Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media has found the REZKO story.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:34 PM
Original message
The media has found the REZKO story.
All Hillary had to do was say the magic words:

Slum lord.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/


*** Obama’s tough press day: Rezko is EVERYWHERE today. The Clinton campaign always wondered what it would take for the media to cover this story nationally. Well, have the candidate utter the words "slum lord" in a debate and voila. It's easily Obama's worst free press day of the campaign. It’s also a bit ironic, too, given that the Clintons have had many more problematic donors than Obama (Hsu, Gupta, Chung, Denise Rich, those donations to the Clinton Library). Then again, the point of the Clintons pushing Rezko is to make Obama look like just another politician who got caught up with a questionable donor. And if the Clintons can prove Obama's no better than them then they can beat him on other points. It’s also worth asking why Rezko, and not Wal-Mart, is getting all the play today. The Clintons -- at least in the short term -- won the spin war after a debate that looked like a draw to us. Meanwhile, the Obama folks are pushing the two Clintons vs. one Obama story, and it's getting its share of pickup. But nothing like Rezko today.

..

OBAMA: Tons of Rezko stories today. The New York Times: "Still, Mr. Obama’s relationship with Mr. Rezko remains controversial. In 2005, Mr. Obama bought a strip of land from Mr. Rezko even though the developer was under federal investigation. And while Mr. Obama has not been implicated in any wrongdoing, his campaign announced Saturday that it would give to charity more than $40,000 in past political donations that were linked to Mr. Rezko."

Chicago Sun-Times' Sweet looks at the renewed focus on Obama's ties to Rezko: "There are indications that Clinton and her allies will continue to press Obama on Rezko, especially as the Feb. 5 votes are looming in 22 states and Rezko's trial is near. Meanwhile, Rezko hovers as an issue for Obama if he gets the nomination."

The L.A. Times also does a Rezko story. "Obama campaigns for president as a new kind of politician, less beholden to special interests than his opponents. He and his staff regularly contrast his policy of refusing to accept donations from lobbyists with Clinton's practices. His relationship with Rezko may undermine the power of that claim."

The Chicago Tribune: "Beyond the heated sound bites is a story of a more complex relationship that long boosted Obama's political fortunes but now could prove a campaign liability. For years after Rezko befriended Obama in the early 1990s, he helped bankroll the politician's campaigns. Then, after Obama's election to the U.S. Senate, Rezko engaged him in private financial deals to improve their adjoining South Side properties. Those arrangements became a source of lingering controversy after the Tribune first reported them in November 2006.”

“Now Rezko's federal corruption trial is scheduled to begin Feb. 25. As Obama stumps for votes, coverage of the high-profile proceedings could bring fresh, unwelcome reminders for Obama of Rezko's influence in the same Illinois political world that propelled the senator to a serious run at the presidency."

The Boston Globe re-examines the relationship between Obama and real estate developer and fast-food magnate Tony Rezko. “Obama has also been forced to explain how Rezko got tangled in the purchase of the Obama family home and other ties to Rezko, some of them going back more than 15 years. If federal prosecutors are right, his ties to Rezko may mean Obama's campaign unwittingly accepted money generated by illegal activities. Obama, who has an unblemished reputation after 11 years in public office, has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's about freaking time....
maybe now, they'll dig into the Byrd thing too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Note this sentence:
Obama, who has an unblemished reputation after 11 years in public office, has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Uh huh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. News media campaigning for Obama
no doubt they'll find plenty of blemishes to report during the GE if he wins the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ruh-Roe
Its gonna be hard to paint the entire MSM as racists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. The irony is amazing.
Clinton pointing fingers about knowing people who've been indicted, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Clinton never claimed she is bringing a new kind of politics like Obama
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 08:37 PM by Herman Munster
Exposing the hypocrite and poser for what he is, well that's fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hillary's trying to drag him down to her level, eh?
Kind of like when GWB slurred Kerry as somebody who didn't serve valiantly in Vietnam?

Yeah, sorry, I don't go for that thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. it doesn't matter if you go for it or not
Obama is being vetted. Believe me, Hillary is hitting Obama with kid gloves. What the republicans do to him will be much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Right, that's how the "big lie" works.
You just keep repeating obvious lies, and stupid people eventually believe them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. that is true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. If Obama lied about his connections
With Rezko, then he has alread been down to that level, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. And why did he lie repeatedly? What does he have to hide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the other candidate wants to keep his wife's involvement
with the board of WALMART quiet....after all if Hillary gets slammed for being on the board and RESIGNING shouldn't his wife???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. She wasn't , as you know, on the board of Wal-Mart
She was on the board of a pickle and condiment company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Link, bitty wit? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. babylonsister
I'm sorry... :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Hmmm... "Obama called hypocrite for wife's Wal-Mart link ..."
Damage Control's a little late "The wife of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama resigned Tuesday from the board of a food supplier for retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc., a target of criticism by the Illinois senator" http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3202577

... "Mrs Obama, 43, was re-elected to the board last month for a further three years..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/13/wobama13.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Wow, she sold them pickles. She didn't decide their union strategy
as their board did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. I only posted as a reply
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 10:53 PM by DianaForRussFeingold
:dem: better we know now than later... You know I'm not a fan of Hillary's either. You can try and do some damage control. in defense of Obama's wife,that's different than being on the board of directors of all of Walmart.. it's one small division-- I posted because I feel the media is making it a bigger deal than it is and you deserve, the fair and balanced--truth... edited to add -we 'all' deserve, the fair and balanced--truth
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. I'm confused about the dates myself. nt
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 10:25 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Better now than during the general. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. I agree the voters need to know ,,
"As the Illinois senator prepared to join the presidential fray late last year, he threw his weight behind the union-backed campaign against Wal-Mart. He declared that there was a "moral responsibility to stand up and fight" the company and "force them to examine their own corporate values".

According to the couple's tax returns, Mrs Obama earned $51,200 (£25,700) for her work as a non-executive director on Treehouse's board last year, on top of the $271,618 salary she was paid as a vice-president of the University of Chicago Hospitals.

She also received 7,500 Treehouse stock options, worth a further $72,375, as she did the previous year, when she banked a $45,000 salary from the company.

The apparent contradiction between Sen Obama's political calculation to join the Wal-Mart-bashing lobby, and his wife's profitable role with a company that makes money from Wal-Mart, is being closely scrutinised by "opposition" research teams working for rival White House candidates, The Sunday Telegraph has learnt." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/13/wobama13.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Link from last May? I don't know. Maybe December. Would be nice
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 10:24 PM by babylonsister
to know.

Edited because I don't know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Original message
Maybe they'll dig into that

Jeffery Epstein thing

Ron Burkle thing

Marc Armand Rousso thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Your own quotes say "Obama has not been implicated in any wrongdoing".
So this is more of your usual Obama-hating bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bye-bye, Barack. This is your scream moment.
We've had enough crooks in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't we want to know the truth?
:shrug:

I know I do and it's nothing against Obama in general. If he has some baggage, let's get everything out in the open. If it's nothing...cool. If it's not, then I think the American public deserves to know what a candidate they may potentially cast their vote for is up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. And Hillary was smart enough to wait until Obama gave her an opening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. WEAK........Voters aren't concerned about that Weak
Bullshit. They'll have to come with better than that. If thats all the Repukes also have, he is in good shape
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is what is known as being "vetted"...better for us if Obama is found out to be a cretin...
...NOW not later. If he were to get the nomination the repubs would rake him through the coals. Senator Clinton is doing him a favor (of sorts) in bringing this to the fore before it could damage his reputation.:evilgrin:


Thanks for posting this Herman.:hi:

:kick: and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Exactly, the primaries are vetting time. Hopefully we'll come out with a clear winner either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks for the post and the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. The thing is, this is the big story out of the debate nothing else

We were right, we knew as soon as she said it, tomorrow would be, "who the hell is Rezko?" and boy were we right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. What Obama says today,
he'll deny tomorrow. Should be a bumper sticker.

Put him on a polygraph and the needle would go crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko
Both men declined to comment on their once-close friendship. Obama has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko and has insisted that he never used his office to benefit Rezko.

Thus far, there is little in the public record to suggest otherwise, and the few exceptions that have come to light appear minor. On Capitol Hill, Obama once gave a summer internship to the son of a Rezko business associate on Rezko’s recommendation. Earlier, as a state senator, Obama was one of several South Side political and community leaders who wrote state and city officials urging approval of public funding for a senior housing project involving Rezko.

But when Rezko pushed for passage in Springfield of a major gambling measure, Obama vocally opposed it.

-snip

Still, the Clinton campaign, fearing an Obama triumph in the South Carolina primary this weekend, is ratcheting up its rhetoric against the Illinois senator, in the process hoping to bring new attention to his relationship with Rezko.

It’s easy to forget today, but in the years before 2005, Rezko enjoyed a reputation in Illinois as an up-and-coming, even enlightened entrepreneur with a strong interest in the risky low-income and affordable housing markets that relied on tax credits and other government assistance.

He also was a reliable source of campaign cash for an array of politicians from both parties.

-snip

Law firm partner Judson Miner said that, over several years, Obama did a total of five to seven hours of billable work on Rezmar-linked projects. He mainly filed incorporation papers for the non-profit groups under the supervision of more senior attorneys, Miner said.

At the Tribune’s request, Cook County Circuit Court Chief Judge Timothy Evans produced a list of all 260 civil and criminal cases in which the firm filed appearances, and the Tribune separately examined 1990s lawsuits that Rezmar Corp. listed in applications for government grants. The paper also examined files from the Illinois Housing Development Authority and the city housing department, as well as the hundreds of clients Obama listed in the unusually frank ethics disclosure reports he filed as a state senator from December 1995 through April 2004.

Those and other records disclosed five instances in which Obama did legal work for ventures that included Rezmar Corp. The case of City of Chicago vs. Central Woodlawn Limited Partnership is one example.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-obama-rezko-clinton-080122,0,5430503.story?page=1&coll=chi_tab01_layout



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. He's every bit as guilty as Hillary was in Whitewater.
So if the press pays as much attention to Rezko as they did to Whitewater and cattle futures, they will be treating Obama fairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC