|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:24 PM Original message |
Why didn't Hillary reveal her earmarks to the public? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. was she supposed to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. no, she wasn't. But what does she really have to hide? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I have no idea. Why did Obama miss important votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thanks, but I don't see this thread being about Obama (or Hillary's vote for Kyl/Leiberman). nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:41 PM Original message |
Oh, me neither. But you asked something of Hillary that is really the norm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. the norm = same old politics....unusual = change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:44 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. yes, but why do you believe he sets the tone for any campaign but his own? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. How About Her Birthmark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because People Wouldn't Like What They See |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Obama did. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. Not one bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Obama, now he is an open and honest fella. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I like the way Obama casualizes with that no tie, open collar look..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Smear tactic. That is a photoshop. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. And Obama's face was also darkened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I think he is handsome and tough looking in this picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Except that the picture is a bad photoshop job by an Obama opponent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. We should see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Our friend was posting gushing stuff about Hillary a few months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. i would just love to have Obama blow a big puff of smoke in my face if I were that guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. You have Obama avatar, posted unflattering photo of Obama, yet back in May Hillary was "the ONE" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. and how about some answers about all those "mysterious" deaths during the Clinton years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why Are You Trivializing This? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Right - a very reasonable question. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. Because Hillary is The Queen of Senate Pork & has received more lobbyist $$ than any other candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. It is Hillary's nature to be devious and untrustworthy. Shall I mention Indian Point and Entergy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. ah .....that "entergy corporation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. I have noticed that you post lots of characterizations of Clinton's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. or the one from the other end of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Deleted message |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. What's Obama....guess he got em and is sitting on the fence with em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. No, he released them to the public. You can see them here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
20. Why did it snow on me today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. If they are not open to the public, how did the LATimes get the info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. With research, I'm sure you can find some out. But HRC's earmarks are not public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Actually, I believe her earmarks are all disclosed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC