Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spy Another Day: Are spooks getting purged for others' leaks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:29 PM
Original message
Spy Another Day: Are spooks getting purged for others' leaks?
Inside the White House war on information

by Jarrett Murphy
October 26th, 2005 3:49 PM

The shakeup at the CIA is being painted as a crusade against agency employees who leaked secret information to the media. If so, it's another front in the wider Bush administration campaign against unauthorized disclosures of inconvenient facts.

Four CIA officials have departed since the election and others may follow. New York Times columnist William Safire last week called them "pouting spooks at Langley who bet on a Kerry victory." A memo to agency employees from new spy director Porter Goss calls on them to "scrupulously honor our secrecy oath." Newsday reports that the lancing of leakers came at White House request.

With the Bush administration tightly controlling its public message, leaks have made for juicy reading recently—and have been essential to the debate over war and peace. Last month, Knight Ridder reported on a CIA study that cast doubt on links between Saddam Hussein and terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. A month earlier, the Times described a secret assessment that saw a risk of Iraq sliding into civil war. <snip>

All this takes place in an atmosphere of increased secrecy in the Bush administration. The number of documents marked "classified" increased 8 percent last year, with NASA and Health and Human Services leading the way. New employees of the Department of Homeland Security are being asked to sign an agreement not to disclose even unclassified sensitive material, although a spokeswoman says the new form just makes explicit an obligation that the department's 180,000 employees already faced. <snip>

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0447,murphy,58655,6.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've heard the CIA is losing a lot of agents but it doens't have
anything to do with leaking to the Press! It has everything to do this their new leader!!!! I listened to an interview today on CNN. A recently retired agent told of how Goss is destroying the agency. His ties to Shrub have convinced agents that nobody really wants the truth, they just want their opinions reinforced.

She said they have already lost a lot of well trained agents, and more are planning to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC