Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

110.54% Voter turnout in Broward County, FL precinct

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:10 PM
Original message
110.54% Voter turnout in Broward County, FL precinct
It looks like the good people of precinct D001 in Broward County, FL have quite literally given 110% in the primary!

Here is a handy little map that you can get to from the Broward County Supervisor of Elections:

http://enr2.clarityelections.com/Default.aspx?page=VT&c=broward&eid=270&lid=1&ref=false

It shows the voter turnout percentages as a color scale on the map. There is one precinct that stands out in green (90-100% turnout according to the legend). Click on that district to bring up the detailed info and it brings up this:

http://enr2.clarityelections.com/Default.aspx?page=VTD&c=broward&eid=270&lid=1&ref=false#D001

which clearly shows 110.54% voter turnout for that district.

Is this some kind of mistake or are they not even bothering to hide this stuff that well any more?

Either way there is something very wrong.

As a side note, there were 3 times as many absentee ballots requested in Broward County for this election than there were in 2004 (Though that may be attributed to incumbent / lack of a republican primary in that election)
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-flbearlyvote0121sbjan21,0,950033.story

Good job they use touch screen voting down there or they might have run out of paper ballots...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. None of these elections are legitimate
Let's just ask Diebold and ES&S who they want to win and have the Supreme Court select that candidate. It would save a lot of time and trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is so like the old USSR. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The post is making me laugh, but it seriously is no laughing mater....
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:13 PM by LakeSamish706
Once again it would seem that these machines give proof to just how an election can be flawed with no paper trail for backup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am amazed that this doesn't raise any automatic flags.
You would think that when these results are tabulated, there would be something somewhere that would would alert on something so obviously incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama lost so...where's the recount....? Recount ! Recount ! Recount, Now...! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. My posting of this has nothing to do with Obama losing.
Election error/fraud should always be investigated. I'm not suggesting that they do a recount (I don't think it would show any different results). I am simply saying that there is something that needs to be investigated here.

This may be due to election fraud.

This may be due to faulty reporting from the precincts.

This may be due to someone simply typing in the wrong number for the number of registered voters.

Just when an error stands out as obvious as this one, it is mind boggling that no one looks into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. *sigh*
It's really hard to see a point in trying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Effin hell! We will not have a clean vote until we get rid of EVMs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good ol' Broward.
You can always depend on them to make a mockery of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes you can....
Just makes you wonder if it is through maliciousness or incompetence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well 110.54% turnout Does NOT trigger any kind of alarm in Florida....
After all.... Huckleberry asked his supporters to vote multiple times before the Primary, remember?

I would imagine that 133% turnout would raise an eyebrow, but they were way below that amount here.

All is well.... nothing to see..... move along...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. and i thought cook county was crooked
vote early and vote often!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. oooops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Vote early, and often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MammalSauce Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. A few numbers to consider
It looks like the discrepancy mainly comes from a Property Tax Question. 683 voted Yes and 328 voted No (1011 total). There are only 930 registered voters in that precinct.

Also, there were 786 total votes in the Democratic primary. That seems like a high turnout for an irrelevant primary, but that doesn't really prove anything.

There were 181 votes in the Republican primary. Adding the Republican and Democrat votes, that comes out to 967 votes.

Those were the only things that really stood out to me. Anyone can download the results here http://enr2.clarityelections.com/Default.aspx?page=R&c=broward&eid=270&lid=1&ref=false

I used the excel spreadsheet to get my numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. The signficance of the Property Tax Question is
that is would be the only question that was available to all voters (Registered Democrats, Republicans, and indepentants). Since Florida has a closed primary, ballots for independents would only have the state, county, or city questions/amendments/etc and would not have candidate choices. I'm not sure what local questions were on the ballots in that precinct, but the Property Tax Questions was a state-wide question. So the discrepancy between the 786 Democratic votes combined with the 181 Republican votes (total 967) and the 1011 votes on the property tax can be accounted for by the independents that could not vote for a candidate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. Summary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC