|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:28 AM Original message |
Clinton "Grasping At Straws" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is right where Mark Penn wanted to be, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. "If she 'goes negative', she's toast..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisa58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. why isn't she fighting for Wisconsin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. she really doesn't seem to be fighting for our votes here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. She should phone up Eli Manning and ask how New Yorkers win in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Yes, that's very puzzling. She's competitive there and it will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. "Going negative" is no longer an option... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. Going More Negative Than Race Baiting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. You read my mind.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Should be interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. If she tries to cut him off at the knees with negativity, or tries to leave him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I hope that's not the tactic she settles for; that could have the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Thanks for the link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. It would also show that she is just for herself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Hillary needs to not carry this so far as to damage the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Don't you get it...it's not about the Party...it's about the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Yes--well-said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. The superdelegates would punish her for going too negative at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. one political hack's opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC