Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The likely Iowa caucus participants think Hillary is running the most negative campaign:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:28 PM
Original message
The likely Iowa caucus participants think Hillary is running the most negative campaign:
Yesterday's MSNBC/Mason-Dixon/McClatchy poll of likely Iowa caucus participants asked who they thought was running the most negative campaign, and the results aren't too surprising:


24% - Hillary
10% - Obama
09% - Edwards
04% - Kucinich
02% - Dodd
01% - Biden
00% - Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. And yet, Obama and HRC are in a statistical dead heat. I'm afraid our Dem
candidate in the general will have to dish it out as well as take it. Might as well see the mighty Clinton machine in the primary show off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They're POLLING in a three way tie, but that doesn't mean they'll caucus in a three way tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I noticed they tied for second choice as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Digging up kindergarten essays?
Looks like we've pulled the curtain away from the Clinton and Bush machines and discovered there was nothing behind either one of them except petty vindictiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I'm not fooled so easily. Obama's veracity is fair game and he was
apparently playing coy ... pretending not to have youthful aspirations. Dunno why he exposed himself that way, but yeah - in the general - you think our opposition will refrain from pointing out the gaff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Plants, kindergarden, emails... Iowans see through her phony schtick
She's going to put it all in for Iowa and get a measly third or fourth place. Then the blood will be in the water...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Your "saint" is starting in on Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Every campaign that does oppo-research but plants and swift boating emails are 100% Clinton
And who said Obama was a saint? You and how many other hypocritical Hillaryworlders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You'll feel better in the morning. Get it all out. "nite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Bullshit. His campaign was asked for oppo research by labor unions.
Obama faxed them facts about Edwards. Do you have a problem with the truth?

BTW, every campaign does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kucinich?? A negative campaign??
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Isn't that crazy?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gee whiz, here is another poll.......
Go here and see what another poll says:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3817051&mesg_id=3817842

December 10, 2007, 1:53 pm
New NYTimes/CBS Poll: Explain, Don’t Attack

By Dalia Sussman

The latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds voters give the presidential candidates positive marks on at least one score at this stage in their campaigns: They credit them with spending more time explaining what they would do as president rather than attacking their opponents.

Still, while no candidate tested in the poll was perceived as attacking more than explaining, some candidates were given more credit than others.

Hillary Clinton was viewed as running the most positive campaign of the leading Democratic candidates. About seven in 10 Democratic primary voters said she has spent more time explaining, four times the number who said she has spent more time attacking.

Six in 10 Democrats said Barack Obama has been explaining, compared with 25 percent who said he has been attacking. Fewer, 45 percent, said John Edwards has spent more time explaining his positions, while 29 percent said he has spent more time being negative.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The NYT poll is a national poll, but this is an Iowa poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. That's a national poll, not an Iowa poll.
Apples and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. so only 24% think that?
so you can't really say "the likely Iowa Caucus participants think Hillary is running the most negative campaign".

You can say she's leading, but since 76% don't think she's running the most negative campaign, your headline is misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. No, it's actually more like 48% because 50% were undecided, of the half who were decided, 24% said
Hillary is running the most negative campaign.

The simplest way to look at is that about half of those who have an opinion think Hillary is running the most negative campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes
that's not only the simplest way, but the factually correct way to phrase it, unlike the headline of this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Did they poll the Illinois college students before they went home for winter break?
They're "likely Iowa caucus participants," even though they're "not from Iowa" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. I agree generally, but Hillary's flyer pointing out that Obama doesn't have a universal health care
plan is fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC