Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC Breaking - DON'T MISS THIS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:15 PM
Original message
ABC Breaking - DON'T MISS THIS
Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

PROSECUTOR IN CIA LEAK CASE SAYS VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY COULD BE CALLED TO TESTIFY


http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. if it's not under oath, it is a waste of time nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Martha Stewart went to prison for lying, not perjury. She wasn't under
oath when she talked to the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. As we said in school,
BFD.

"... could be ...."

That's "news"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. More...
http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/politics/14659670.htm

Cheney may be called in CIA leak case
TONI LOCY
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney could be called to testify in the perjury case against his former chief of staff, a special prosecutor said in a court filing Wednesday.

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald suggested Cheney would be a logical government witness because he could authenticate notes he jotted on a July 6, 2003, New York Times opinion piece by a former U.S. ambassador critical of the Iraq war.

Fitzgerald said Cheney's "state of mind" is "directly relevant" to whether I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the vice president's former top aide, lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned about CIA officer Valerie Plame's identity and what he subsequently told reporters.

Libby "shared the interests of his superior and was subject to his direction," the prosecutor wrote. "Therefore, the state of mind of the vice president as communicated to (the) defendant is directly relevant to the issue of whether (the) defendant knowingly made false statements to federal agents and the grand jury regarding when and how he learned about (Plame's) employment and what he said to reporters regarding this issue."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. oooooh nice
dick can't open his mouth without perjuring himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But will it be under oath??
That's all that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. yes that's all that matters
Edited on Wed May-24-06 10:45 PM by C_U_L8R
how do these crooks even get an opportunity
to testify NOT under oath... I mean.. what's the point
without an oath???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. If it's in front of the Grand Jury he'll have every chance for perjury.
Lying to a governmental agent (Fitz) who was given the powers (in this case) equal to the Attorney General...I'm not a lawyer, but it sounds like lying to Fitz is like lying to the Attorney General, as far as the Libby case is concerned.

Any lawyers not billing at this hour who'd like to weigh in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. See above^
If it's not Friday, it's not news. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Sorry. Well, I'll take a count or two of lying against Cheney, also.
Not picky here, no siree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. i had clicked on tucker's show on msnbc and he had the
(pleasure?) of announcing that breaking news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC