|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:13 PM Original message |
Was Perot right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Umm, she was quite clear about her position on NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agree -- all said "amend" except Dennis who would end it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't get that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Basically, he gave a warning that should have been listened to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. "on the money?" Perot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. He damned well called it right on NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. and illegal immigration increased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Perot endorsed * in 2000. Was Perot right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I just meant that NAFTA is causing the sort of problems that Perot talked about - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. That's what I don't get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Oh -- I see your point and agree. I fell for it and I'm not even anti-Hillary! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. It's one of my pet peeves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. Sirota's article is about NAFTA, Perot AND Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Hillary has been clear about her position on NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-26-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #35 |
41. I single her out because she and her husband got it enacted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. she will continue the hemorrhaging of jobs, that is clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sailor65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. Perot was right on the money n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ross Perot was right and he was media victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudbase (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. They also brought us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Win (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Remember Perot's hockey stick? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. Pretty much on that particular item, yes. k&r (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. Perot is the reason Senator Clinton was First Lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Perot is also the reason Bush41 wasn't Bush42 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. THAT is a beautiful post! I wish I could recommend it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. BRAVO dmesg!! That needs it's own thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-26-07 03:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
43. Perot was not responsible for Clinton's victory in 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. All she can remember is a bunch of charts! That's NOT an answer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. "She doesn't CARE. She believes in the program." Damn straight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Niether of the Clintons care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. EVERY candidate except Kucinich agrees with Clinton on NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I never heard Edwards say that! I think he's open to more radical change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. At one of the earlier debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I love DK the most, but I got to support Edwards for practical reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. We built an army in the last few years. Clawing our way back from exinction! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. Kinda right. NAFTA in Perot/Republican hands is to be bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Perot was right on NAFTA, but he endorsed Bush in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Because he thought BUSHCO was going to assassinate his daughter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. I remember at the time thinking Perot had REALLY gone over the deep end - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-26-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I know how you feel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yes. Perot warned if NAFTA passed we'd hear a "giant sucking sound" of jobs going to Mexico. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-26-07 02:44 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. but then MEXICO heard the sucking sound as the jobs went to China! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. Clinton is very much a free trader. Perot was right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC