Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican primary voters vote for who the Establishment tells them to vote for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 05:19 PM
Original message
Republican primary voters vote for who the Establishment tells them to vote for
The only time this rule was not true was in 1964, when Barry Goldwater's movement conservatives took over the party. Otherwise, when Republican Establishmentarians send the message out that this is Our Candidate, the primary voters are expected to follow, and they do.

Nixon in 1968, Ford in 1976, Reagan in 1980, Bush, Sr. in 1988, Dole in 1996 and Baby Bush in 2000. Democrats, on the other hand, are more welcoming of insurgent candidates, such as McGovern (1972) and Carter (1976).

This year the Establishment seems more divided on a candidate, but as soon as they coalesce around one man, you can bet that the voters will follow, being the good little stormtroopers that they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. They'll see after the shakedown from FL and SC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjones2818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny thing...
so do the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. What you say can be equally applied to the Dems too
Welcome to the two party/same corporate master system of government.

As far as McGovern goes, yeah, he was a maverick, one that the party bosses didn't expect to get the nod. But you know what happened when he did? The party bosses and machinery withdrew their support and money, leaving McGovern to sink or swim on his own. It wasn't so much that Nixon destroyed McGovern, his own party did that to him. Nixon just performed a mercy killing, that's all.

As far as Carter goes, he wasn't an insurgent candidate. Yes, he was a bit of a surprise, but hardly an insurgent. Rather he was a centerist whom trusted, which counted for a lot post Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC