Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A call to investigate the 2004 election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 05:19 PM
Original message
A call to investigate the 2004 election
STEVEN F. FREEMAN AND JOEL BLEIFUSS

A call to investigate the 2004 election

By Steven F. Freeman and Joel Bleifuss | June 26, 2006

WE'VE ALL heard the story. Nov. 2, 2004, was shaping up as a day of celebration for Democrats. The exit polls were predicting a victory for Senator John Kerry. Many Americans, including most political observers, sat down to watch the evening television coverage convinced that Kerry would be the next president.

But the counts that were being reported on TV bore little resemblance to the exit poll projections. In key state after state, tallies differed significantly from the projections. In every case, that shift favored President George W. Bush. Nationwide, exit polls projected a 51 to 48 percent Kerry victory, the mirror image of Bush's 51 to 48 percent win. But the exit poll discrepancy is not the only cause for concern.

In Ohio, Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, the Ohio co-chairman of the 2004 Bush/Cheney Campaign, borrowed a chapter from Secretary of State Katharine Harris's Florida 2000 playbook. Like Harris, he used the power of his office to affect turnout and thwart voters in heavily Democratic areas. Vote suppression and electoral irregularities in Ohio have been documented, first in January 2005 by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee, and in June 2005 by the Democratic National Committee, which found, in the words of DNC Chairman Howard Dean: ``More than a quarter of all Ohio voters reported problems with their voting experience."

Election Day 2004 also saw the advent of a congressional mandate under the Help America Vote Act to replace punch-card systems with new, unproven technologies. In that election, 64 percent of Americans voted on direct recorded electronic voting machines or optical-scan systems, both of which are vulnerable to hacking or programming fraud. According to a September 2005 General Accountability Office investigation, such systems contained flaws that ``could allow unauthorized personnel to disrupt operations or modify data and programs that are critical to . . . the integrity of the voting process."

more...

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/06/26/a_call_to_investigate_the_2004_election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great piece - I hope more get a chance to read it.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. That third paragraph deserves all the weight
Everything Blackwell.

That type of suppression goes on nationwide, to perhaps less blatant degree. But we'll never get any mileage or outrage or potential correction if RFK and Freeman insist on highlighting the exit poll and therefore machine aspect.

Waste of an issue and opportunity, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, how could the Dem leadership ignore the September 2005 GAO report!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. can anyone explain why the dem. party has not acted yet?
i've been asking this question for a while and i've yet to receive anything resembling a reasonable explanation. the democrats and democracy have been raped at the polls in 2000, 2002, and 2004, yet the party is not taking direct again for democracy and against vote hampering and tampering. why? i'm begging for a serious answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They did a half ass attempt in March 05 but never bothered to review
affidavits, videos and other evidence gathered (only Conyers and the House Judiciary Dem Staff bothered to fully look at everything). Since this time, much more has come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Cause they don't want to look like complainers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Cause they are up to their ears
involved in the machines, "Whats good for the goose is good for the gander" If a Dem claims victory while using an illegal vote counting machine, He/She is no better than A Rebublican that claims victory while using an illegal vote counting machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Everyone needs to know. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingobject Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. dude, it was already investigated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Refresh my memory. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hi flyingobject!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vj68 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R Hand counts NOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC