Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Hillary Presumed Guilty?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:54 PM
Original message
Why is Hillary Presumed Guilty?
Where is the proof? The Hillary hate is really getting ugly. Until she is proven guilty stop throwing the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probable cause.
And a recent history of mud-slinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yep, and Hillary never used the term "spade" either, did she?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. HOMOPHOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I'm full of hatred?
I'm not the one who called Obama a "monkey," pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. And you *never* Provided me with a link to the thread where that "incident" "happened"
so I think you are either misinterpreting what "I" "said", or you made it up out of whole cloth..... I am leaning towards the latter as that seems to be an Obamanation tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. You're projecting.
More irrational bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. When her campaign doesn't deny circulating the photo it's looks pretty bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. because her campaign didn't deny it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. pretty hard to deny something when the allegation is against generic "staff"
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM by jsamuel
could have been some staff member in one state and the campaign doesn't know if it was or not. They probably would not want to deny it until they are sure that no one from their campaign did send it out. That is just one example of why they would not specifically deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Actually, it's pretty damn easy. If they're staffers,
their emails will all be routed through their intranet servers. Doing a database search would take literally seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Why not say, "We don't condone sending emails to rightwing sites,
and if someone on our campaign is found to be responsible, they will be (blah blah blah)"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. If that was the case then they ought to have kept quiet period OR
Denied that Clinton would EVER allow that kind of crap to be let loose and vowed to track down the rouge and fire him/her.

No instead they are fiddle farting around and making crap statements.

They got caught throwing crap sorry that people cant accept that. Every second she does not say this is not her adds to her political guilt.

Atleast I can give her credit for not outright saying she or her staff diddn't do it which is likely a lie. Like I said Clinton you still have a chance to hold on to enough of my respect for me to consider you in 2012. Exit now and gear up for 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. When you are Guilty
the first thing you do is deny deny deny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. When you are guilty and you worry there's evidence, the first thing you do
is change the subject--which is what her non-denial email did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Probably because it was assumed she should have the most to gain by hurting Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Charge made by several outlets. Lack of denial in her statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because she has a track record.
And the smear merchants on her payroll have one too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fool me don't get fooled again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because HATE lurks behind the HOPE and UNITY facade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because she's not St. Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC