|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MIMStigator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:25 PM Original message |
Tom Harkin said before you count Dean out remember Dukakis lost Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not the Best Comparison, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Clinton lost IA too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. For the 100th time, that is not a valid comparison; Clinton didn't compete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. All the more reason it is valid... Iowa makes little difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. Dukakis was the NE liberal establishment favorite, and SHOULD have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eissa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. What's wrong with NE liberals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Southerner here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Hopefully the NE liberal elite in power corridor don't share your opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Nor I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Have you read the Clinton Wars? Blumenthal, a NE liberal (actually Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. The south doesn't dictate...voters vote for the candidate they like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chocolateeater (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, I for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. and we remember where THAT led |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. out in the far western part of iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. He also lost the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Clinton lost Iowa and won the election, also. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Clinton didn't campaign in Iowa, so bad comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Right...Clinton in 92 is more comparable to Clark in 04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Precismo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Clinton had a good reason not to go to IA (Harkin). Clark didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Well maybe Harkin shoulda used him as an example instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Because Harkin knows he was also in that primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Tom Harkin is trying to avoid looking like he picked the wrong guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Harkin might be following party orders: support Dean on the surface, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. Reminding me of '88 reminds me of why I pull for Clark, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-04 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. Ha ha ha ha ha. Did he really say that? Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-04 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
28. BAD example, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC