Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First, Pastor Donnie McClurkin. Now, Ronald Reagan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:12 PM
Original message
First, Pastor Donnie McClurkin. Now, Ronald Reagan
Which right-wing clown will Obama embrace next?



Tricky Dick?




Tailgunner Joe?




Anita Bryant?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did he just embrace all of them from 93 to present?
By calling them "The party of ideas"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Gotta love it when our "progressive" candidates embrace the dark side
What's next? Newt Gingrich was a visionary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is a bit much
Sorry...I don't see ANY Democrat embracing Joseph McCarthy. As far as I know, the only person who reveres McCarthy today is Ann Coulter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's what I thought
before I logged on and read about a so-called "progressive" candidate giving even the hint of praise to the Reagan years...and "progressives" on this board supporting that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe this guy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. How could I forget!
The King of Modern-Day GOP Clowns!

Obama probably wants to extend the olive branch to Dr. Keyes and talk to him about the "ex-gay" movement. Maybe offer his friend Donnie McClurkin's services to help pray the gay out of Keyes' daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
42. That would be a good display of "post-partisanship"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't you feel guilty for using the GLBT community as a political tool?
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 03:17 PM by Bleachers7
That's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't you feel ashamed that a so-called "progressive" spoke warmly of the Reagan regime
and you're defending that vomit-inducing statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Except for the fact that he didn't
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Uh, yeah he did
and all the parsing and contorting in the world can't hide the fact that Saint Obama just stepped on the third rail of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. blah blah blah blah blah
Your bulshit is transparent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. This person has been using gays as pawns for weeks.
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 03:34 PM by Bleachers7
And frankly, it's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What's disgusting is Obama embracing an "ex-gay" clown to headline his event
and his refusal (going on 80 days and counting) to apologize for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What makes you any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. What makes me different from Obama? That's simple
I don't hire "ex-gay" clowns to MC my events and hand them a microphone and a stage to spew homophobic filth to a receptive crowd of bigots and morons whom I'm trying to impress. I don't pander to bigots and I certainly don't try to curry favor with them.

That's just one difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. You're using gays day after day for political reasons.
Hypocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. No, I'm trying to hold Obama and his supporters accountable
for embracing bigotry for the sake of a few primary votes.

Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Sure
Whatever makes you feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Standing up against bigotry makes me feel just peachy
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. What's with you?
You seem willing to screw yourself into any position to support your leader.

I call you folks The Pretzel Movement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Each day is a fresh new hell on this board
We've gone from defending "ex-gay" bigots to lavishing praise on a criminal who occupied the White House. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
43. Cognitive Dissonance
Aint it a bitch cultist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Link please.
I want to see where he praised Reagan's policies. Not his political skill and acumen, but the ideas that make Reaganism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Silly, silly strawman
I didn't say that Obama praised Reagan's policies. He praised REAGAN, THE MAN - the all-powerful superhero Daddy figure who saved us from those awful hippies and freaks and beat the Commies singlehandedly. :sarcasm:

Here's the money quote:

"I don't want to present myself as some sort of singular figure. I think part of what is different is the times. I do think that, for example, the 1980 election was different. I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. They felt like with all the excesses of the 60s and the 70s and government had grown and grown but there wasn't much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating. I think he tapped into what people were already feeling. Which is we want clarity, we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/16/obama-compares-himself-to_n_81835.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. "He tapped into what people were already feeling"
Yes, he did.

He saw a parade of fear, denial, nationalism, militarism and bigotry ... and he got in front of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Amen
Reagan saw the worst of our society and said "how can I get that to vote for me?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Excellent analogy, let's see if he survives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Post the quote
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 03:28 PM by Bleachers7
Go ahead, it should be easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. "I think he (Reagan) tapped into what people were already feeling."
"Which is we want clarity, we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing."

You're right....that was easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. You forgot: "He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it."
Oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Oh yeah, what a stinging indictment of the Reagan Regime
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Bullshit... and you all know it.

The Clintonistas, knowing that their ass was going to handed to them regarding the blatant attempt to suppress union voters in Nevada, must have issued this little "gotcha" gem to their flying monkey hordes.
They are hoping that it bounces around the blogoshere echo chamber enough to penetrate the MSM.

Obama said that Reagan was effective... Obama went on to say that he disagreed with many of Reagan's policies.

But that's not good enough for you. That's not "pure" enough.

Reagan is dead.

I'm tired to death of his successors... Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton*.

I don't know about you folks, but I'd rather support the candidate that says a few nice words about Ronald Reagan then the candidate who's tactics are straight from Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. You must have mistaken me for a Hillary supporter and someone who gives a shit what you think
I'm. Not. A. Hillbot.

What concerns me is that this is a pattern with Obama....talking piety and virtue out of one side of his mouth while pandering to bigotry and evil on the other. He did it with Pastor McClurkin and he's doing it now with the vaunted Reagan legacy. There's a reason why it's only the most batshit insane loony GOP toadies that want to rename everything under the sun for that addled criminal.

Why in the fuck is the name "Ronald Reagan" crossing Obama's lips in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I don't care if you are a Clinton supporter or not.

If you look at the public speaking record of every politician, you'll find things that disgust you.

And you'll find them hanging around people that disgust you as well... For example: Hillary routinely meets with members of "The Fellowship" for prayer breakfasts and such. Look up "The Fellowship" and tell me that McClurkin is much much worse than they are. You can't because they are not. Yeah, I don't like Obama's allowing McClurkin to host a meeting for him... I doubt you'll find anyone on DU that thinks this was a smart move. But I'm not going to say "oh well, that's it, he doesn't get MY support because of this stupid thing", because who would I then support? Each and every other candidate has their own flaws. Edwards, for example, not only voted FOR the IWR, he co-sponsored it! Hillary voted for it and for the Kyl-Leiberman amendment, and she agreed to a "no opposition" deal for Bush's federal bench nominees. We could go on and on.

Name one politician that isn't guilty of this... let's limit it to House, Senate, Presidents, and Vice Presidents. And maybe State Governors.

You can't find one. Period.

BTW, I don't give a shit what YOU think either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. The point is not what EVERY OTHER POLITICIAN is doing...
it's what Saint Obama, Savior of Modern Politics, is doing.

Why are so willing to give Saint Obama a pass for every one of his craven, POLITICIAL actions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Hillary gig no one will talk about
from the Village Voice:


http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0509,lombardi1,61604,6...



-snip-

It came in a January 19 speech in Boston that made headlines there, with Clinton appearing in a Globe photograph alongside the host, Reverend Eugene Rivers III, one of the state's most outspoken opponents of same-sex marriage.

Clinton had traveled there to attend a benefit for Rivers's youth-outreach program, known as the National Ten Point Leadership Foundation, which promotes faith-based solutions to gang violence and urban crime.

-snip-

The affair's host was Reverend Eugene Rivers III, the spiritual leader of the Pentecostal Azusa Christian Community and a prominent black minister willing to do business with the Bush White House. On January 25, he was among a coterie of clergy who met with President Bush in Washington. His Ten Point foundation has benefited from federal funding thanks to the administration's faith-based program. And Rivers has appeared in documents issued by the White House Office of Faith-Based Initiatives pushing one of its most controversial elements—that faith-based agencies be allowed to ignore state and local anti-discrimination laws but still receive federal money.

from the Village Voice:

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0509,lombardi1,61604,6.html/full


-snip-

It came in a January 19 speech in Boston that made headlines there, with Clinton appearing in a Globe photograph alongside the host, Reverend Eugene Rivers III, one of the state's most outspoken opponents of same-sex marriage.

Clinton had traveled there to attend a benefit for Rivers's youth-outreach program, known as the National Ten Point Leadership Foundation, which promotes faith-based solutions to gang violence and urban crime.

-snip-

And then there's his outspoken stance against same-sex marriage. Last year, in the battle for civil-marriage rights for gay couples in Massachusetts, Rivers aligned himself with the most extreme opponents. He showed up at forums hosted by the anti-gay Family Research Council. He lent his celebrity to a radio ad paid for by Your Catholic Voice that declared: "Same-sex unions are really about 'special rights' for a special interest group."

Just a week before he shared the spotlight with Senator Clinton in Boston, he sounded a similar theme at Calvin College, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, arguing in a January 11 address that the words "civil rights" have been co-opted by those who support full equality for gay couples. Then Rivers revealed his true conservative colors:

"Frequently, same-sex couples wanting to marry are white lesbians who seek the accoutrements of family life and the proverbial white picket fence," he told the crowd. "From their positions of socioeconomic privilege, they insist that their desires must be viewed as rights instead of preferences."


-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Who's talking about Hillary?
Not me. I'm not supporting her...not in the slightest.

Why is Obama waxing nostalgic about Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Would it surprise you that Hillary
also regularly attends prayer breakfasts and meetings with members of "The Fellowship".

She does.

Do a little reading on the membership of "The Fellowship" and their influence in the corridors of Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of the four people pictured in this thread so far, half of them have gay children
Alan Keyes and Anita Bryant.

(And Ronald Reagan Jr. is at least a honorary gay man. Sexual behavior aside, dude's pretty sophisticated.)

Add Cheney to the mix, and we have to ask ourselves...

Isn't it better for these people if they admit it's not a choice?

Because if it IS a choice, it's a choice caused by having RW assholes for parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. That is interesting
thanks for pointing that out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. Funny!
:rofl:

He will say something nice about them all. Yet we have to hear one nice thing from Obama about progressives/liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Obama says "progressives/liberals/LGBT folk - get to the back of the bus!
I got an election to win!

OBAMA '08: PANDERING FOR VOTES...BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC