Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bush rushing us to war with Syria and Iran.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:01 PM
Original message
Is Bush rushing us to war with Syria and Iran.
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 07:02 PM by dogindia
any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm guessing it's a foregone conclusion
How or when, I'm not sure but the little warmonger isn't done yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I see big problems for him if he tries to get out of his current problems
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 07:33 PM by The Backlash Cometh
by wagging the dog to war. Not even the media believes him any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We'll have another "terrorist attack" soon
Not sure where, but it'll happen. It worked last time.

Then again, I'm a doomsayer. You should probably take my opinion with a grain of salt. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. My crystal ball says, "Impeachment".
Thus I will make a bet the Bush Jr. Administration is stupid enough to do just that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
borg5575 Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's Carl Rove's strategy.
It's how they plan on defeating Hillary in 2008. They will attack Iran and Syria just before the 2008 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. 2006 elections; drumbeat for Iraq hit during midterm elections
just my prediction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LdyGuique Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, he seems to be backing off a bit today
When Iran and Syria announced that they would act as a "united front" yesterday, this seemed to cause Lame Duck to back off a bit today.

The administration can posture all it likes, but it has few resources to really take on two more Islam-based countries without causing an entire explosion in the ME -- including a complete cessation of oil production.

We don't have sufficient manpower to effectively handle the rising counter-insurgency in Iraq. At this point, various news stories are citing the new supplemental funding request for Iraq/Afghanistan as saying that less than 5% of the necessary Iraqi forces have been trained. Rumsfeld even admitted today that these are "battle-hardened" people who will move into other countries.

Several major countries have been forming alliances to counter the US' foreign policies -- such as China, Russia, India, Venezuela, and Iran. Europe is taking notice. OUR stances are a direct cause and effect.

There is strong supposition that Israel is the only one who stood to gain from a clandestine bombing in Lebanon -- mostly to throw public blame and censor onto Syria. Syria stood little to gain over the bombing.

If the US bombs or invades either Iran or Syria, expect a worldwide uprising against it with a huge increase in terrorist-type attacks and a generalized mobilization of jihadists converging into the ME. Expect all OPEC nations to react strongly in order to serve their own interests as they are already on the firing line of jihadist groups. They will have to sever ties to the US or cut oil production to keep from falling into their own civil wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I give it a 30 year timeframe, somewhere inside that period
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 07:26 PM by Selatius
It may not be a Bush in the White House that sets the ball into motion. Bush isn't the only corporatist or power-hungry would-be dictator to lust for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. It would be the beginning of the end for the US
We're aqlready over extended. That would be the straw that broke our economic back as well as destroying any shred of credibility we have left in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC