Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michelman Drops Potential Indie Bid in PA-Sen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 06:24 PM
Original message
Michelman Drops Potential Indie Bid in PA-Sen
From MyDD


Michelman Drops Potential Indie Bid in PA-Sen

by Jonathan Singer, Sat Mar 11, 2006 at 05:49:53 PM EST

Last week, rumors began to swirl surrounding the possibility that long time pro-choice activist Kate Michelman would enter the Pennsylvania Senate race as an independent, potentially making Democrat Bob Casey's challenge to GOP Sen. Rick Santorum more difficult. But as Benjamin Y. Lowe reports for The Philadelphia Enquirer, a Michelman candidacy is not to be.


Abortion-rights activist Kate Michelman won't run in Pennsylvania's U.S. Senate race.

Despite pressure from abortion-rights supporters, the former president of NARAL Pro-Choice America said she would not be an independent candidate in the November election, which will likely feature two candidates who oppose abortion: Democrat Bob Casey Jr. and incumbent Republican Rick Santorum.

"Despite profound and fundamental differences, I have decided that Pennsylvania will be better served by electing Bob Casey to the U.S. Senate than giving his opponent another term," Michelman wrote in an op-ed to be published in The Inquirer on Sunday. "I do this knowing that I may forever regret not responding one more time to the clarion call of principle."


Bob Casey is not the most exciting Democratic Senate candidate in the country this year, nor is he the most progressive, but at this point, a Democratic victory in Pennsylvania is necessary for the party to have any shot at retaking the Senate in November.

In order for the Senate intelligence panel to open real investigations into the White House's case to go to war in Iraq or the Bush administration's domestic wiretapping program, Casey pretty much needs to win this fall. If the Senate Budget Committee is going to refrain from making cuts to essential programs like foodstamps and Medicare, it's almost necessary that Casey defeats Santorum. If Senate Democrats are to have the ability to vote down extreme conservatives to the federal bench, Casey almost certainly needs to win. (Even if Casey does not support such tactics, a Democratic Senate -- and thus a Democratic Judiciary Committee -- could ensure that extremist nominees never see the light of day.)

Would Kate Michelman have added to the race? Would she have made a good Senator? The answer to both of these questions is probably yes. Nevertheless, in the interest of increasing the likelihood that the Democrats win back the United States Senate in November, it's good to see that she will not make an independent bid and help split the Democratic vote against Rick Santorum, thus helpind deliver the Senate Republican Conference Chairman another six years in Washington.


Permalink :: Comment

http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/3/11/174953/491
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. A Michelman candidacy would have divided the Democratic vote
and re-elected Santorum.

Yes - I am the same "Coastie" from the 14th Ward, 18th District who periodically volunteered in Ivan Itkin's District Office across from Giant Eagle at Murray Ave and Loretta Street. I know Pennsylvania Politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm very relieved. That would have been a disaster for us and a
huge gift for Ricky and the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's an old Richard Scaife game.
There are always dissident "Independent Democrats" who will back a "Third Party Challenge" to the Democrats (that's the way both former Pittsburgh Mayor Peter Flaherty - and, to a very slight extent, Senator Arlen Specter, both got started).

I knocked around in Pennsylvania politics for a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. A sweet strategy would be to posture for a 3rd party run, take the money..
from the RW spoilers, and then withdraw and put full support behind the Dem Party. That wouldn't have to happen more than once or twice before the GOP scratches that one from the playbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You Atre A Man After My Own Heart, Sir
"That's wicked...I like it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In racing there's an old adage...
"There are cheaters and there are losers"

Right now, we are the losers. I don't advocate stealing people's votes ala Diebold, but for the most part any creative interpretation of the rules that wins us an advantage I'm happy with exploring.

It's hard to win when you play straight in a fixed casino.

And a tip of the hat to you for your kind words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I like it! Single issue politicos, are you reading this? It's a damn
good way to make an impact...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC