Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Government Condemn Land in NO and Buyout Displaced w/Pittance?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:02 AM
Original message
Will Government Condemn Land in NO and Buyout Displaced w/Pittance?
There is a real concern among those being forcibly removed from their property in NO that they will never be allowed to return.

The great fear is that the land of the displaced will be "condemned" by the Government, and "purchased" by placing on deposit a mere pittance to acquire title from the true owners.

Fits right in with the recent Supreme Ct decision which held that governments could take private property under eminent domain and give it to other individuals and groups who might bring profit to the government entity(ie. development, tourism, etc.).

Does anyone believe that the displaced transported to far off places like Utah will be able to return and fight condemnation of their properties?

And who is likely to be given the land to develop it for the profit of the governement? hmmm.... Cheney has a few ideas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course, eminent domain by nature ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes.
Condemn. Foreclose. Enter the scavenging haves and have mores.

Welcome to america. Leave your rose colored glasses at the border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. yes that was the plan.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. What do you think that $2000 was for?
"Oh, BTW, sign this ..ahem... deed thingamajiggy here. And here's your cash card, now go figure out how to buy some crack with it, you little darkies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Raise the lowest areas and return the land to the owners.
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 12:17 AM by BrightKnight
Raise the land in the lowest areas to the level of the French Quarter. The homes in the lowest areas are simply destroyed.

Provide them with grants, tax breaks and no interest loans to rebuild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC