Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton coming out against a do-over in Florida is going to play very badly for her...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:54 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton coming out against a do-over in Florida is going to play very badly for her...
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:05 AM by scheming daemons

61% of Democrats want both Michigan and Florida to re-run their primaries.


Hillary has now publicly come out against this. If Obama comes out tomorrow with a forceful statement saying that he agrees with June primaries for Michigan and Florida, he has the high road... and will get very positive pub over it.


Hillary will look like a conniving cheater.... which is ironic, because that's what she actually is... by trying to stick with the results of tainted faux primaries from January.


It's a win-win for Obama.... the voters of Florida and Michigan will look very kindly on him for supporting their right to have a REAL primary.... and he will most certainly do better than the 50-33 loss from the faux Florida primary in January and the 55-0 loss in the faux Michigan primary.


Take the high road, Barack. It will work out VERY well for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you have a link about Clintons statement?
I didnt hear about that.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Olbermann played a clip of her saying that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Here's a thread about it:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Thanks! She still wants uncontested delegates.
She can go to hell in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. That doesn't make sense? Florida was more toward her anyway
do you have a link?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Olberman had a sound bite of her saying she is against a re-run...

... and she "won" the first time 50-33.... Edwards was still in it. Obama would surely do much better than that the second time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. OK, thanks for the clarification. What was I thinking, of course it isn't out of principle
but just the opposite

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. That's what I was going to say. Clinton will still likely win Florida,
but the margin will be much slimmer.

I think Obama has a pretty good chance of winning Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's in her own best interest to have a do-over
The demographics favor her and it removes the controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. She won't be able to duplicate a 50-33 win.... not with Edwards no longer on the ballot....
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. She might not even win, but she will get delegates in a state with a good chance to seize momentum
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:19 AM by andym
I think it's in her interest because the demographics favor her.

She has to gamble I think.

She may or may not do as well as the first time. She'll probably do less well (she could even lose, if Obama can successfully address the experience issue), BUT if she believes in her appeal to her core constituency, it's a battle she has to take.

If she wins again the benefit is three fold. First, she gets needed delegates. Second, she gets momentum late in the primary process, which may prove valuable in convincing the super delegates to choose her. Third, the controversy that may endanger a GE victory is eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. You mean FL instead of Ohio; first line.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 AM by Flabbergasted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Does Hillary not think she can win if the vote is redone?
You did mean Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary? A conniving cheater? Ya think??? n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. Don't understand...doesn't she think
she can win Florida with Obama's name on the ballot?

Hasn't hilary scraped all the scum off the bottom of the pond YET?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. There shouldn't be a do-over. Voters in both states should ask Dem leadership to resign
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:05 AM by zulchzulu
It sets a precedent in future primary seasons that states can break the Democratic Party rules and get away with having an election that the Democratic Party then has to pay for.

It should be up to the Democratic leadership in both states that made the decision to break the rules to RESIGN IMMEDIATELY. They broke the rules and they should pay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why are you folks so dedicated to either so as to lie for them?
Both sides keep posting Bush/Rove like manipulations of the truth ... and, for what?

Neither O or H will be able to 'deliver' us from the mess we're in.

It's sad to see so much money, energy, and hope wasted on propaganda from either side. Especially, as both have so little to offer real, average, hard-working folks and the country as a whole.

It will take much more than their status quo pandering and media savvy to save the majority of us from the future the corporations and countries holding the wealth/our debt hope us to have ... aka serfdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. HRC is saying let the votes count. What obama wants is a
damn caucus, but Senator Bill Nelson has already said there will be no caucus in Florida....So, it is either seat the delegates or we lose florida and michigan and mc cain becomes the winner....Select obama so he can lose it.....and then hrc can come back in 2012....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Are you FOR or AGAINST a new PRIMARY in FL and MI?

Not a caucus... I understand Hillary supporters' reluctance to have caucuses.


Are you against a FAIR primary with BOTH candidates on the ballot and BOTH being allowed to campaign in the states?


If you are against that, like your queen is... then don't whine to us about "disenfranchisement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. If you want to say what Obama wants, clarify.
You assume he wants a caucus?
Because I'm pretty sure he didn't say only a caucus. What I have heard them say that the only thing they're opposed to is seating the delegations based on the results of January’s primaries. They have no pushed for a caucus.

Hillary said today a caucus in not acceptable.


Either one is fine with me...and surely Obama. Even if he doesn't win either one he'll get enough to win the nomination.
Not sure Clinton campaign is doing their math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. She is conniving and self-absorbed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. Pathetic. She really is a Soviet Democrat.
If only she could arrange it so that the general election ballot read "Hillary Clinton" or "Hillary Rodham Clinton". Of course, she'd still find a way to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah
and Al Gore was a soviet Dem for wanting his votes in Florida counted, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Al Gore's was a LEGAL and SANCTIONED election.... Florida on Jan 29 was NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. You're wasting time. Clintonites don't believe in the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Again with the "rule of law"
second time tonight.

This isn't about laws. it's about arbitrary and changeable DNC rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Why didn't they just cancel the election then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. Now that Dean has offered it...no one in leadership wants it.
:evilgrin:

Interesting indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
28. Hope he does no reason for him not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Look
Hillary wanted a do-over when she thought that there wouldn't be a do-over. She was fine when it sounded like she was talking for the people....she didn't want disenfranchise them. Right.

Consider this....

She already considers Florida and Michigan wins for her. She talks about them as wins for her. She counts the delegates in her column.

Why the hell would she want to chance taking that away?

To quote Hillary Clinton..."they're just words".

Somebody step in and save this woman from herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC