Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, Well. Obama Just Got Himself Scratched Off My List

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:07 PM
Original message
Okay, Well. Obama Just Got Himself Scratched Off My List
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3120460


"Obama: Gore, Kerry Alienated "Half the Country""

WTF is wrong with this guy that he thinks Little Green Footballs speaks for half the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could you please provide a link
to a video of Senator Obama uttering those words?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherokeeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Try this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Thanks! You just proved my point.
Obama didn't say anything about Gore and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. You're not that naive, are you?
Obama stepped up his argument that he's a unifying figure, suggesting that he's not only more electable than Clinton - but John Kerry and Al Gore, too. "I don't want to go into the next election starting off with half the country already not wanting to vote for Democrats - we've done that in 2004, 2000," the Illinois senator said during a stop in central Iowa.

Source: http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-usobam015521937jan01,0,4073662.story

http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2007/12/obama_gore_kerry_alienated_hal.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. No, I'm not
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 04:39 PM by alteredstate
That's why I won't buy some guy from Newsday's spin.

I'm surprised that you're buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. No, you just don't want to believe that your candidate would say such a thing. The quote is right
there for you.

I swear, the Obama apologists here on DU are just unreal. You guys will make any excuse in the book for your flawed candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I haven't seen anything that indicates Senator Obama slammed Kerry and Gore.
You can spin it, but it's just spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Then you can't read...because it's right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. Maybe someone can read it to you. Wow, DENIAL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. LOL
There's nothing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
68. LOL!!
Okay, then who ran in 2000 and 2004? Please do explain the deeper meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
73. Sounds like he is on the wrong ticket, he should try the republican party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineedchange Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. Need Real 1st Source
Please provide a real 1st source like a trasncript of the speech or a video. The source provided is suspect since I can't seem to find another source on the net confirming. Seems like a 1st source would be burning up the blogs with repeats on a story like this. The stakes are high. Don't enable DINOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would like to see the video also. If you are talking about Obama talking about polarization
than that is a different issue. We have been a polorized country since the end of the Clinton era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogishboy Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Was that when you woke up? 1/20/2001?
I guess you missed the "non-polarizing" reign of Gingrich's leadership in the House. What a Kumbaya time that was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I meant since the Clinton era.
I am not placing the blame on Dems or anything. But the country has been polarized for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogishboy Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. "We have been a polorized country since the end of the Clinton era. "
I'm really glad to learn that we have been polarized "since the Clinton era...But the country has been polarized for a long time"

Im sure you think you're making sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
53. You are right.
Gingrich served as Speaker from 1995 to 1999. He helped to bring the polarization to a new level. Of course it didn't happen over night, but the Gingrich era was marked by an intensity that damaged the country.

I also think that Senator Obama was speaking about the process in 2000 and 2004. It does not seem to be an insult towards either Gore or Kerry. More, though I think that both won their elections and had them stolen, I do not think it is offensive to say that both campaigns were poorly run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. If That Is What's Required for You to Accept the Quote
I can't help you. FWIW, ABC's Sunlen Miller has the same quote

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/12/was-obama-slamm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. If true, which its probably not, he was off the mark with that one
Gore and Kerry were not favorites of mine by a longshot, but other factors were at work, including an efficient RW hate machine, rigged machines, and disenfranchised voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. No, it's not true
He was talking about the country being divided, which it was in both elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. And is even more so now, as it should be. If he plans to bend more to the right than
Gore and Kerry, he loses my vote too, no matter what. We need to move to the LEFT, not to he THE MIDDLE, which was moved a few thousand miles over to the right, in case you missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
65. Vote for whoever you want
I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama will give away the store
But what do I know? Weak and naive, wrong on nuclear, wrong on seniors, wrong on Social Security. absent for important vote(Iran),Too willing to compromise, and just another treacherous politician to gay americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He looks so good, and so Kennedy-esque, but I'm afraid if we scratch below the surface
It would be a repulsive sight.

I am not sure exactly what lurks around in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. Speaking of Kennedy, props to DU'er Benhuert for this chart:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Wow. I'm afraid you really don't know that much.
I suggest that you try researching the topics instead of listening to the lies coming out of the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. I'v heard him, and how his talking points change
Believe me he'll return to square one. Nuclear is a part of his energy paln and he is willing to raise the age for social security. He has insulted Gays with his pandering in SC. And, as a senior, I am not about to step aside.Hillary is not much better, and will not get my vote either in CA Feb 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Given that he never said what's inside your quotes
he must never have been very far up your list anyway. So no great loss.

He's talking about polarization that has existed in this country--regardless of the candidates--which turns elections into team-sport events (my side, do or die versus your side, do or die) rather than thoughtful considerations.

So, to recap: he's not saying Gore or Kerry or whomever polarized the country ... but rather than that the country has been blindly polarized for a long time. That was the theme of his 2004 Democratic Convention speech ('there are no blue states and red states'), and it is consistent now. His whole campaign has been premised on breaking through this kind of obdurate polarization. It has nothing to do with Gore or Kerry. But that's the problem: Obama's arguments are sophisticated; the attackers don't quite understand what he is saying. That could be a problem for him, admittedly. But there will always be people not willing to listen or think.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Wow, someone with rationality. We need more of it on DU. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. You're correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
86. yeah
Cause we're all too stupid to understand.

Yeah, that's everyone except Obama supporters, stupid. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
88. What is this bullshit passive voice "has been polarized"?
Fucking Rove, the neocons and the Federalist Society have polarized us. Not to mention Limpballs and O'Lielly et al. Why is he blaming Dems? Like Obama, most have been WAY too accommodating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. oh, i thought it would be because of DK urging his delegates to go to Obama
that seemed to piss you off more. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I Thought That Was Pretty Amusing, Actually
Reading comprehension difficulties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. no
transparency difficulties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. I love you.
I can't help myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
51. Obama could use ten more or so....geez eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. He didn't even use their names.
He said that in 2000 and 2004 the country was divided and the Democrats lost.

It will take someone who appeals to Independents as well as Democrats to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Someone Here Is Either Very Dense Or Avoiding The Obvious...
I'll let you decide for yourselves, but for me what I'm getting from the quote is a bit of arrogance and denigration by Obama!

And I rarely say ANYTHING negative about Obama. I AM surprised!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
50. Well duh! That makes it even worse.
Instead of having the courtesy/guts to name them by name, he instead refers to the candidates who ran in 2000 and 2004. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #50
61. here is what he said:
"I don't want to go into the next election starting off with half the country already not wanting to vote for Democrats -- we've done that in 2004, 2000"

He doesn't refer to Presidential Candidates at all.

He refers to the Democratic Party in general and the policies that led to defeat in 2000 and 2004.

It wasn't the fault of any individual candidate, it was a Party problem.

Obama believes we must again become a Big-Tent Party to win the Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Old news and just a smear
But have a bash.
The young voters who will vote for Obama in 2 days, know that the MSM are liars and the don't buy into the Taylor MArsh DLC/Rove talking points

Nice try
NO SALE HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Heehee
From a speech given yesterday, it becomes old news?

loveit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. "Old news" - 12/31/07
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. He's still wet behind the ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. HE SAID NO SUCH THING
Read the actual Newsday blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. It's a Story Title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. I think it's sad that you're agreeing with a right-wing spinmeister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #57
83. I Think It's Obama Who Agrees with the RW Spinmeisters
That's the point. For him to go in front of Democratic audiences and say that 1/2 the country doesn't want to vote Dem - and use previous election stats where they actually DID vote Dem OR 1/2 didn't want to vote Repuke, either - that's using RW spin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
63. THAT'S NOT WHAT THE BODY OF THE ARTICLE SAYS
Who cares about the story title? This is the writer's interpretation. It's shoddy, bogus "journalism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Point to how half the country in 2000 and 2004 were NOT going to vote for a Democrat
It is a FACT that half the country in both 2000 and 2004 didn't vote for a Democrat. Are facts a little hard to handle?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineedchange Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
58. App. 1/3 of the population decides who is President
Unfortunately 100% of the voting poulation does not vote. 64% of U.S. citizens age 18 and over voted in the 2004 presidential election, up from 60% in 2000, the U.S. Census Bureau...

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/voting/004986.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Thank you for alerting people to the reality
If someone doesn't like the Third Party voters, they should look at the numbers and realize that over one third of all those eligible to vote do not bother to do so.

Those are the people who should get people's panties in a knot. The one third of all Americans who don't vote one way or another or another!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Barack Hussein Obama would make a great Mayor
of maybe Champagne or even a Chicago.

But, jumping this fast into the White House, it just isn't going to happen.

Rove and crew will be like a cat playing with a yarn ball if BHO is the nominee.

Sorry to say.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Where exactly is Champagne?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
76. U of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #76
85. Champaign. I get it now.
I was trying to understand why someone thinks Obama should be the mayor of a province in France.

When people make leadership suggestions for the people of Illinois, they could make an effort on the spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
60. Just saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
62. Well, HRC can't seemt to handle him...
What makes you think she'd do better against the republicans, or that he would do worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
66. Nice racism, yaller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. You scratched it off for nothing...nothing!.....
For one thing, the story does not show Obama saying what the headline says he said so we have no evidence that he said it at all. Second, the source is not named....it is a "person at the event". Like who, a Hillary supporter?

Here's what Obama was quoted as saying: "I don't want to go into the next election starting off with half the country already not wanting to vote for Democrats -- we've done that in 2004, 2000," according to a person at the event....

Where does this say Kerry or Gore alienated half the country?...he didn't even mention their names, let alone give them personal blame for this.

Obama is criticising the whole strategy of just trying to squeak by in an election. He is saying we should shoot for a higher goal. And, in order to do this, we have to reach out to independents and cross over Republicans. If we can't motivate more people to vote for us than in 00 or 04, we lose. It is that simple. This is not an attack on the candidates but on the strategy.

Of course, the Obama pile-on-ers won't read the story with any skepticism or perspective. It reinforces what they want to believe in the first place. So much for objectivity! But if you read what the story actually said, it did not support its headline....at all.

Newsday...not exactly a left-leaning publication...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Please. Show me where he specifically mentioned either of them.
Did you ever consider he was talking about 1/2 the sheeple in this country who would rather have had a beer with the blivet? Read what you will into it, but that's how I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. That's how I read it, too
but I guess we're just "naive" because we don't embrace some guy from Newsday's twisted words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. He didn't say that. Good try, Clinton supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
39. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Yep
and I can't believe Democrats are spreading this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
44. Aren't you Clintonites dizzy from all that spin yet?
Its certain effected your vision and ability to read and interpret...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
45. he's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. Yes
He's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. Since when was he on your list?
I don't recall you doing any more than dissing the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
College Liberal Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Thank You
I rest my case

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. Oh Dear, Well
You've made me go back and look.

Overall, the worst things I've ever said about Obama were to express the belief that his presence in the campaign served the purpose of being a lightning rod to draw attacks away from Hillary.

And look! He just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. They did alienated half the country...look at the election results!
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 07:29 PM by calteacherguy
There certainly was no mandate!

Look, I like Kerry and I like Gore, but facts are facts. Even 49/51 is alienating half the country. It's not about the election count, it's about bringing more folks over to our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
College Liberal Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. Good post and great point
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
69. Is Obama TRYING to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. sure hope so lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
70. amen!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
71. Did you hear? Al Gore said he invented the internet! Can you believe his arrogance?
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 08:38 PM by Azathoth
Nice to see the Hillaryites once again borrowing tactics from the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. um, honey, OBAMA said this, not hillary. wAKE UP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Yes, and Gore claimed he invented the internet
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 10:58 PM by Azathoth
Of course it doesn't matter if he really said it or not, just as long as his fanatical opponents keep asserting that he did.

Hillaryites are once again borrowing tactics from the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Just like your candidate, all you can do is knock Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. I freely knock Dems who borrow GOP tactics like fear-mongering, push-polling and fabricating quotes
Hence, I freely knock the Hillary campaign. It's amazing to see people who were once red-faced and frothing at the mouth over what the GOP did to Al Gore turn around and use the exact same tactics on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
72. green as can be, wonder about republican money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. repubs love obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
84. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
87. Obama's seeming acceptance of homophobia and homophobes as "okay" . . .
turned me off on him a long time ago . . . and since then, he has done nothing to improve his standing in my personal preference list of presidential candidates . . . he and Hillary are the two Democrats I would have immense difficulty voting for in the general election . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC