Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, should the Dems follow or go before Bush with a SS show of their own?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:14 AM
Original message
OK, should the Dems follow or go before Bush with a SS show of their own?
How else are the people in those places that Bush is traveling to going to learn the truth about SS? Someone needs to educate them and expose Bush's lies and half-truths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Follow ...
let him speak first, then rebut, lie by lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree--rebut with clarity !
Very important here for Dems to rebut with simple language--taking a play from the Repug's own playbook:
1) here's what Chimpy says
2) here's what would really happen (illustrating "Bush’s Social Security plan akin to a loan
Participants would forfeit part of accounts' profits
By Jonathan Weisman", http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6903404)
3) here's what we propose instead (simple language, illustration parallel but different from the one used in #2, above)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsSlacker Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. SS
Too bad we don't have a few brainiacs thinking up a good solution. I'm glad we at least, have half the population seeing there's something wrong with the Shrub's stand on this. Savings account? I'm a single mom in my late 40s, self employed. At this time in my life I can't even think about trying to save for my retirement.. let along look back on all those years raising my kids on a tight budget.
Oh, yeah,.. but at least those people who can afford to stash some now or the higher incomes don't have to worry about that issue.
Thankfully, I'm not stupid enough to think that any SS after 65 would support me. I'm planning on working until my last breathe..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. a lot of us thought that way
but boy that check every month sure makes life better for a lot of people whether you can work or you can't. for many its a life saver..no one knows what life for any of us will be like in 25 years...but one thing is sure that ss check is a lifesaver....so don't discount its value
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think so
It would be fairly simple as far as I can tell. Just a couple of simple tweaks...raising the cap, scaling back part of the tax breaks for the top 15... Unfortunately, that would only help the average American, so the big corporations would just tear it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just tell the people what rethugs said when SS was recapitalized in RR
early days, how it would provide promised future benefits for a long, long time, then point out every lie, distortion, untruth being spouted today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PEmboli Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think they have to
come up with a plan. it's just not enough anymore to say no and then not offer an alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. a counterplan for what problem?
What should the "plan" do?

And isn't it very cogent to point out that the factual underpinnings of the rationale for change does not support Bush's words and warnings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Have them just propose remoiving the cap for the wealthy
Let them propose the wealthy picking up their fair share of the program. That solves the problem. No cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. Have them follow Bush and just tell the truth with simple facts and figure
Remind people that Bush predicted SS would be bankrupt by 1988. Remind people that Clinton/Gore left SS in better shape than ever before and that the "lock box" was riduculed and joked about by the Republicans because they are not interested in saving SS. They are interested in dismantling the program. They never wanted it in the first place. Nor do they want any other social programs to help needy citizens. They hate Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Food stamps, Head Start, and a host of other social safety nets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInRed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. We must DEFINE the issue first, and NOT let them define it.
Rebutting is fine, but it is not enough and it's what we always do - respond, instead of run offense and SELL.

We cannot allow them to put an image in people's heads that the system is bankrupt. Once that takes hold, rebutting will not be effective. We must take the initiative and put Bush on the defensive now. We must set the frame that SS is solvent and will be until the youngest Baby Boomers turn 78. And then SS will still be able to pay 80%.

We must also sell the image of them STEALING money from the elderly and the Baby Boomers. This image must get in the minds of people BEFORE Bush's frame is allowed to take hold.

This is a PR campaign. We've been right on the facts FOREVER, but has that alone gotten results? No. We have to be aggressive and if the Dems don't act soon, we need more PAC ads to set the frame our way. Paging George Soros, please run ads now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC