Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which logical fallacy is the right wing most guilty of?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:40 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which logical fallacy is the right wing most guilty of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. All of them. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ringo your right
I picked one but they do all seem to apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That would be a non-sequitur answer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll go with
appeal to ignorance. They count on an uninformed, ignorant electorate that can be easily manipulated by 30 second sound bites.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd say any single answer to this question would also be a logical fallacy
Edited on Mon Jul-17-06 07:49 PM by slackmaster
Specifically a fallacy of composition, the overgeneralization that fallacious behavior by certain conspcuous members of the right wing characterizes all people on the right.

In fact the whole thread could be considered an appeal to scorn.

Of course we who are center to left-of-center are nicer because we use "nice" fallacies like appeals to emotion or popularity.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'd say we just need more data.
If we had all the data, then we could just report it and know for sure.

But, then, what would be the point of the poll- which, I suppose, is really just a matter of opinion/personal experience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Appeal to Pork Barrel Spending
A common tactic used by scientific investigators to further their careers.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. That by placing themselves first...... they will be first. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. You left out "Appeal to Fear"
I think they've used that more than the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clynnc Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Republicans are geniuses when it comes to manipulation
Why can't democrats be as dishonest as Republicans? If we were, maybe people would vote for the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Because then we wouldn't be Democrats
We tend to want to solve the problems that are really there, and that requires an honest assessment of those problems. Republicans believe no one will agree with their agenda, so they get elected on other issues and try to sneak their real agenda through. Thus, Roberts and Alito are nominated, not as the final solution to the abortion issue, but as moderate judges who will avoid judicial activism. Iraq is invaded, not as the culmination of a plan Bush's advisors had developed long before he was elected in order to control their oil fields, but as a response to 9-11, an event that took place long after Bush's advisors had drawn up plans.

Welcome to D, clynnc!!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sort of a red herring. Shifting debates from a subject they are losing
to a different one with only a vague linguistic connection, so they won't lose the first debate. I call it the "You'd do it for Randolph Scott" award. Often, Bill Clinton is the diversion. "Bush lied about WMDs to start a war that slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people." "You want to talk about liars, let's talk about Bill Clinton." That way, they don't have to admit Bush lied, and thus they can hold on to their entire framework of lies.

Other misdirects:

**Gay marriage turns into bestiality/questions about natural versus perversion.
**Failure of Katrina response turns into blaming Nagin/Blanco/Landrieu for buses/evacuation glitches/crushed cars/etc, as if these excuse Bush's failures.
**Failure of Bush to defend against an attack he had been warned about before 9-11 turns into debunked myths about UBL's head on a platter/Oliver North warning Al Gore about UBL/lists of unconnected terrorist attacks which Clinton supposedly didn't respond to. This one forks nicely into the "Bill Clinton should have kept his pants zipped" divert when you actually debunk their claims of Clinton's inactions.
**Statistics and proof of Bush's failure are also met with Bill Clinton diverts: "At least he isn't cheating on his wife with an intern."

etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Double Standards
The most common debate tactic that I see many right wingers embrace is the use of double-standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. One of the things...
(and there were many) that stands out to me about the 2000 campaign was when I saw a WV coal miner being interviewed. Of all the issues he could have remarked on, including wages, job safety, health care, social security, etc., etc. He said "Gore ain't gonna take my guns". That's ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Slippery Slope
If we let gays get married next thing you know people will want to marry their brothers/sisters, their children, their pets, their furniture--where will it end?!?!



If we allow the morning-after pill to be sold over the counter next thing you know 11-year-olds will be slipping them to their dates so they can romp in the hay!!!


The HPV vaccine is not a life saving device, it is permission for women to become raving harlots!!!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. The right wingers here on DU howling to be referred to as Centrists?
Or are you talking GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC