Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Hail-Mary Pass

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 07:44 PM
Original message
Bush's Hail-Mary Pass

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/12/AR2007011201949.html

Bush's Hail-Mary Pass

By George F. Will
Sunday, January 14, 2007; Page B07

During the battle of the Marne in September 1914, France's Marshal Foch declared: "My center is giving way, my right is retreating, situation excellent, I am attacking." His brio is remembered because his tactic worked: It prevented a rout that might have swiftly ended what might not today be known as World War I. But, then, we cannot know that.

The president's Wednesday evening address was without Fochian panache. He surely knows that he cannot know how his new policy will unfold, any more than his critics can have reasonable confidence in the consequences of their alternative policy.



The president is probably wrong in thinking that 17,500 more U.S. troops can clear Baghdad until Iraqi forces can hold it. And he probably is wrong in thinking that economic pump-priming and jobs programs, which are usually disappointing when tried in America, can succeed amid Iraq's anarchy. Besides, Shiites are not torturing Sunnis with electric drills and Sunnis are not beheading Shiites because both sides are suffering the ennui of the unemployed. For Iraqis, ennui is a utopian aspiration.

But the president is right in framing his new policy as a ukase to Iraq's government: We are buying you time, and not much of it, for you to dash to competence concerning security matters. Bush's policy probably will not succeed, but at least we will know what were the parameters of the possible, given the government produced by those Iraqi elections that once were the source of so much U.S. confidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hail-Mary!


(Sorry for injecting a bit of humor into an otherwise very serious debate, however for most of us, a bit of humor is about all we have left...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spearman87 Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pretty Accurate (NM)*
dfdefdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Bush's policy probably will not succeed"
Will some courageous pundit please ask the shrub what his plans are when Shrub's Great Adventure fails. I want to know what the back-up plan is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can't understand why democratic pundits
and politicians keep from mentioning Bush’s plan of tying funding the troop surge with funding Iraqi reconstruction.

I mean, Bush us asking us for ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS for 21,500 troops???

We have to start talking about the Hamiltons Baby. It proves Bush is a thief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow, that works out to 4.5 million dollars per soldier
Holy mackeral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. In particular,
the First Battle of the Marne involved Allied counterattacks, attacks on exposed German positions, using surprise, exploiting German mistakes, and nearly panicking the German High Command with a quick reversal of fortunes.

In short, it was good military strategy.

Moreover, the canvas in Iraq is much broader, including responsibilities for (to) the civilian population, political/economic considerations, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why, George Will, why?

You didn't raise these issues 8 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC