Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama could win this Obama-detractor's vote today with one statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:53 PM
Original message
Barack Obama could win this Obama-detractor's vote today with one statement
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 11:27 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I used cocaine as a youth, and I didn't grow horns. I didn't become a burglar or a murder. I don't recommend cocaine, but I can say from my own experience that putting something up your own nose is not the end of all hope, and certainly not the same as armed robbery and rape.

I got past my drug phase just fine, just like millions of us have. But if I had been unlucky enough to be arrested--and it is largely a matter of luck--I wouldn't be running for President today. I wouldn't even be able to vote in most States. I would have been incarcerated with violent men, and would have come out a man made of equal parts shame and anger... a man marked as life as a felon, the same as if I were a killer.

So my first act as President will be to pardon every person in these United States who has ever been convicted of a non-violent drug crime... to restore their freedom, their dignity and their right to vote."
This isn't limited to Obama, of course. I would vote for anyone who would use Presidential powers to redress a vast national crime. But I don't see that statement in the cards from any viable candidate... Nobody I support, and nobody I don't support. It would be a stone loser in American politics. I haven't heard even Kucinich or Paul invoke the President's pardon authority in the context of the drug war. This is part of the reason it is so foolish to fall in love with politicians... they are all compromised figures, incapable of doing even some basic moral things because the voters are dire hypocrites.

If cocaine is such a small matter that it should pose no impediment ot being elected President (my view), why the hell do we have so many thousands of people in our national drug gulag? Nobody could possibly be considered as president who committed any of the other crimes society considers equivalent (in terms of sentences and such) to cocaine possession.

So, if America is willing to consider an open former cocaine user as President (which it clearly is, to its credit) then why do we have all these jails? No matter which side of the drug war you're on, everyone should be able to see that one side or the other of that equation is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the advice, Karl.
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 10:57 PM by jenmito
:eyes: He already won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This thread is kind of obviously about something more than winning and losing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Did you see sandnsea's post?
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 11:07 PM by jenmito
Or aren't you interested? And I disagree with your advice. That will keep it alive. He made his claim and explained it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Saw it. It has nothing to do with the issue raised.
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 11:21 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Not everything is a partisan, candidate issue.

This isn't about Obama's character, Obama's drug policy or anything about Obama himself.

It's about societal hypocrisy as revealed through this media/campaign Obama drug story.

I used Obama because he's the appropriate symbolic voice to raise the issue I am raising, which is how cocaine can be both no big deal, and a dire crime worth locking up a generation.

Since I want a lot of prison beds emptied, obviously I think it's no big deal. But that doesn't mean it's no big deal to the voters... maybe it is, maybe not.

And Obama has no special obligation to do the right thing, versus any of the candidates. But it would be a real vote getter from me from ANYONE, though a vote loser to the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. You can't make a blanket pardon
The reason being the number of plea deals that exist. You can't assume that everybody who is in prison on a simple drug charge didn't have that charge reduced from something dangerous and serious. So you're asking for something that any thinking person knows can't be delivered.

Obama has directly addressed the unfairness of drug laws and sentencing in general. No candidate says stuff like this.

"It reminds us of the fact that we have a system that locks away too many young, first-time, non-violent offenders for the better part of their lives - a decision that's made not by a judge in a courtroom, but by politicians in Washington. It reminds us that we have certain sentences that are based less on the kind of crime you commit than on what you look like and where you come from."

"I think it's time we also took a hard look at the wisdom of locking up some first-time, non-violent drug users for decades. Someone once said that "...long minimum sentences for first-time users may not be the best way to occupy jail space and/or heal people from their disease." That someone was George W. Bush - six years ago. I don't say this very often, but I agree with the President. The difference is, he hasn't done anything about it. When I'm President, I will. We will review these sentences to see where we can be smarter on crime and reduce the blind and counterproductive warehousing of non-violent offenders. And we will give first-time, non-violent drug offenders a chance to serve their sentence, where appropriate, in the type of drug rehabilitation programs that have proven to work better than a prison term in changing bad behavior. So let's reform this system. Let's do what's smart. Let's do what's just."

http://www.barackobama.com/2007/09/28/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_26.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. And no candidate would be interested at this point, though
in a better world with less problems, I'd love to hear a candidate say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. So this whole Obama thing --
--it's more about Obama then anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, he'll get some of the Ron Paul people and the Marijuana reform party
That adds up to +-1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have a coke user in the WH now.
We don't need to "consider it"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:33 AM
Original message
Madeline, that's the first thing I thought when I read this thread..

The current resident was definitely partook in nose candy..

Only he enjoyed his with a few Brewski's on the side..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. He has proposed treatment for all first timers
and equalizing the crack and cocaine sentencing, reducing mandatories, and a host of other drug law reforms. So he has spoken to the unfairness. A blanket pledge to pardon a bunch of people with no background on each crime is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. K_H..Where is that quote from? I've never seen it before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. It's wishful thinking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. nobody gives a crap about this dumb stuff
but that doesn't mean the Clinton Camp aren't above smearing it all over like you are trying to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. So when you need a lawyer, you never tell the truth or tell him ALL of the story..
It's a mistake many people make when they hire an attorney. They never tell him the "bad" news only their version of the story. Then they wonder why the attorney lost the case. I don't want to be in that position if Obama gets the nomination and we all come to his defense and find out through GOP attacks he didn't tell us everything up front.The only ones that will ultimately lose...IS US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. You're not about to come to his defense, but your concern is noted.
As his statement said, they got through the kindergarten years, now we're into the teens.

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/obama_campaign_hi...

snip//

“Hillary Clinton said attacking other Democrats is the ‘fun part’ of this campaign, and now she’s moved from Barack Obama’s kindergarten years to his teenage years in an increasingly desperate effort to slow her slide in the polls. Senator Clinton’s campaign is recycling old news that Barack Obama has been candid about in a book he wrote years ago, and he’s talked about the lessons he’s learned from these mistakes with young people all across the country. He plans on winning this campaign by focusing on the issues that actually matter to the American people."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. If Obama is the democratic nominee...what choice do I have?
Oh please...where is that lame quote going to get you?

A coffee clatch quote isn't going to score you any points with voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. But your insinuation there's anything to worry about is ludicrous.
And that quote isn't mine. And I'm not running.


The queen! Has anyone ever asked her about her consumption of anything when she hung out with that ne'er-do-well Bill? I kid! I loved the big dawg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I'm sure everything Hillary has ever done in this lifetime..
Has been published in over 100 books somewhere...And she's been investigated thoroughly by the Republican attack machine. This is a great weakness in Obama. They can say anything they want about his drug use. And yes, it wouldn't surprise me their dirty tricks campaign could even produce a witness to all they say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. You're sure? Has she been asked lately? Full disclosure and all of that...
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 01:01 AM by babylonsister
I can't believe she didn't even inhale!

And as for Obama, it's not a great weakness; I'm 51 and I've 'inhaled' and done lots of other stuff. People don't give a crap, except here maybe to defend a woman who I wish was trying to make it on her own credibility instead of smearing someone. I know, her staff, blahblahblah, but it's getting old. What happened to being above it all? Senator Clinton is very smart and she's a Dem. I will vote for her if I have to, but I really don't like her for many reasons, all that will bore anyone who's heard me before.

As for Obama, do you really think he has skeletons in his closet if Clinton's campaign is re-attacking what he's already put in print years ago?

Finally, it sucks that Dems are attacking Dems, and this has been a real learning experience for me, and somewhat of a cooperative effortB-) . I 'tuned in' to politics on DU in September of 04, so I've gotten an eye and ear full this time around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Who gives a crap?
For better or worse, plenty of people do. Not everybody in this country is under 25 and very liberal. Some people can excuse experimenting with pot, but snorting coke on a regular basis is another matter altogether. The church crowd and conservatives had a field day when he recently spoke to some students and reminded everyone of his drug use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Restoring the right to vote of people convicted for a nicklebag of pot is important to many. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. I give a crap. So do many other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Your post is a comical partisan spasm. Try reading before spamming.
There is nothing even vaguely anti-Obama in the OP. Not one word.

It is about societal hypocrisy, as you would know if you'd read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd love it too, but it ain't gonna happen
American voters love the drug war and they won't elect politicians that campaign against it in a big way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. "I made a mistake including anti-gay McClurkin as an emcee of my event.It caused pain & I am sorry."
That's all I would need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. God this is the wishful thinking thread isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I certainly agree about moving drug addicts from prisons and into clinics for help.
How we can lock up people who are addicted to chemicals with violent criminals is an outrage.

I'm happy to see someone hitting this point.

Chemical addiction is an illness. It is not criminal to be sick.

And I'll go one further, everyone who leaves prison and who has done their time should be able to vote in elections as a citizen of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wow. That is so true and I agree with everything you typed
And I've never used any illegal drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Have to admit
That kind of statement would jump Mr. Obama way up in my eyes.

Wayyyyyy up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I would donate all I could afford to him... but we would be lonely in our support!
I fear that some in this thread think I am offering this as campaign advice to sabotage Obama! (He always listens to me)

I thought it was obvious it was being presented as a moral stance that would be a recipe for losing 50 states... which was the point of the post. The hypocrisy of a country that is more-or-less cool with people using drugs if they don't get caught, but that destroys the lives of people that do get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No. I got it.
It was one of the most poignant posts I've ever read on DU.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. I know. I think felons should vote. If the Dems do their jobs, all the neocons might agree.
Because I'm sure they won't get life imprisonment and they'll want to vote when they're out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oh shit! I thought he actually said that!
Yeah, I'd be much more inclined to vote for him if he said that. Hell yes. I probably wont for him in the primary still on account of McClurkin, but a statement like that would really bring me on board.

Unfortunately, at the moment, it just reminds me of why the guy fails to meet my expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. LOL.. Naw, this is something we aren't going to ever hear in a Presidential campaign
But it would be exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
35. No.... He has got to say coke is a stupid thing to try.
It's the role model thing. He can't come across as defending it because it becomes an attack point and the news cycle for the next two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Not suggesting he "should" politically, in the real world. It would be suicide.
But it would be a great thing to say (and do)... for any candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. K&R. By having any other stance, Obama is claiming (like Bush before him)
that:

A. His former cocaine use is a nonissue that should be forgiven as a youthful indiscretion.
B. If you do the same thing, your ass is going to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. In fairness, they all are. (and everyone mistakes their own dumb luck for virtue.)
That's what is always comes down to with drugs. We cage the unlucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. Have you read his books?
Because that was the message I took away from the chapter and mentions of drug use.

It's ironic that a Clinton would bark this out like it hasn't been there the whole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. The OP is about society, not about Obama's actual qualities. It's not a candidate thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Yes, that's what I've been thinking........
She should have least had somebody in her campaign read the opponents books......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
44. Fantastic post.
It may not be good for Obama's campaign to say what you have posted, but it would be good for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
45. I agree with you with the exception of big-time dealers. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC