|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
lindsayg (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:45 PM Original message |
Clinton/Obama '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. Provided the GOP runs Jeb Bush/Alan Keyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. No way. Anybody But Clinton/Obama '08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. She is well respected. Decisive is just the brush the rovbots have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. How about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. ugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. LOL. I thought at first that said Clark/Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus Saves (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. Clinton/Schweitzer or Clinton/Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Clark as VP is a no-starter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Thats not true on the Republican side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Nope. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveConn (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Feingold/Clark > Clinton/Obama. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Clark has no interest in the VP position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveConn (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:39 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. I doubt he is that conceited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. Sure, I really like losing.................n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
10. Pppfffffbbbbllllllllttt!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. A woman with baggage + a inexperienced black = a perfect way to loose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. OMG - We all agree - the conventional wisdom stinks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. I am still waiting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starwolf (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
22. A major loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solar (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
23. no way in hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmericanDream (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. We have better candidates.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
26. Clark/Feingold 08, a winning ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveConn (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. I'd love that ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
27. Clark/Feingold or Clark/Boxer. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. NOOOOOOOOOOO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 08:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Awww, Come on, Saracat! The Freeps really want her to run! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
30. NO MORE FAMILY POLITICAL DYNASTIES. NO NO NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
32. blech. I'll pass. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
33. I like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renaissanceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
34. Sell-outs for '08? No thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
35. It's too early for Obama--his time will come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Discord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
36. forget it. no way it will happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
37. Another Jell-O and Pablum offering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
38. Two Senators... One is bad enough, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chomskysright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
39. NO yet again: she will lose an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
40. neither one of them would stand up for Ohio vote probs. !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Bill Clinton On Ohio - "Stop being a whinner-get over it" ??! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
42. Not with my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC