Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can the Supreme Court overturn the Senate rule change if Frist succeeds?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ztn Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 02:57 PM
Original message
Can the Supreme Court overturn the Senate rule change if Frist succeeds?
I was thinking of this before. Are issues like the "nuclear option" involving senate rule changes in governance like the filibuster subject to review by the courts?

Anybody know for sure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 02:58 PM
Original message
no
the Constitution gives the Senate the right to make its own rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ztn Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks. I figured it was how you said but I wasn't sure.
Oh well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, they can't.
It's a Senate rule, not a law. Constitutionally, the Senate sets its own rules and follows its own traditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But if they are claiming that the
filibuster is unconstitutional then wouldn't someone else need to decide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No. The Senate makes its own rules and no other branch of govt
can second-guess them. If a majority of Senators decides tomorrow that the Committee structure is unconstitutional or that 95 votes are required to pass legislation, unless the Constitution sets out how a matter must be voted on (such as treaties or constitutional amendments, for example), there's nothing the Supreme Court can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ztn Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Thanks. I figured it was how you said but I wasn't sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. NO, but they can filibuster every other action in the Senate!
As I understand it, this is what they mean by shuting down the Senate! You do realize this worked in the House with the rules change to the committee that was to check out Tom DeLay! It turned out that the committee couldn't meet without the Dems, and the Pubs finally had to change the rules back!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They wouldn't even have to filibuster
To shut down the business of the Senate. Under unanimous consent, most bills are never read on the floor. If just one Senator requests a specific bill to be read-or all bills, they have to do it.

Think of how long it would take clerks to read out loud, a 4,000 page appropriations bill. Or all the relevent laws that the Patriot Act changes. Or the Transportation bill. It could drag on for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Quorum calls as well
That slows things down.

Useless amendments, filibusters, etc. there are all sorts of fun parliamentary tricks to grind the Senate to a halt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually, that sounds like a pretty
good thing to do, anyway. think of how much crap is slipped into bills that no one, no one, knows about except the slipee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC