of a chemical weapon. "On first analysis it does not appear to be a chemical that could be used in a chemical weapons attack," Col. John Peabody, commander of the division's engineering brigade, told a Reuters reporter with his unit.

U.N. inspectors have surveyed Qa Qaa some two dozen times, most recently last month. But some 1,000 structures there, organized into 10 or more factory complexes, have mainly been devoted to such conventional military industries as EXPLOSIVES and missile fuels. Neither is forbidden under U.N. Security Council mandates. Qa Qaa was last linked to proscribed activity in 1995 -- and somewhat peripherally then.

"Based on you couldn't form any real judgment," said Terence Taylor of Britain, a former inspector with the U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM). "It is a place where there would be a lot of chemicals, not necessarily related to chemical or biological weapons. More likely in that place it would relate to some form of rocket propellant."


Here are some more articles from the past.
UN nuclear team checks Iraq looting Friday, 6 June, 2003
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2967956.stm


Iraqi Nuclear sites 'stripped carefully'
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/14/iraq.nuclear.reut/

U.N. wants to inspect Iraq nuclear facility
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/special/iraq/1896768

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/08/sprj.irq.int.looting.reut/
http://www1.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=893F4B24-CA59-487E-A0E72485A33D8230
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC