|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:33 PM Original message |
I don't know about you, but my old tax returns are sitting in a file cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Um |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. From the debate last night, when Senator Clinton said something to the effect that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Clinton fumbled around on why her tax returns are unavailable, saying she "hasn't had time" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. I really doubt if she handles her tax returns herself. She probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. but this issue has come up before, and it keeps getting avoided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. It is not complicated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. She knows that she will be grilled on its contents, and may want to have explanations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Even better: one phone call and her accountant can look for it for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. What about your checkbook? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. And I'm guessing that those accountants who many have do their taxes, have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. you can always xerox them a copy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. They're probably already in pdf form and on a disc. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. that was a lame play on the debate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Ha! Sorry - It IS funny and clever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flor de jasmim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not only that, but she acts like she personally would have to retrieve/prepare them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. She thinks people are stupid enough to believe that crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ExtraGriz (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. is there a legal basis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Obama has made his public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Anti-Bush (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. It's about transparency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. It is about demanding voluntary invasion of their privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. We're simple folk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Obama is a public figure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Ya you're right... see below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. There's absolutely no way to compare tax returns of BO to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Explain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Before or after he paid rezco back the money? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. point being, we know all about Rezko and that there's nothing wrong there. Clintons, otoh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
9. Mine aren't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. Clinton's been too busy to get that info to the public! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. No matter what's in it, she will be criticized. Should've released long ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. But she'll have them to us by the end of April.....say the 23rd?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. Why should anyone provide that info before they obtain the nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Because promising to release them after they obtain the nomination suggests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. She says she's been fully vetted, but won't release her returns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
33. Aren't We Talking About The Currently Due One? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. No, we are talking of her 2006 return. OB released his 2006, HRC has not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
34. I've got mine saved on my computer. Wanna see? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
36. Great. Why don't you send 'em to me; would you like my address? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
38. Ready on Day 1??? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC