Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can we not question Clinton's judgment if she think's McBombIran is qualified to be C-in-C?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:39 AM
Original message
How can we not question Clinton's judgment if she think's McBombIran is qualified to be C-in-C?
Is this the sort of decision-making prowess she wants to bring to the White House--the kind that endorses insanity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. She legitimized McCain - instead of saying he's a nutter, she said he's qualified.
TWICE. I still can't quite get my head around it. She does not have good judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe because on defense there's no difference bt them?
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 10:44 AM by soleft
:shrug:

IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. She's just trying to buttress the flimsy "more years in politics = superior experience" bullshit
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 10:50 AM by ResetButton
she's based her whole campaign on. Therefore, right before he died, Strom Thurmond was the most qualified to be CIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Which is why Bill was more experienced than Poppy.
Um, er,...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Does that include his years in the CIA?
Ha, nice pic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. 4 in House. 8 as Veep.
And more years in the CIA than is in his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. He IS qualified
The best choice no, but qualified yes.

Natural born American - check
Old enough - check
lived in the US of A at least 14 yrs - check
never been an impeached POTUS previously - check
hasn't been POTUS for 6 yrs or more previously - check


He's qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. ha! we're all qualified!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Anyone who meets that criteria is qualified
getting the job is another story. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, you guys have really been giving her a free pass until now.
Stop holding back. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. this, I take it, is the counterargument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. She's an idiot. She just made a huge strategic blunder by taking the fight
onto HIS field, without having a history of wise national-security decisions to shield herself and battle him with, should she become the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Exactly! War mongers love war mongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigAnth Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Does Hillary think that Bill was ready on day 1 back in 1992?
I find Hillary's positions to be highly self-serving and hypocritical. By any standards, back in 1992 George H. W. Bush had much more national security experience and was much more qualifed as Commander in Chief. I hope that the American people will see through her fear-mongering and phony arguements. And also, I don't think that being first lady counts for a hill of beans when it comes to credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bill was ready to answer 'the hot line' on day 1
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 11:00 AM by ResetButton
"Hey baby, you got a pretty voice, I'm pitching a pup tent, whatcha wearin?..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Apparently experience leads you to vote the war in Iraq and for bombing Iran.
Yeah just love that experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. As I've said before, she cares more beating Obama
Then she does about beating McCain.

IMHO, she's poisoning the well against Obama, so he'll lose and she can run again in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. If she gets the nod then McCain gets my vote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Holy shit, and the O. supporters were vilifying me for saying I would have to think about it...
...before voting for O. in November!

Pointing out that McC has governmental experience is somehow being a traitor to the party, but an outright endorsement of the enemy is okay?

Oh, yeah, I forget, you can vilify HC anyway you want because she stands in St. Obama's way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Excellent point! No way do we want "hot-head" McCain's finger on the "red button!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well, no. We don't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good point. All we need is a hot headed warmonger in the WH.
If that's Hillary's good judgment, she should step down before she embarrasses herself anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I hear ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC