Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's 20 January 2009. Who do you want to see taking the Oath?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:35 PM
Original message
It's 20 January 2009. Who do you want to see taking the Oath?
I'll remain fashionably neutral on this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The man we all hoped would be taking it tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyn2 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
61. Wes Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #61
92. me too! President Wesley K. Clark!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
93. Dennis Kucinich, the best of the best.
If we have a choice, no need to settle for less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Skinner
He's a stern, yet forgiving lee-der
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DODI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry/Boxer -- 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lenape85 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, Feingold/Boxer
Both have impeccable voting records, both have stood against NAFTA and the IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookieblue Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
56. agreed- Kerry/Boxer 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. Yep, that'd do it
I'd also take Kerry/Feingold.

If Mr. K wanted to give JE another go, that would be fine too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. The judge who should be sentencing
the whole WH gang to a long stay in club fed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinsb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think that after 4 years of *
the Democrats will be able to elect pretty much whoever they want. Now is the time for Progressives to move, to make sure that person is not a right-wing Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's what I'm thinking
I agree 100%. Sure they can steal a close election, but the blowout that will be 2008 will be very difficult for the republicans to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Repubs Will Still Own the Media and the Voting Machinez
If it weren't for that, we would be preparing to celebrate
the inauguration of President Kerry.

What makes you think it will be any different in 4 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinsb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. In 4 years
9/11 will seem further away and not as scary, more disabled veterans will be home and living on the streets, people will grow weary of war and defeceits and being the bad guy in the world, then there are the threats to social security etc.

By owning the media and the voting machines they can gloss over a close election but they can't hide a landslide without tipping everyone off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
52. None of Those Things Will Be Allowed To Matter
In 4 years, 9/11 will seem further away and not as scary,

Then they'll have another one.

more disabled veterans will be home and living on the streets

They'll hire more cops to keep them out of sight.

people will grow weary of war and defeceits and being the bad guy in the world,

We already were and are. But the media does not speak of such things.

then there are the threats to social security etc.

I wouldn't have thought the kind of attack they are mounting on SS
would be possible, but when you have that much control of the media,
I guess you can do anything you want.

By owning the media and the voting machines they can gloss over a close election but they can't hide a landslide without tipping everyone off.

Perhaps they already did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Agreed
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 05:15 PM by ThorsHammer
Hopefully we'll have good candidates on both sides this time around.

Edit - though I am wary of the GOP trying to stay far right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Howard Dean.
That would make a difference. Anybody else? I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think he could do it
If the PNAC Dems will get the fuck out of the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. I'm with you...
Dean could do it. But it will never in a million years happen, not with the old-line party as it is now.

I think Dean will make a bigger difference through DFA, after he loses the DNC chair race, than anything he could do. If he can energize DFA through '06 to another '08 prez run, he could act as the "conscience of the party," and thereby ensure an eventual nominee who reflects the deepest held convictions of the party. He might end up as veep on the ticket.

But the party's elite so far as been extremely resistant to reform...they like the way things are running now (for a variety of reasons that really ought to be explored someday).

Dean's greatest legacy could be through DFA, working to put candidates in the lower-level offices that will form the "farm team" for future national DNC candidates.

I haven't totally given up on a Dean DNC chairmanship, but it looks very unlikely now, the way the state chairs are being manipulated and the unnamed dark horses are being prepped.

Those reasons the old-line pols in the DLC and DNC don't want reform, just want to surface pander? They really ought to be explored. #1: It makes more money this way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wes Clark
or Mark Warner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. If We Get A Second Chance With Clark, We Better Not Screw It Up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clark. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Borgnine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. It depends.
I'd want to see Dean/Clark, Gore/Dean, or Gore/Clark, but the first two depend on whether or not Dean gets screwed out of the DNC chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Clark. We're going to need an economist with a military background.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 05:06 PM by roguevalley
Someone with the sense to know the rapture isn't coming and we're stuck here. And besides, someone who isn't butt ugly like *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Clark, Clark, Clark, Clark.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Dean
but it won't be him if he is the DNC Chair, and right now I think it is more vital that he have him as Chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
63. Dean. But agreed we need him as DNC Chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. General Wesley K. Clark (Ret)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Kronos Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
89. The General
Wesley Clark: Soldier, statesman, diplomat, economist, teacher, businessman, intellectual, patriot, Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush is allowing elections in 2008?????
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Mock elections. part of Pane&circenses program - to keep the sheep
busy while robbed and f8ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I said that weeks ago!
I now believe and hope that the "now regime" with leaders will keep loading their ship with hate and fear and can't stay afloat. The hole they will create in the republican party won't necessarily create more power to democrats. The whole structure that has been created, must be removed, not rehashed or formed to another political trashing of freedoms. It was not good for humanity to replace Hitler with Stalin in Europe! The best person will show up but they better hurry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Bush to run again
Bush will say that he can run again since he wasn't elected by the people in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. In a 'perfect world', Feingold.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 05:23 PM by ih8thegop
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=108x119120 (sorry the link is broken)

Durbin would also be fine.

But I'm okay with Biden, Boxer, Clark, Dean, Edwards, Gore, Kerry, Kucinich, Reid, and quite a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. On your list, I'm okay with
Boxer, Clark, Gore or Kerry (maybe even Biden). Maybe Edwards, but I still think he doesn't have enough experience. VP again would be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kerry or Clark
with Boxer as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wes Clark
but I doubt he'll run again.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Chas. Schumer of NY or Elliot Spitzer ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
78. Schumer?
You are joking right? Hey I liked him when he was my congressman I thought he was a pretty good guy. What happened to him after 911? He's like so many other Dem Senators - doesn't stand up to these thugs when he should. I don't totally despise the guy or anything but I sure don't think he's a possible President.


"They wrote in the old days that it is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country. There is nothing sweet nor fitting in your dying. You will die like a dog for no good reason."
--Ernest Hemingway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. William Jefferson Clinton
The way I see it, with Republican hubris, they would naturally repeal the amendment that only allows for only two terms. So when they are anticipating another Bush victory, Clinton will beat his face in and mop the floor with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. George W. Bush
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 05:32 PM by Touchdown
You folks are truly optimistic. After the next terrorist attacks, there won't be a 2008 election. Bank on it.

EDIT: OOPS! I didn't see the "want" in the question. That would be Dean, Feingold, or my dream Maxine Waters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. While I agree with the premise , I don't understand your wish.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 05:34 PM by robbedvoter

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. A Democrat, a real one
Someone who doesn't take any guff from the Republicans and who stands up for the little person.

Other than that, it's too early to name specific candidates. I'd rather concentrate on who I want replacing various Republicanite Senators and Congresscritters in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. Spitzer........and some yet unknown military hardass
Who hates Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. National Security won't be the issue in 2008
Hopefully, we will be out of Iraq by then. 9/11 will not be at the front of everyone's memory. The issue in 2008 will be Energy. The Cheap Oil Era will be over. Gas prices will have skyrocketed, making millions of Americans unable to afford gas, thus thrusting them into poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
62. Yeah...Right!
The Rethuglicans are going to let go of their calling Terror Card....I highly doubt it. They will continue to exploit fearmongering for all that it's worth.

You will have to pry that card out of their cold dead hands. Won't happen.

Unfortunately.....there will not be "Peace on Earth" by 2008. And actually, if there was...then it would mean that the Rethugs were successful in doing this.....and it would mean that they would get elected no matter who we would run.

I believe that in 2008, things will be just as horrid, if not more so Internationally....and the War on Terra will be used for maximum effect whenever required. Also Iran may be what will be on the "New product line" by 2006. Also don't underestimate that Bush will be in charge of our government during the 2008 election....so no, National Security will be THE issue....again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #62
72. Never said that National Security WON'T be an issue
Just that National Security won't be THE issue. People will not care about what is going on overseas when there are so many problems at home. The end of the Cheap Oil Era will make car usuage a habit of the wealthy. Many people won't be able to afford to drive to work, surburbia will become an isolated wasteland where property values will drastically fall, and the middle class will fall into poverty. Our nations agriculture system will stop working since most everyone gets vegetables shipped from California. When that cost of shipping jumps, the price of food will jump and people won't be able to afford food.

I say move closer to the center of town, start growing a garden, buy a fuel effiecent car for when you HAVE to take a trip, start riding a bike, and start paying off all of the dept that you have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. I like your idea....
in terms of your recommendations....hope things turn out that way.

But in the meantime, you have not addressed the point that I made in reference to the fact that Rethuglicans are not going to just "let go" of this winning issue for them. Heck, the are still doing the terrorist alerts....when convenient...and are talking about attacking Iran.

Again, I hope you are right....I just think the Rethugs have a much bigger mike than we have....and they aren't going to let go of their winning hand. That was the real point of my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. How about a known military hardass...
How about Clark. He won't take any sh*t from anyone! Remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. Barbara Boxer for PRESIDENT, not VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sophie996 Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
53. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. Wesley Clark. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Jeb.
I just hope they dispense with the formality of having the voting machines print.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blockhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. Byron Dorgan
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. A liberal democrat who's not afraid to call himself a liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Oh yes, you mean Wesley Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. Gore - and we can right this fucking nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. DK
-----------------------------------------------------------
Save this nation one town, county, and state at a time!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/electionreform.htm#why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. Al Gore.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. I second the Al Gore vote...
and at the moment think Boxer or Dean for the second (VP).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #57
86. I third it!
It ticked me off that the convention this past July wasn't Al Gore's. It should have been his convention, his re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pork Chop Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. I bet Bush will be taking the oath again for the third time
I'd like to see Obama maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_in_VA Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
48. I still think Kerry would make a darn good president.
Wesley Clark has grown on me, too..just recently. When he was running I found him somewhat unnerving. Something about his eyes...he rarely blinked. And I questioned his Dem credentials. Since then he seems to have gotten his politcal sea legs (he did a great job on the cable/broadcast news shows on behalf of Kerry). I can see myself supporting him in the next go around.

And I could probably be persauded to fall in love w/ Edwards again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
49. I'll say the General
Wes Clark....since the Rethugs will hold on to the "Fear card" as long as they can...which looking at the landscape will be forever.... unless we run a liberal national security expert that knows how to kick Rethuglican Ass!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
50. Wesley Kanne Clark
Please, let's not screw it up this time.

And, please, when the media tries to ignore him in favor of Hillary/or whomever other Dem that's running that doesn't stand a chance in hell of flipping not one red state, let's call 'em on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
51. Clark/Boxer
I will always believe that Clark was the one they feared most. I sincerely hope he runs in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
54. Clark/Pelosi...or Clark/Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Clark/Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
59. Boxer/Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
60. Howard Dean
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Wes Clark
Edited on Thu Jan-20-05 03:17 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
66. The "One"
Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ernstbass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
67. John Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. same here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #67
90. Clark
In fact I'm making plans now to take my daughters DC for the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
68. Bill Clinton.
Change the two-term rule!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexus Liberal Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Clark
Should have been Clark today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ynksnewyork2 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
71. For me,
not Kerry, not Hilary, not Biden, not Pelosi. I'll take Clark, Dean, Spitzer or Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
73. The 43rd President of the United States
Ending the interregnum of the Dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
74. Wes Clark. I don't care about VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
75. Gore/Dean, Gore/Boxer, Dean/Boxer

Dean/Harkin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
76. AL SHARPTON
I believe that no dem has a chance in 2008; Jeb Bush is going to take it next time. I guarantee that. After the Dems rolled over in 2000 and 200r, I will not get sucked in again by this waste of a party.. unless things change and the Dems actually evolve into an opposition party .. we will never get into the office again. (Still not over it x2)!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
77. Wes Clark!
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
80. I'm pleased to join the Clark choir
...but I will proudly support and work for any good, proud Democrat who earns the nomination. I only hope with all my heart that Wesley Clark is that good, proud Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
81. Anyone?
Edited on Thu Jan-20-05 08:23 PM by OnionPatch
Out of all the people running, I liked Carol Mosely Braun the best even though I thought she had no chance of winning. So I'm saying, since this is fantasy, Carol Mosely Braun. Then either Clark or Dean for vice president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
82. Wes Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
83. Me....
Unfortunately, I won't be 35 until a month after election day.

So, I will go with my Dad.

He will retired by then and will need something to keep him busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justy329 Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
84. I will basically take any Democrat.
Some favorite tickets:
1. Gore/Warner
2. Gore/Feingold
3. Clark/Warner
4. Kerry/Warner
5. Hillary/Warner
6. Obama/Gephardt
7. Gephardt/Obama


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOperative Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
85. ANYONE EXCEPT MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING FAMILIES:
Bush
Cheney
Kennedy
Clinton
Nixon
Reagan
Ford ( Harold excepted)
Schwartzenegger

I just HATE political dynasties. Sometimes they do more harm than good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
87. Kerry
Fantasy:

Senator Kerry works with REAL dems like Boxer, and Dean, and some names we don't know yet(whistleblowers, REAL journalist-heros)-and brings out the truth about the true evil behind the Bush cabal.

I want the truth about 9/11.

9/11 is the only reason Bush was back in office (besides fraud..he obviously got far too many legit votes to account for all fraud) and 9/11-the lie, the travesty is what is ruining and running our lives and much of the world's lives right now.

The lie the lie the lie.

I want Kerry to bring Bush down, I want the Republicans to know that they have supported the very people that let America be attacked, that used that as a ruse, using grief and fear and propaganda to invade Iraq, to ruin many lives there, and all the lives of the soldiers lost,and the many wounded in body and soul for life.

I want the dignity and promise of my country restored.

I want what we know was ours on November 2nd, before they changed reality again and took it all away in a fog of lies lies lies.

Chances are this is a fantasy..but you asked.. I don't just want a Democrat sworn in in 2009-I want the war over and the lies over.

A sane mind cannot live in lies. Our country is not of sound mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylla Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
88. CLARK!!!!
no one could do the job better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktop15 Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
91. Noam Chomsky
ssia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC