|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:37 PM Original message |
What the Nominee will be up against come November: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not even remotely worried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Wisconsin was close in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. It's SO different from 2004, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Go Ohio! (We won't win Florida) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Ohio is trending blue, and I agree with you it's the best November bet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. We will w/Hillary. She got a lot of votes in the primary - even though it didn't count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Not against McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. I agree it's all about Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Just as in 2000 and 2004, it's all about southwestern Ohio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Thanks so much for the info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. 11 states had 5% or less difference; 10 more had difference between 5-10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. more numbers: this year's primaries for 15 closest states in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think that Fla, Ohio and Iowa can be in play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. All we need to do is win the same states in 2000 and 2004 and New Hampshire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. New Hampshire alone won't do it anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Which is why we need low Republican turn-out and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. Still thinking it will be easy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. "Very much likie" is probably true, but not exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. ALso CO, NH, and OH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I'm underestimating nothing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I totally agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. I'm beginning to agree with you................ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Oh goodness! I never said it was going to be a cakewalk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. this is NOT 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. The last time Virginia went for a Democrat was 1976 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. They have a Dem governor, elected a Dem senator in 2006, and are on track to elect another Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Most analysts disagree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. It's not 2004, but the list of swing states won't be drastically different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. True. The difference is that there's a much, much better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
24. Obama takes every Kerry state and more - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. Texas will go BLUE if Obama is the nominee! Bookmark this - I'm calling it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I'm bookmarking! 2004 bush 61%, kerry 38%. I'm in texas NO WAY goes blue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
30. Yeah, but, look at this, for crying out loud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
31. There is no comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC