Kucinich isn't the first to call for a Department of Peace

[Flabbergasted]

Kucinich isn't the first to call for a Department of Peace -- the notion has been around since the days of Thomas Jefferson -- and it's time to put those ideas into action.

Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger. -- Nazi commander of the Luftwaffe, Hermann Goering

Back in the 1940s B.G. (Before Goering) they used to call it the War Department. Now, it's the "Defense Department," which is kinda ironic considering that our current SecDef is presiding over a pre-emptive war launched under false pretenses against a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11.

It was one big Neo-Con job with Scooter the latest "friendly-fire" casualty of Bush hawks out-of-balance world view. All yin. No yang.

And no Department of Peace (DOP), as Thomas Jefferson's homies, Benjamin Banneker and Benjamin Rush, were calling for way back in 1782.

Banneker, a celebrated African-American inventor and scientist, and Rush, a medical doctor who signed the Declaration of Independence and helped expedite the Lewis and Clark expedition, proposed a Peace Department, while the first GW talked about the need to establish a West Point-like Peace Academy.

A century and a half later, Dr. King posed two prophetic questions. Nonviolence or nonexistence? And, where do we go from here? -- which, was the title of his last book and a powerful critique of the war of his time.

Last week, I said not enough peace advocates are focusing on the details of the most important war-and-peace question: how do we get from 'here' to 'there?'

Thankfully, there's organizations like The Peace Alliance, made up -- not of mere idealists -- but forward-thinking realists who support Congressman (and presidential candidate) Dennis Kucinich's legislation to establish a DOP.

The basic idea is to "establish nonviolence as an organizing principle of American society, providing the U.S. President with an array of peace-building policy options for domestic and international use," explains Matthew Albracht, managing director of The Peace Alliance.

If you're not familiar with long and successful history of nonviolent methods or just love chugging down gallongs of Hater-ade, you'll be rolling your eyes and asking questions like: Aren't there existing agencies whose duties include components of the DOP legislation? - as if that weren't true of the Department of Homeland Security before Bush created it.

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49038/

[rodeodance]

1. thats what I call a slowwwwwwwwwwwwww brew (and still abrewing)

[AZBlue]

2. Sounds like one of the best ideas I've heard in a long time.

What you focus on is what you get. If you have departments and organizations with titles that include the words military, war, justice, weapons and so on, you're going to get violence and death. You want to put an end to war? Focus on it's opposite: peace!