Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Julian Bond, Dissent, The Supreme Court , and the 1st. Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 08:38 PM
Original message
Julian Bond, Dissent, The Supreme Court , and the 1st. Amendment
I found this looking for something else. I thought it was timely and an interesting read.


http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-908

In 1965 Bond officially entered the political arena. The veteran civil rights activist won a seat in the Georgia legislature,
but his outspoken objection to the Vietnam War (1964-73) prompted the legislature to deny Bond his seat. Three times Bond's district elected him as their representative only to have the legislature ignore their wishes. Finally, in December 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the actions of the Georgia house were unconstitutional. Bond was sworn in on January 9, 1967, and served until 1974, when he was elected to the Georgia senate.


http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/116.html

U.S. Supreme Court
BOND v. FLOYD, 385 U.S. 116 (1966)
385 U.S. 116
BOND ET AL. v. FLOYD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 87.
Argued November 10, 1966.
Decided December 5, 1966


Several months after the election in June 1965 to the Georgia House of Representatives of appellant Bond, a Negro, a civil rights organization of which he was a staff member issued an anti-war statement against the Government's Vietnam policy and the operation of the Selective Service laws. Bond endorsed the statement in a news interview stating among other things that as "a second class citizen" he was not required to support the war, as a pacifist he was opposed to all war, and he saw nothing inconsistent with his statement and his taking the oath of office. House members in petitions challenged Bond's right to be seated, charging that his statements aided our enemies, violated the Selective Service laws, discredited the House, and were inconsistent with the legislator's mandatory oath to support the Constitution.

The District Courts decision was reversed. The entire decision can be read at the link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Back then I really believed that he would one day
have a shot at being our first Black President.

He was that impressive, to me anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I thought so, too.
I still admire him greatly. He does work that I respect, for the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. John Lewis
beat him in a race for Congress. They are both heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. He was my professor at AU
Learned a lot from him. Good man and great teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC