Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key lawmaker calls spy program illegal (Harman "flip flops")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 07:22 PM
Original message
Key lawmaker calls spy program illegal (Harman "flip flops")
12-02) 04:00 PST Washington -- Rep. Jane Harman, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, told a gathering of the American Bar Association on Friday that the Bush administration's secret wiretapping program for suspected terrorists is illegal.

Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County), who has become increasingly critical of President Bush's policies in recent months after her initial support for the Iraq war and her defense of the Patriot Act, also blasted the administration for refusing to provide legal opinions and authorizations for its wiretap program, interrogations policy and detentions of accused terrorists.

"The administration has too often operated under vague legal guidelines, pursuant to secret legal opinions generated by few and vetted by almost none," she said Friday.

House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, bypassed Harman in announcing that Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, will become chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in the new Congress. Harman, who had been backed for the chairmanship by other conservative Democrats, apparently lost favor with some liberal Democrats for not being vigorous enough in challenging the administration's policies.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/12/02/MNGKFMO5VU1.DTL&feed=rss.news

Pelosi :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to the party, Jane
Was it our shouting it into your face the last five years that finally got you to recognize the criminality of this corrupt administration, or was it something else? I'd really like to know, because I've gotten rather hoarse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'bout time, sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess Nancy won the cat fight
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Incredibly inappropriate term for what happened
Why make it sexist? It was a policy problem that the Speaker-Elect had with one of the Congresspeople. It wasn't about women fighting each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The poster was referencing a news article...
...that used that nasty expression in its headline to describe the Pelosi-Harmon situation (Yahoo! News, perhaps - I can't remember which Corporate Media Whorehouse it was). Didn't you notice the little :eyes:?

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Uh, okay
If that's the case. And yes, I missed all the subtlety and nuance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Honest mistake.
B-):thumbsup:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Better late than never
She had me cringing more than once during her appearances on the Sunday shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. See what caution gets you -- Now, if she were to Champion Impeachment
...she could take Nancy's job away from her...

...or even become the Dem Nominee for 2008.

Yes, really.

(listening AIPAC?)

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Better late than never.
More Republicans need to flip too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC