Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Knew: The Clinton Surprise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 10:44 AM
Original message
Who Knew: The Clinton Surprise
Who knew? All this time we’ve been told about how “divisive, unelectable, ‘radioactive’” Hillary Clinton is, but it seems there’s something statistically wrong with what the pundits have been telling us. Go figure…

Judith Warner explains in her Domestic Disturbances column:

The shocks just keep on coming:

Hillary Clinton leads the Democratic field with 51 percent of the vote.

She beats Barack Obama by 24 percentage points among black Democrats.

She is projected now to beat Giuliani – or at the very least to be in a statistical dead heat with him in the general election.

This wasn’t supposed to happen. According to the received wisdom of those in-the-know here in Washington, Hillary was supposed to be divisive, unelectable, “radioactive.”

It was the fault of Bill and Monica, and the fact that you never knew when there was going to be another Bill and Monica. It was the fault of Hillary – for not taking the hard line on Bill and Monica the way a woman of her stature and standing was supposed to do. And it was the fault of voters – those people out there who would never, ever elect another Clinton.

Why? Because … everyone said so.

http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/20/who-knew-the-clinton-surprise/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, the republicans went after Bill Clinton for 6 years before Monica
Edited on Sun Oct-21-07 11:04 AM by niceypoo
How many failed investigations? The republicans even launched an investigation into the Clintons christmas card list. Clinton was at 70% DURING the impeachment and 68% upon leaving office. Do the math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have done the math, thats why I posted this.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was speaking to an African-American man yesterday about the support for Hillary
According to him, the reason that more Black people are supporting her is because they believe America is too racist to elect a Black president. Many actually fear for Obama's safety if he is the nom.

So that's what Hillary Clinton is benefitting from. Isn't that awesome? Yay racism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. SO the African American support they had in the 90's was due to racism?
Your post reeks of... Well I'll just say it reeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey, that's what the guy said. Take it up with him if you don't like it.
And your comment about the 90s is just stupid. Who was their alternative then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So then why did the civil right movement go forward? Didn't people die then.
Edited on Sun Oct-21-07 11:28 AM by William769
Women died during the Woman's suffrage movement. This is a man's Country and some are afraid she will be hurt just because she's a woman. Is that stopping women from supporting her/ I think not.

That is probably the worst argument I have ever heard of not supporting someone, and the worst excuse for why Hillary is doing so well. :eyes:

Who is their alternative now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Now you are just being insulting and offensive
Another addition to my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not my problem with Clinton.
Edited on Sun Oct-21-07 11:28 AM by Warren Stupidity
She represents another 4-8 years of neocon/neoliberal crap. The Republic, or what is left of it, cannot survive 'more of the same: demopublican variant'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginchinchili Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. I guess all these Hillary jokes I keep getting from various people are my imagination.
And so is the fact that I don't get any regarding any other candidate. I guess all those Clinton haters who backed his impeachment, elected a Republican president and republican majorities have sudden decided to embrace Hillary as definite presidential material. I guess the Republicans have decided forget about all the trumped-up charges they leveled at the Clintons, including Hillary's disappearing files and questionable fund raising practices. I guess the independents have decided that no one can unite this country better than Hillary, the new "uniter not a divider." The imagination is an amazing thing, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You know whats amazing, they couldn't convict him.
Not even with a simple majority vote. And what's really amazing is he left office with a approval rating that only two other President in American history can match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Proving even Republicans love oral sex......all kinds of oral stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So Hillary is riding those coattails
never really speaking her own mind... only what the polls say. if her administration will be another BILL Clinton presidency, it infers she was pulling the strings to begin with. How the Re pukes have cozied up with her, coupled with how cooperate Insurance and weapon manufactures have. Gives me a feeling of Bile kicking up. Hopefully when the other 90% of America starts paying attention. Hillary will have to stand on her own. Thus her numbers will readjust appropriately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I was just responding to what the poster brought up, take it up with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Clarification on impeachment
The vote necessary to impeach a president is 2/3 of the senators.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E01EEDE1431F931A2575AC0A96E958260


In Clinton's case they got 45 guilty votes on one count and 50 on the other (all Republicans, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC