Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My excellent adventure at my neocon congressman's office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:25 PM
Original message
My excellent adventure at my neocon congressman's office
Well I just drove over to the local office of Rep. Gallegly here in
Westlake Village. It's in a newer building, definitely AA or AAA-,
among the highest rents in the area. Nice digs. The office itself is
spacious, with a wall of windows and a view that takes in our local
mountains beyond the 101. I know and have clients in this building.
All of them are quite affluent.

No one is at the front desk, but a nicely turned out older blonde
woman, the kind you expect to see in these parts, at maybe a wine
tasting or the local Country Club, immediately approaches me
asking, "may I help you?", and her air gives me the impression she
isn't a receptionist. She's Paula Sheil, District Director. I
identify myself and tell her I've spoken to Pam Roller, her office
scheduler who is in D.C., about scheduling a meeting with us. "For
what?" she asks, eyeing my card (California For Democracy, Southern
Ca Council , Group leader, Democracy for America, et al) warily.

"I wanted to meet with a member of your staff so that we may express
our views to the congressman on Social Security" I tell her. "It's a
National Dialog Day for us and I wanted to inform the congressman
about the concerns of some of his constituency". "Oh", she
said. "Like what?" I proceed to tell her we want the congressman to be aware of our concern with the president's expenditures on his roadshow, how it's not really open to the public, how people are screened and removed from these events...."you mean for screaming and throwing things, causing a disturbance, like that?" asks Paula. "No. For attending." I go on " members of our group have been removed from these meetings, making the claim of open town hall very questionable". Paula furrows her brow, and asks" what was it you wished to say with your group?"

Back at square one, I tell her about the lack of crisis in Social
Security, how it's fine as is until 2032, that the whole issue could
be solved by just raising the payroll exclusion ceiling from $90,000
to 190,000, that the President's proposals do nothing to solve this,
and in fact add several trillion dollars of expense to the tab.
Apparently this is the first time she has heard any of this. She
responds " well, I guess there's some disagreement about that. The
president claims it will be broke before that, so I suppose it's
which numbers you believe." She adds that kids call her office every
day, requesting that they have a say in their retirement
planning. "Now, what do you want to talk about with your group?" I
look her into her steely blue eyes. "I wanted to talk about Social
Security. To express the concerns of some of your constituents". "Well, haven't we just done that?" She folds her
hands.

"Well, you and I have done that but there are others in my group who
wish to express themselves tomorrow" She looks up, returning my
gaze. " I don't know if you understand. We help out specific people
with individual problems here. When I saw you I thought maybe you had
a problem with medicare or something. We aren't a political
office." "I appreciate that", I say," but these folks want to know
someone is listening." " What group are you folks? You're not
MoveOn, are you? They are simply awful, they came up here and one of
them peed in my sink, then the girl, a scruffy hippie type, she put
her dirty feet on my desk, and it turned out she had illegal drugs
in her purse, and they ended up being arrested. When that guy took
out his penis and peed in my sink, I told him "that's it, you're
under arrest" and they ended up spending three days in jail"
Taken aback by this apocryphal tale , I can only say "Really? Peed
in your sink? What were they here for in the first place? Antiwar?
She slowly shakes her head. "They think I don't know who they are, they all call here and read from the same script, I ask them "are you with Moveon?" and they say no but I know they are. It's the same script. Are you with MoveOn?" "No" I say. "We are a political group, and I know MoveOn , but I've never heard about the incident you described. When was this? Peed in your sink?" I can't help myself. This is a very genteel community, and that is the raddest thing I've heardhappening around here in...well, like EVER...I assure her we justwant to talk , and she reiterates that "we're not a political
office" and wonders did I think this was like an outing or a dressup picnic or somesuch. I offer to bring her lunch.

Just then, a skinny, intense guy, the kind you'd see at the Honda dealership selling you undercoating you don't need, hawkish features that give him a semi-intense leaning into the wind look, steps up. Paula says , "oh hi Brad, this is Mike Hickerson," gesturing my way. I wait for him to extend his hand. He does not. So I remain seated. "Mike Hickerson" he says without pausing, "longtime Democratic political activist since the sixties. You're not here for any meeting. You just want to cause trouble" I Googled your name. I know who you are. You're bringing the press tomorrow! You work for Howard Dean!" He say Gov. Dean's name like you would expect one to say, oh, "Jeffrey Dahmer." "What??" says Paula querulously. "Howard Dean? He's a screaming lunatic! Oh, Mike, I thought you were so nice..." " Yes, Howard Dean", says Brad or Tom or whatever his name is. "He just wants to cause trouble. He wants to embarrass the President" "He's a screaming maniac" repeats Paula, like it's a monastery chant. "Look", I say, "I don't appreciate your characterization of this as a political event" "Well, what is it for then? You've invited the press." "I'm ambivalent about that" I tell him. "I don't know that they will find this newsworthy" "You mean", says Brad, " you don't know if they'll come." "Yeah. Besides, do you not want the press here?" "You just want to cause trouble, and embarrass the President." He repeats this several times. "You're not interested in Social Security. You're partisan." "What part of Social Security is partisan?" I ask, raising my voice to meet his level." That's all we want to discuss" "Youre not an interest group. Howard Dean is the head of the ...?" He waits for me to finish his sentence for him. "Democratic National Committee" I say. "SEE?" He says triumphantly.

"We're not a political office" says Paula. I don't want a bunch of
MoveOn crazies up here. Besides, you've expressed what you have to
say. Your group must understand this isn't a dressup and go out
field trip picnic thing. You should put your concerns in writing,
then we will pass them on to the congressman." "I'll be happy to put
them in writing" I tell her "and if the press is a concern, we'll
leave them downstairs, hows that?" "We aren't a political office
here." "I can see that. I'll put our concerns in writing and we'll plan on delivering that to you tomorrow. See you then, and thank you for taking the time today, Sheila" Skinny guy has left as abruptly as he entered. Just as well.

Thus, the dress rehearsal for the Social Security dialog ends.
Threatened with arrest, insulted, and the leader of our party called
a "screaming lunatic ".
Your tax dollars in action.
I'm glad they were expecting me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's quite the odyssey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee, I'm sure glad they "aren't a political office."
What the hell? They bash MoveOn, Howard Dean, the DNC and others and they AREN'T a political office?

That is just messed up.

We need to investigate whether our tax dollars are being spent on these events. I suspect all of this is highly illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. You need to take this to your local newspaper. Have it in the news
and see how fast these fascists close the door on you. The bastards. Retards in power. That is what is wrong with this country. Hugs to you, honey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. Did you tell this story to Rep. Waxman? Didn't he call for
an investigation of tax funds spent for "town hall meetings?" He might be interested in how you were treated in this "non-political" office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finecraft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. What does she mean "This isn't a political office"?
Just what kind of office does she think it is? What a load of crap! Everything her boss- the congressman -does is political. Well, at least you know what to expect tomorrow at the "non-political" office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Paula Sheil had the prescription drugs
and Brad peed in her sink.

The pretzel made them do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now, lessee...
... if you had come with fistfuls of cash in your pockets, they would suddenly have become a political office, I think. :)

Save this little encounter and make a flyer of it for the next election.

Ah, the rich... they are so transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Mamma Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm so glad that you posted that ...
Someone in our local group has been trying to schedule a SS meeting with our Rep for tomorrow. Ain't gonna happen I guess. We're getting an aide on 4/21 -- Woo-Hoo, I'm thrilled. So it was nice to a least live vicariously through your post a little - -Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks Mike
what an adventure Some day I'll catch up with Mary(bonehead) Bono.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Good luck with that, mitch!
This is a "scream"~! But so typical..they sound like a bunch of scared little wabbits!

The big bad Dean is coming to get them!:hide:

Very rivetingly written, Cap'n/Mike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can you go to Dreier's office next?
please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. you had me glued to the screen, get this to the paper asap. I don't
always read to the end of these posts, yours was great. i had to finish it. The people you talked to did a great job of demonstrating the real representation Schrub and the neocons want the repugs to give. they hurt themselves and people shouldn't be kept out of the loop about it. They want to read this, they just don't know it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Really outstanding job!!!
Kudos. What a bunch of dim bulbs. It will be interesting to see them try to defend those statements. Not a political office!
HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. I got this in my mail but didn't get to go..


Your Organizer, Vicki L. Trojnor, sent the following message to
the members of The Utica Democracy for America Meetup Group:

Dear Members and Activists,

As you all know our local Republican Representatives , Boehlert and Walsh have refused repeated request by various groups, including ours to have Townhall meetings on Social Security. While President Bush and other administration officials are flying around the country and touching down in cities in West Virginia, Michigan and elsewhere trying to sell their idea of PIRATIZING/PRIVATIZING Social Security our Republican members of Congress remain silent.
It's time to apply a bit of the grassroots pressure to them. That's why Fingerlakes DFA, Binghamton Citizens Action and the Working Familes Party is planning a Rally on the steps of Rep Boehlert's Cortland Office.

Please come out and lend a hand. Social Security is not just for retirement benefits. It's an insurance program that protects the disabled and the widowed.

Come and lend your voice , and bring a homemade sign. Some
suggestions are "Why won't you meet with us?" "Don't
Piratize/Privatize Social Security" "Townhall Meetings are
Democracy in Action"

When: Wednesday April 13th 12:30 p.m.
Where: Rep Boehlert's Cortland Office
75 Church ST
Cortland, NY 13045

map http://tinyurl.com/4jx53



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Capn, you have to format the dialogue in this and send it
somewhere! At first I thought this was fiction!

Peed in the sink? Did she really say that?! It makes one wonder what stories they'll come up with about you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Man convicted of peeing in U.S. Rep’s office - This checks out
http://www.smdp.com/archives/072303.pdf
page #9

Man convicted of peeing in U.S. Rep’s office
By The Associated Press
VENTURA — An anti-war protester was convicted of urinating in the office of U.S. Rep. Elton Gallegly. Christopher Vestuto, 47, was found guilty of interfering with business and urinating in public place during an April 1 protest at the Republican's Thousand Oaks
office, the district attorney's office said Monday. Vestuto was sentenced to 10 days in the Ventura County Jail Work Release
Program and he was placed on three years' probation. He was also ordered to stay at least 100 yards from Gallegly and the congressman's staff. Three people were arrested after more than 15 anti-war protesters invaded Gallegly’s district office and began screaming and rifling through desks. Sheriff’s deputies said the group barged into the congressman’s inner office and attempted to stop him from working. One of the protesters urinated in the sink of the office kitchen, said the congressman,
who then telephoned deputies and the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Maybe if you promise not to pee in thier sink they will see you
For the love of Pete - I can't believe people would act this stupid. Ignorant stunts like this hurt our cause. I support protest but when idiots do stuff like this, it's no wonder you ran into static.

It's completely wrong for them to deny you access to your congressman, however. They are not obligated to meet with you but they should not openly discriminate against you because you support Howard Dean. Dean is a respected Democratic Party member not some raving lunatic that should be mocked by the staff of a U.S. Congressman. To use the excuse that a lunatic who was in no way affiliated with your group broke the law in thier office before should not have any bearing on the way they talk to you. I believe an open apology to Gov. Dean is in order and to you as well. A Congressman is a public servant who should be receptive to the concerns of his constituency and not place all those who have a dissenting opinion in the same boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree that it's not constructive
This isn't about what MoveOn did or didn't do. We simply want to be heard. Seeing as how this incident is so recent, it puts the hostility into perspective. I had no idea this had happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes but it does not excuse thier remarks about the leader of the DNC
Edited on Wed Apr-13-05 11:53 PM by mikelewis
Nor does it excuse thier abrasive demeanor when addressing you and our group. Moveon and Democracy for America are two completely different groups. Moveon may attract people who act in this manner but I am sure they frown on this behavior as well. But to call Dean a howling lunatic is uncalled for. These types of attacks are unwarranted under any circumstances. The woman could have simply took your information and informed you politely that the Congressman was not able to see you. She should have left it at that, discussion over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. A little background on that
I contacted the DC office where the "scheduler " is some two weeks ago, around the same time they were mobbed. The timing must have made them think there was a connection ; I then sent two more faxes and never received a reply, so I dropped in to see if they knew we were coming. I sent them a heads up to that effect on this past Saturday as well. After meeting with them today, I got to my office and there was a faxed reply from the DC lady.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Not recent - July 2003
When you return, remain civil. Point out that you have learned about the incident, and assure her that you would never condone such an act, and ask her not to judge, just as you would not judge her (because she works for a republican) for the statements of those at a conservative convention last week including the view that federal judges shouldn't just be impeached, but should be impaled. Point being - there are folks who are very extreme - and the rest of us should not be judged by their actions (now you have an "us" and "them" thing going with her and you as the us). Remind her that the great thing about democracy is the ability for folks to dialogue, civilly. And that some of our best moments in history, things like the forming of the constitution, came from dialogue between folks who did not always agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. i agree
That Brad guy said you were only there to cause trouble, and if you prove him right then they will be even less likely to listen next time. Try and open up a civil discussion where you can both get your points across.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. I totally agree with you guys
I misread the date; I thought it happened THIS year, not two years ago. And I've been doing this long enough to know when theater is important and when it's a distraction from the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. So, how did it go today?
Would be interested in reading an update - weren't you going back today with others interested in talking to the congressman's office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. After yesterday , today was anticlimactic
There was pointedly, no one in the office save one longterm associate of Galleglys. None of the people I talked to.

The press no-showed as well. However there were a couple of plainclothes and a sherriff's car kind of hanging around, something they never do in this area.

I wrote a nice work up on SS (I'll post it seperately) and gave that to her. She was very nice.

I was tempted to ask her to show me the sink.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. Great job!
Though it may not have appeared so to you, you probably had a VERY big impact. Whether they agree with them or not, elected officials always pay attention to what constituents have to say.

We all have more power than we realize in our congressional districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Any friendly newspaper columnists in your area?
that would certainly make a stimulating read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. Great story...recommending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. Can you write a shorter version of this to your local news editor?
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 01:24 AM by Dr Fate
It's very entertaining- It might see print.

Recommending- very fun & informative read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. That's a great idea.
I was thinking a LTTE, but you certainly have a better suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. Your Story Rings True - I Met With Similar Disinterest Two Years Ago
When visiting the offices of my two Senators and Representative.

My issue was the jobless recovery and long-term unemployment.

Too say that they did not care is an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. Great story, and very, very sad....
...they had no interest in hearing an opinion that did not jive with what they were told to think. Thats what really comes across, they just don't think independently. Their party told them what to think about Social Security. Thats good enough for them. Their party told them what to think about other organizations and people. Thats good enough for them. Life must be easy when one doesn't have to think for themselves....

Wow, what a bunch of Moonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. what's wrong with Paula Scheil's reaction
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 04:49 AM by NJCher
This woman is stereotyping. She's taken the bad behavior of a couple people and painted everyone left of Gallegly with the same broad brush.

So a guy used her sink as a urinal. Welcome to the world of bad public behavior, Ms. Scheil. You and quite a few million others in government and other jobs where one must deal with the public should know that crackpots are encountered on a regular basis. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Yes, we see you've tried mightily to insulate yourselves (at the taxpayer's expense) with cushy quarters but the fact of the matter is that you ARE in a government job and YOU ARE accountable to the public.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
26. dailykos might like this!
half a million hits a day...that'll get the word out...

I was informed in my high school government class some years ago that congressmen/women worked for us, and as their employers, we could see and speak with them anytime we wanted (after setting an appointment of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. her main priority seems to be not to embarrass Bush--well bush does
that well enough all by himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. Sounds like a Dave Berry Column
Whats sad is that I believe that this is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. Hmm....just like when citizens early on questioned Hitlers tatics...
"We're not a political office" Bawhahahah.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
31. They say "partisan" like
it's a BAD THANG.

lol

I want to set this to music, Capn Sunshine. "The Ballad of Our Concerns in Writing" :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
32. I do not understand NeoCons. If you get 51% of the vote in a district,
you know that 49% of the vote is against you. If you implement a policy of exclusion, 51% is the highest vote you will receive. If your public policy cause you to lose even 2% of your base, you've lost the election.

I don't care what happened in that office, this is not a good policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
34. LMAO.
Oh Captain, my Captain! I'm glad they were expecting you too.

Next time lol, bring a few of us Code Pinkers along ;) I shudder to think of the adjectives they might come up with in that case!

"What part of Social Security is partisan?" Excellent answer! You did us proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. Could yo see the battery packs in their necks? They sound like automatons
Stepford Idealogues with recorded voices...just sickening. This is representative government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. kick

personally I'd like to mess up her hair and smear her lipstick.

put a stinkbomb in their 'non political' office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. I got redistricted into Gallegly's
feifdom a couple of years ago. He routinely gets re-elected with 65% of the vote. He doesn't give a damn what any Democrat thinks, and he votes the straight chimp agenda. He's a worthless piece of shit, and while it's unfortunate that someone peed in his sink two years ago, one of his smarmy staffers no doubt got the guy mad enough to do it. I'd have to hear both sides of that story before I came to any conclusions.

You were brave for walking into that snake pit. You could talk until you were blue in the face and it wouldn't make any difference, though. Gallegly only represents the repuke right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. What are the chances of defeating this extremist asshole next year?
I will contribute to his opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Dear Capn, are you pulling our legs? This is too weird to be real.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. Gallegly is my Congressman too....
unfortunately, Ojai, pretty much a blue village, is gerrymandered into a sea of rednecks, neocons, and whacko fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. When you think about it, Ventura County
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 07:53 PM by LibDemAlways
has little reason to keep Gallegly on the public payroll. What does he do for the district? Not a hell of a lot.

Promote business? Hardly. The biggest employer in the county is probably the government. Not many private sector well paying jobs here. Businesses off the 101 run the gamut from strip malls....to auto malls. Most people in my East County neighborhood work in the SF Valley and on the Westside - in LA County where the jobs are.

Fight to keep social security for the many seniors in the district like the hundreds in leisure village in Camarillo? Well, no. He'd vote to cut their benefits in a heartbeat.

Provide outreach services to Hispanic and other immigrants who increasingly call the county home? Not on your life.

Fight for increased education funding to improve schools throughout the county? In your dreams.

Gallegly's sole purpose in life is to collect big checks from a relatively few wealthy people in the district who call Lake Sherwood or North Ranch home, and reward those donors with equally big tax breaks. He also pays lip service to the military down at Port Hueneme - though he'd think nothing of screwing vets.

Capn Sunshine's experience is all too typical of rightwing repukes in general whose inevitable response to any opposing point of view is the chimp's very own catchphrase "Who cares what you think?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I'm pretty sure Ventura County's biggest employer is Amgen
Probably far and away. After that, Baxter labs. After that, Dole Foods Corp HQ is there. Also NetZero and Realtor.com.

So they have a little smoke when it comes to corporate influence.
But I don't believe Gallegly helped in any of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
48.  You're right. Amgen is the county's largest private
employer - over 6000 Thousand Oaks employees. (They do their manufacturing in Puerto Rico, though.) The largest employer overall is the government - 42,900 federal, state, and county jobs according to the March State of CA Employment Development Report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
49. Did you mistakenly wander into the Office of Special Assholes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. BTW Rumor has it Gallegly is being talked about as DeLays replacement
god help us every one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. Damn, I'm confused.
It's a Congressman's local office, but it's not a political office? Then what exactly do they do there? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
52. You're a constituent, they work for you
whether they agree with you politically or not. Your concern about SS is a constituency issue and its their job to deal with it.

You have every right to meet with them and express your views and they are obligated to listen and provide you with an answer as to why they aren't doing what you ask.

Your Congressman and his staff are employed to represent everyone in district, not just the ones who voted for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
54. Talk about divorced from reality....
Edited on Fri Apr-15-05 05:47 PM by libertypirate
They define the term ditto heads...

You should have recorded it...

Let the rethugs hear how they treat people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. You ought to send this to your local paper or print it up in flyers and
hand out at the supermarkets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
56. wow. totally brainwashed party loyalists
...my daughter luckily did not get a job that was adjacent to and somehow connected with, GOP headquarters in Redondo Beach just before the election. i think she would have gone into a screaming rant had she gotten it.

these folks cannot see what lunatics they are.

i have to hand it to you for venturing into the valley of darkness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC