So, instead of discussing Bush's false claim on Iran's "nukular" program, we're talking handshakes?

[mzmolly]

Do I have that right? :eyes:

[NastyRiffraff]

1. Yep, you got it.

I've stopped counting the stupid handshake threads. Sometimes DU is worse than the MSM.

[fenriswolf]

2. oh not just handshakes

were talking about what a f!@#%!$ obama is for snubbing hillary

what a saint is for hillary vainly attempting to shake obamas hand

obama shaking GW hand

and edwards shaking his head

and me shaking my head at all this stupid shit!

[mzmolly]

3. Ahhh, missed the Edwardian head shake.

Thanks for the report. ;)

[nadinbrzezinski]

4. Yep, you got it right

and truth be told, the MSM has set the conversation AGAIN.

[Catherine Vincent]

5. Blame Obama.

All he had to do was nod and shake Senator Clinton's hand. He knew the cameras would be on them.

[JeffR]

6. Seems to be it

but please, don't wake anyone up in their sleepwalk to the abyss. Shhhhhhhhhhh.

[lakeguy]

7. m$m, 1

the people, 0

[sjdnb]

9. Ah, it's more than that, they pick our nominee ... well, them and all the

power brokers and handlers who present to us what they want us to believe about whoever they want us to support.

[aquart]

8. It's not like we're gathering evidence for impeachment.

Add it to the list and just go about your business.

[mzmolly]

11. No, but I am gathering evidence for ignorance and a lack of focus

on what actually matters.

[John Q. Citizen]

10. I just got here, but from the multiple subject lines on the latest page that seems to be the

most important aspect of the entire evening.

Pretty pathetic.

[Maddy McCall]

12. Yep.

[mzmolly]

13. Strike one up for the idiot in chief huh?

Blech!

[ursi]

14. either there is plethora of juveniles chatting or we are being inundated with Clinton campaign

staffers and volunteers. It's confusing sometimes.