Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attention '06 candidates and wannabes ....... the word this time is ......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 05:57 PM
Original message
Attention '06 candidates and wannabes ....... the word this time is ......
"Abortion"

All the other issues swirling about will be secondary. As gay rights was a huge wedge issue last time, abortion will be this time. That stupid-assed vote from the nuts in South Dakota will be the match that lights the fuse. That case will never reach the supremes, but it will be the ammunition the right wing hate mongers and religiously insane will use against our side in this election cycle. Even here in supposedly blue Maryland, our state legistature nutjobs submittied a similar bill that, mercifully, never got out of committee. But it sure did get local air time.

Now, here's a simple fact:

The majority of Americans want American women to have the ability to make their own choices in private.

That is a fact.

Your 'talking point'?

Point to your opponant and say in clear, unwavering and unambiguous words and intonation: "He will vote to take away your right to make your own health choices. I will preserve it."

Black and white.

Say it.

It feels good.

And its a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the way you put it.
"He will vote to take away your right to make your own health choices. I will preserve it." Not abortion, not choice. Health choices. Or how about "health decisions"? That has a Terri Schiavo ring to it.

See, I do hang out in places other than C&B sometimes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. fewer syllables might make it easier to say and grasp ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGrantt57 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, you're incorrect.
The wedge this time is "gay adoption."

Look up how many states have ballot initiatives to ban gay adoptions and which of those states are "battleground" states.

Karl Rove knows abortion is a dead issue with the court loaded their way. Gay adoption is the 2006 target.

Bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I disagree ......
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 06:08 PM by Husb2Sparkly
That will be background noise. First, adoption, overall, is not a front burner issue. Second, they used the gay card last time. Third, abortion is their holy grail. And with the now-packed religiously insane suprme court, the religiously insane citizens can smell the blood in the water and like sharks, they're about to go into a feeding frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGrantt57 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That will be background noise.
Nope. Gonna be front-burner in those states where Bushco and company are losing ground because of the egregious f*ck-ups in Iraq, the ports, and elsewhere.

When you're losing your base because you're hopelessly incompetent, you draw them back by making them afraid that gays adopting kids will turn all those beautiful little babies into rod sucking freaks.

Where bills are being drafted or discussed: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, and West Virginia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. All the wedge issues are background noise. The real center are more
powerful emotions, like "who's going to keep you safer?" vs, "aren't we all better off when we're all better off?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Isn't it supposed to be immigration?
Wasn't there a leaked Rove memo or something that said it would be immigration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. "no one is for abortions"
The way to frame the issue is that no one is for abortions. That we should everything we can to reduce the number of abortions by reducing poverty and teaching sexual education. Point out that the number of abortions has risen since Bu$h has become President than when Clinton was President. Then point out that you will let you make your own health care choices and not the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought it was "fear"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. This issue can make the voters see why SCOTUS is so crucial, too.
The political and social ramifications are pretty easily understood framed around this one.

Still waitimg for the DNC to put you on the payroll.

You're a genius, you really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. One "Greatest" vote here--anyone else? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. The word you're looking for is "Tyranny"
Nero refers to the government as "my government." And that includes the spectrum of denying you any health choices.

Tyranny. As in, I'm against it. Make that your focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC