Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Looks like I may have been right about Rice"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:23 PM
Original message
"Looks like I may have been right about Rice"

http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=AC6B02C0-EBE3-9A80-CF094C1B798E1588


Back in July I speculated that Condoleezza Rice may be at the center of the Wilson/Plame leak. Now it seems like that speculation may, in fact, have been right on. While she is denying her role - the fact that she feels compelled to offer a public defense today should tell us something: namely, the sharks are circling around her and her former deputy, Stephen Hadley.

If the Times of London today is right and Hadley was Woodward's direct source, that raises a very important question: Was Hadley ordered to leak Plame's name to the press by his boss at the time, Condi Rice? In other words, Rice may not have been Woodward's direct source as she claims - but that doesn't mean she didn't give the order. Remember, as I wrote back in July, Wilson's New York Times op-ed was a direct indictment of Rice, meaning she had a personal motive. And it would be extremely hard to imagine Hadley acting alone with such a coordinated hit job on a CIA officer...Stay tuned.
----------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. And, Rice doesn't do a damned thing on her own...
she checks with the chimp first. If Hadley was ordered by Rice, then Rice was ordered by Bush. The next year is going to be one hell of an interesting time----Democrats better be prepared with a better plan. If we are, we will be in power for the next 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. We Need a Plan to Keep the Election from Being Stolen Again
It doesn't matter how far ahead we get in the polls. They can steal it.
We saw that in Ohio less than 2 weeks ago.

We have to find some way to stop them from stealing elections!


We Make Democracy DIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. They'll keep throwing flunkies out as the leakers
but we all know this is a rigid hierarchy and that none of these people will wipe their noses unless Dick Cheney tells them to first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vonslagle Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're protecting her
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 01:46 PM by vonslagle
They know that rice is the only person in America that stands a chance of beating Hillary. So they'll do anything to keep her nose clean

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Pure sci-fi unless voter faud is not addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Murder on the Orient Express (spoiler)
A perplexing case where it appears everybody had motive and opportunity. The question was - which one?


And it turns out - they all did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course she's in it up to her eyeballs
They ALL are! No one in the MSM wants to say conspiracy, but it's there! These people think and act as one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Knowing that Woodward only talks to the "top" people ...
it just has to be Bush, Cheney, Rice, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Powell or somebody on their level. Woodward did not deign to talk to "underlings". He supposedly talked to GW for several hours. And we know that Powell was one of his chief sources. Also, Rice and Rumsfeld. Whoever it is ... it's a biggie. Someone that couldn't come forward with this information during the investigation.

I just pray it's someone with prior testimony on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. But she's a concert pianist
So it's impossible that she was involved in such shenanigans. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC