Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does the GOP want to protect clinic bombers from bankruptcy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 11:16 AM
Original message
Why does the GOP want to protect clinic bombers from bankruptcy?
snip>
Leading Republicans say that because of their increased Senate majority, they now can overcome an amendment by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that prohibits those convicted of abortion-clinic violence from filing for bankruptcy protection to avoid paying court fees. Republican leaders plan to call up the legislation on the first week back from the Presidents Day recess.

If Republicans succeed in passing bankruptcy legislation, it would be their second major victory on pro-business legislation this year, on the heels of legislation the Senate approved last week to curb class-action lawsuits.

Schumer was first able to attach his amendment to bankruptcy legislation at a Judiciary Committee meeting in 2000, and the issue has been the major sticking point in enacting a bankruptcy bill since then.
...
...“Everyone knows there won’t be a bill if is in there,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who called the amendment the biggest challenge.

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021605/schumer.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. clinic bombers = domestic terrorists!!
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 11:19 AM by eShirl
why are the GOP pandering to domestic terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, this is
a good idea. Only it should be applied to all convicted felons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. What in the hell?
That's a helluvan opportunity. Why on Earth wouldn't we take that and ram it back down their throats?

They're protecting terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippythwndrdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This can definitely be used to our advantage.
Good call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC