Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEWEST IOWA POLL: Clinton Holds Four Point Lead Over Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:05 AM
Original message
NEWEST IOWA POLL: Clinton Holds Four Point Lead Over Obama
Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on Tuesday (Jan 1) taken Friday through Monday.

Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Mike Huckabee hold narrow leads on their top rivals two days before the state opens the presidential nominating race...

Clinton, a New York senator, maintained a stable four-point edge over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, 30 percent to 26 percent, in the Democratic race. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was in third at 25 percent, down one point overnight.

The poll of 925 likely Democratic caucus-goers and 928 likely Republican caucus-goers... has a margin of error of 3.3 percentage points for each party.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2948587520080101

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know why, but I still think all these polls are meaningless.
There are so many variables that could impact a race this close. I've been predicting Edwards would win this for a couple of months, but who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. edwards seems to be gaining, now last 2 polls have him stale and in 3rd again. crapola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That could be if the poll takers are playing
us on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. or the Pollees' are playing with us???--or both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Of course these polls don't mean much.
A caucus poll isn't the same as a typical primary-voter poll, obviously.

BTW, I don't know if Edwards will win, but at this point I'm hoping he will, just to upset stupid people like Joe Klein and the rest of the DC Villagers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I Know Why - Because They *Are* (Reasonably) Meaningless
We're talking unreliable polls for primaries that are not-very-good predictors of who gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. When the polls contradict, that means the race is simply too close to call.
That's my take on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. They all have to guess about what constitutes a likely voter
Much as I like to see polls that show my preferred candidate ahead, I have no confidence in the estimates of voter turn-out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are Iowans getting poll fatique?
I think with all these pollsters out there asking me the same question over and over I'd start making up answers.

I don't put stock in any of the polls at this point. Let's just see who's better at getting their people out to caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I was just saying... Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe Iowans should vote NOT to be the first...
but since that's all the attention Iowa gets every four years. Seriously, the democratic
should ask all Americans why Iowa should garner this much attention in a presidential election.
To me, there's simple no there there. Why do we expect something 'special' from a state
has yet to vote for a woman to higher office other than school board.

Maybe Iowans should ask this question: What's wrong with us? Why are we so far behind the
rest of the United States when it comes to women in politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's not the point
And it's not Iowans shot to call.

I think you left a word out of your post. The "democratic..."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. School Board?
Try Lt. Governor - or Attorney General - Leader of the State Senate. We should not vote for a woman just because she is a woman. We should vote for a woman because she is qualified and experienced and capable of serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. You Folks Need To Be Careful Not To Get Burned Interpeting These Polls
CNN, Insider Advanatage, and Zogby which show Hillary winning are using traditional models...The DMR poll is using a "non-traditional" model ... DMR's model is predicated on a massive, massive number of new and independent voters voting in the Iowa caucus...

We will learn shortly which model is right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. how is posting a new poll finding risking getting burned?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I Just Think Calling This Race For Obama , Clinton, Or Edwards Is Dicey
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I haven't seen anyone call this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Edwards is holding strong among second choice which could help him..."
says John Zogby in the article. Among second choice Edwards leads with 30%, Obama with 22% and Clinton with 15%. This could be significant on caucus night. This thing is still wide open. Zogby also says that he is detecting that Edwards is cutting into Obama's lead among independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton's Lead Is Unprecedented And Unstoppable!
:rofl:

How's that unshrinkable-lead thing working out these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Intrade Numbers Are Moving Toward Obama
That suggests people who talk with their money are putting a lot of stock in the DMR poll despite the fact that Hillary still lead in the RCP average...

I am afraid the "intraders" may be right:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. so now you like polls, huh?
I think the whole poll rah rah and poll pooh pooh activity is so meaningless and so transparent its pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. when have I not like polls?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Too close to call. Polls are meaningless.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. race is too close to call n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. getting dizzy now...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. looks like intraders..
are shifting their support from Edwards to Obama. The last gasp to beat Clinton.

She's gonna win handily! I can feel it in my bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Why Would People Willingly Blow Their Money?
They are betting on Obama to win IA because they believe, rightly or wrongly, that the DMR poll has captured the reality that escaped other pollsters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. My thinking is... it's a ruse..
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 12:06 PM by Tellurian
an attempt to make Obama look stronger than he is..driving the trend away from Clinton.

I don't think it will work. Clinton is too strong on "facts". It's pretty obvious she's dwarfing her opponent's mental acuity. Voters want someone who can deliver. I believe, she has accomplished convincing them!

Listening to Hillary now in Ames IA LIVE on CNN.. The crowd is LOVING HER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Riiiight...it's a RUSE...
that along with your last post that said Edwards supporters were moving towards Obama to TRY to beat Hillary shows you don't get it. If, as the trading suggests, Edwards supporters ARE moving to Obama, Hillary CAN'T win! And WON'T win! Obama is 44! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Oh, I get it now..you're just upset because I said Hillary will win handily!
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 12:56 PM by Tellurian
WAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Wow-what a short memory:
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 12:42 PM by jenmito
Post #25: "looks like intraders..
are shifting their support from Edwards to Obama. The last gasp to beat Clinton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. That is crazy...
I mean,that entire post is completely, delusional crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. What do you expect? That's from maybe the most ardent Hillary supporter here!
S/he's clearly spinning like crazy trying to justify the fact that Obama is surging and leading!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Which begs the question - how much koolaid can 1 guy drink?
It's not being "ardent" when he starts arguing that Hillary is a delicate flower simply because she is female.

That's just not the perception I have of Hillary "I vote for ALL wars" Clinton.

There was no justification whatsoever for her voting for the Kyl/Lieberman resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Good question...
Maybe it's being delusional? I see s/he hasn't come back to respond to the proof s/he asked for. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
26. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
28. If I am not mistaken, in 2004....
...the final DMR was not very close and neither were the others - but they ALL showed Obama leading a day or two before the caucuses.

Here, today, the Des Moines Register is the only one showing Obama with a lead, much less such a large one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. The DMR was the only poll that called it right for First, Second, Third. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Corrected post - the one above 28, has an error.
If I am not mistaken, in 2004....

...the final DMR was not very close (there are two DMR polls) and neither were the others - but they ALL showed Kerry leading a day or two before the caucuses.

Here, today, the Des Moines Register is the only one showing Obama with a large lead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. a little Freudian slip, I do believe
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R for Hillary Clinton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC