Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time for a new term: THEOPUBLICAN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:55 PM
Original message
Time for a new term: THEOPUBLICAN
I'm been saying 'thugs, Repugs, Repukes for 5 years now, and thus far it has been pretty much me, every now and then someone else I talk to will pick up on it, but most of the time I've heard back just "them" or "Republican"

about 3 weeks I started to use THEOPUBLICAN.. (I don't claim originality) and guess what.. from the people I talk to, IT'S STICKING. It's hitting a mental chord and IT'S STICKING. Sometimes people as 'what's that?' and after a very brief explanation, I get a nod of the head and IT STICKS.

The other terms are more blatently insulting true, and that's why I think it dosen't stick. This does.

Theopublicans...

Let's see if we can get this mainstream (hell, I'll settle for Air America... can we get a caller to Randi?? Malloy?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Theocons" sounds better methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope.... and this is why..
Edited on Tue May-10-05 01:00 PM by Rosco T.
when you stick 'con' it sounds more like slang and dosen't resonate with any of the 'common terms' and it comes off more like an 'attack'.. (yes it is, but that's beside the point).

People understand REPUBLICAN

It 'attaches' itself to the "-publican" in the head, something familar..

People understand THEOPUBLICAN

I used TheoCon also and it didn't have the 'sticking power'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttotheend Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. OK can I have a brief, clue me in on how you came up with this..
I'll pass it on :-), b/c fuckerheads isnt nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Quite Simple...
Edited on Tue May-10-05 01:09 PM by Rosco T.
1. THEOCRARY
2. REPUBLICAN

THEOPUBLICAN

the Religious Reich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttotheend Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. OHHHHHHHHHHH,
Edited on Tue May-10-05 01:14 PM by fighttotheend
;) Got it, Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttotheend Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. lookie here..
Theocracy

Theocracy, derived from two Greek words meaning "rule by the deity," is the name given to political regimes that claim to represent the Divine on earth both directly and immediately. The idea of direct and immediate representation is important for two reasons.

First, most governments throughout history and across cultures have claimed to be following their gods' designs or to be legitimated by a divine mandate. An example is the notion that kings rule by divine right. (This theory, which had been important in European politics in the sixteenth century, lost ground after the "Glorious Revolution" in England in 1688.) But governments in which the ruling and the priestly roles are separate are not considered to be theocracies. Second, the divine mandate must be interpreted by human beings in specific political contexts, such as wars or floods or famines. In theocracies the interpreters--who explain what these events mean--are the rulers. A number of ancient civilizations worshipped their kings as gods on earth, so the problem of interpretation was somewhat different. By definition, the king could not be wrong.

In theory, there is no reason why a theocracy and a democratic form of government are incompatible--vox populi, vox dei ("the voice of the people is the voice of God")--but historically those nations regarded as theocracies have been ruled by a theologically trained elite. This may be a council of clerics, or a charismatic leader may claim a special call from God and gain office by force of arms. The office might later become hereditary. The primary effort of government in a theocracy is to implement and enforce divine laws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't need a new word - They're "Theocrats"
And using Theocrats has the added benefit of including the word RAT - TheocRATs.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. and it sounds like DEMOCRAT... think.... n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Theo-fascists
or dominionist-fascists. They are not Republicans, regardless of the fact that they use the Republican party as a vehicle. By pointing this fact out to actual Republicans, they can wake up to the fact that they need to take their own party back from these lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. It doesn't "sing"
You need something that comes off the tongue better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. I like "theoCons"
Edited on Tue May-10-05 02:11 PM by ComerPerro
Although, I read the post above about why you don't like using it.

I just think "TheoPublican" sounds akward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. One thing you can do with "Theopublican" you can do .....
Edited on Tue May-10-05 04:06 PM by Rosco T.
.. that you can't do with any other term. You can just 'slip' it in the conversation, the ear may only hear the 'publican' the first few times and then it gets stuck in the head.

One person I had been saying this around just started to 'spontanously' say it, when I was grinning back at her, she asked why and when I told her she just stopped dead for a second and then said "yeah, it does seem to fit them better dosen't it, I hadn't even thought about it, it just was there....".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC