|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:32 PM Original message |
It doesn't matter if Clinton's campagn is responsible for the photo; they're being blamed anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Do you have any doubt that they did it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I honestly don't know who did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Drudge is saying that they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's Drudge.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. I bet this time he has the evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Is this the same Drudge that claimed Kerry and Edwards had girlfriends on the side? AND if there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Kerry denied that story, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Did you see their responses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. DUPE thread. We are getting up past 20 on this same topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. The photo went out to 3 million on 2/7 via GOP MEDIA- so Obama's now upset? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. You keep posting this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Thank you; that's my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Oh come on, the muslim emails were out for a long time also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. So you're cool with HRC circulating Republican smears? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. Photo from National Enquierer (3 million readers) weeks ago - and so Obama wants us to hate Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Her campaign needs to speak out then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That's the whole point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. And say... what? "Jesus H Christ, are you people fucking stupid or what??"" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. "No member of the Clinton campaign was involved in the circulation or distribution of the photograph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. What Photo??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. He did a dress up deal overseas a while back, and the National Enquirer ran the pic weeks ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. And for some reason, Hillary issued a statement in which she did not deny circulating it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. "No comment" does not mean "I microwave kittens" no matter how hard you wish it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. The fact that the picture has also been previously used in RW smears does not actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
18. A clear "We have absolutely no connection with this photo" from HRC would clear things up, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
19. The Clinton Campaign is doing what Jesus did. Got a problem with that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
22. THEY DID NOT AND HAVE NOT ISSUED A DENIAL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. IT WAS IN THE PAPER WEEKS AGO! GET A CLUE! YOU WERE PLAYED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. IT WAS IN A RW SMEAR PIECE ABOUT AL-QAEDA WEEKS AGO! THAT MEANS IT'S OKAY FOR HILLARY TO USE IT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Only a true Cult member would delude itself into calling the supermarket tabloid "RW" - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. You think a hit piece claiming a Democrat has "al-Qaeda ties" is not RW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. They don't have to answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Yeah, they don't have to do anything. Just sit back and screw the Democratic Party. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. BINGO! I called it! I said the DUbamas would spin Clinton not being guilty into an evil plot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. You need a reality check and a new username. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. You just keep on tellin' yourself that, dear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
32. Any old smear or lie can surface. They aren't responsible for every ignorant post or article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. But yet they gave a direct response. Just not a denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC