Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My lame reply from my Colorado Senator.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JAYJDF Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:25 AM
Original message
My lame reply from my Colorado Senator.
Here I was trying to explain how by not impeaching busch reinforces the double standard of rich vs poor when it comes to crimes.

Thank you for contacting me to express your concern about the current state of affairs in our government. Like you, I disagree with many of the policies of the Bush Administration. I understand your frustration and appreciate your taking time to express your concerns directly to me.

As you may know, impeachment proceedings against the President can only be initiated by the House of Representatives, not the Senate. House Speaker Pelosi has said that she does not plan on initiating impeachment proceedings at this time. Rather than use up the country's time on impeachment proceedings -- as many of my colleagues unwisely chose to do in 1998 -- I would prefer that the Congress get back to working on issues that affect families across Colorado and America.

Thanks again for writing.

Sincerely,

Ken Salazar
United States Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. how is that a lame reply?
the House impeaches people, until then the Senate can't do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the OP is concerned with the "Eating up precious time" thing
Wheras many folks consider * impeachment complety warranted and a damn good use of time.

I'm straddling the fence on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. but what is the Senate supposed to do?
have hearings on something they can't start? better to govern, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep. Absolutely
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The House wouldn't do it unless they felt they had the votes in the Senate
so it is a lame reply in the sense that your Senator didn't at least offer up whether or not he would look for those votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. While I would love to see shrub impeached/jailed...
I think politically it is unwise. As we saw during the Clinton impeachment, it makes the party look radical, polarizing. The Republican party is self-destructing, interfering with this could ultimatley create more backlash then its worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Read it again. There are three key words...
"at this time".

It's not a lame reply, IMO. He's telling you (rightly so) that it's the House that brings the proceedings. But he's also telling you that Pelosi's statements of impeachment being off the table is not necessarily the case. We're in the dark about 99% of what's discussed behind closed doors, especially when it comes to political matters as serious as impeachment. "At this time" gives me a glimmer of hope. Just a glimmer, mind you, but still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC