Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Does Its Magic: Hillary’s 3% Exit Poll Margin Morphs to 10% in the Vote ( TIA )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:27 PM
Original message
Ohio Does Its Magic: Hillary’s 3% Exit Poll Margin Morphs to 10% in the Vote ( TIA )
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 05:20 PM by tiptoe


Ohio Does Its Magic: Hillary’s 3% Exit Poll Margin Morphs to 10% in the Vote

TruthIsAll      http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/OhioOldReliable.htm

Ohio just did for HRC what it did for Bush in 2004. Bush's Ohio vote share exceeded his "pristine" exit poll share by 5.4%.
Clinton's 2-party vote share exceeded her unadjusted (9pm) exit poll share by 3.6%   (55.2 – 51.6%).

Clinton won the 2-party vote by a 10.6% margin  (55.3 – 44.7%).  But her unadjusted exit poll margin was just 3.4%  (51.7 – 48.3%).
As is always the case, the Final Exit Poll was adjusted to match the vote count.
For comparison, the Unadjusted and Final Exit polls are provided below.

The final Zogby Ohio pre-election poll had the race dead even. The poll was confirmed by the unadjusted exit poll, just as it was in New Hampshire and in 2004 in the battleground states. John Zogby must be one awfully frustrated pollster. Since 2000, election fraud has consistently skewed his projections. But he never mentions the F-word.

It should be obvious by now to anyone who has analyzed pre- and post-election polling data since 2000 that primaries and general elections have been silently screaming election fraud. But the main stream media and the politicians keep blinders on the public while catapulting the misinformation that the pre and post-election polls are wrong and the vote count is correct. They never mention the probability of election fraud as the root cause of the polling discrepancies. Like 9/11, election fraud is a” third-rail” subject not to be openly discussed, much less investigated by the media.

Tommy Heinrich was a NY Yankee baseball player who played right field with Joe DiMaggio in center. His nickname was "Old Reliable" because he could always be counted on to deliver in the "clutch". Ohio is "Old Reliable" for the Republicans. It will deliver its phantom votes in the clutch for John McCain just like Diebold's CEO and Secretary of State Blackwell delivered them for Bush in 2004.

Stalin said it: It's not who votes. It's who counts.


      Clinton  Obama   Margin
Vote
   55.23   44.77    10.46
EPoll  51.65   48.35     3.30

Shift   3.58   -3.58     7.16

The probability that the 3.6% shift was due to chance is 1 in 4,436 (assuming a 2% exit poll margin of error).
Assuming a 3% MoE, the probability of the shift is 1 in 103.

Calculate the probability of a 3.58% 2-party shift from the unadjusted exit poll to the vote.
Assume a 2-3% margin of error (MoE) range.

Use the Excel normal distribution function:
Probability = Normdist (0.5165, 0.5523, MoE/1.96, true)

MoE        Prob      1-in-

2.0%      0.02%    4,436
2.2%      0.07%    1,403
2.4%      0.17%      578
2.6%      0.35%      287
2.8%      0.61%      164
3.0%      0.97%      103


Ohio Primary
March 04, 2008
1612 Respondents



Final Exit Poll 9pm Exit poll
Mix Clinton Obama Mix Clinton Obama

Gender
Male          41%    50%    48%           41%    47%    52%
Female        59%    57%    41%           59%    54%    45%
Total               54.1%  43.9%                51.1%  47.9%



Education
No College    62%    58%    40%           63%    55%    44%
College Grad  38%    47%    51%           37%    44%    55%
Total               53.8%  44.2%                50.9%  48.1%



Education
No H.S.        5%    N/A    N/A            5%    N/A    N/A
H.S. Grad     25%    65%    33%           25%    63%    36%
College       32%    52%    47%           33%    49%    51%
College Grad  22%    50%    50%           22%    45%    55%
Post Grad     16%    42%    53%           15%    42%    56%
Total               50.6%  42.8%                48.1%  46.3%



Region
Cuyahoga      17%    47%    52%           15%    41%    59%
Northeast     30%    61%    37%           35%    61%    39%
Central       22%    55%    42%           21%    48%    51%
Northwest     10%    54%    43%           11%    44%    55%
Southwest     21%    49%    51%           18%    49%    51%
Total               54.1%  44.2%                51.2%  48.4%



Income
Under 100k    81%    54%    44%           82%    51%    48%
100k +        19%    50%    50%           18%    46%    54%
Total               53.2%  45.1%                50.1%  49.1%



Under 50k     44%    56%    42%           44%    53%    46%
$50k +        56%    52%    47%           56%    49%    51%
Total               53.8%  44.8%                50.8%  48.8%



Income
0- 15k         8%    50%    49%            8%    47%    52%
15-30k        15%    60%    36%           15%    58%    41%
30-50k        21%    55%    43%           21%    51%    48%
50-75k        23%    55%    45%           23%    51%    49%
75-100k       15%    50%    47%           15%    49%    50%
100-150k      11%    55%    45%           11%    51%    49%
150-200k       4%    N/A    N/A            3%    N/A    N/A
200k +         4%    N/A    N/A            4%    N/A    N/A
Total               50.8%  40.7%                 48%    45%



Party ID
Democrat      69%    56%    42%           69%    53%    46%
Republican     9%    49%    49%            9%    45%    55%
Independent   22%    48%    50%           22%    46%    54%
Total.              53.6%  44.4%                50.7%  48.6%



Ideology
Liberal       40%    53%    46%           41%    49%    50%
Moderate      46%    56%    42%           46%    53%    46%
Conservative  14%    48%    48%           13%    46%    53%
Total               53.7%  44.4%                50.5%  48.6%

Final Exit Poll 9pm Exit poll
Mix Clinton Obama Mix Clinton Obama




Race
White         76%    64%    34%           75%    61%    38%
African-Amer  18%    13%    87%           19%    11%    89%
Latino         4%    N/A    N/A            4%    N/A    N/A
Asian          1%    N/A    N/A            1%    N/A    N/A
Other          1%    N/A    N/A            1%    N/A    N/A
Total               51.0%  41.5%                47.8%  45.4%



Religion
Protestant    56%    55%    43%           56%    52%    48%
Catholic      23%    63%    36%           22%    59%    40%
Jewish         2%    N/A    N/A            2%    N/A    N/A
Other          7%    N/A    N/A            7%    N/A    N/A
None          13%    45%    52%           13%    43%    55%
Total               51.1%  39.1%                47.7%  42.8%



Sex and Race
White Men     32%    58%    39%           32%    55%    44%
White Women   44%    67%    31%           44%    66%    34%
Black Men      7%    15%    85%            7%    13%    87%
Black Women   11%    12%    88%           11%     9%    91%
Latino Men     1%    N/A    N/A            1%    N/A    N/A
Latino Wom     2%    N/A    N/A            2%    N/A    N/A
All Other      2%    N/A    N/A            2%    N/A    N/A
Total               50.4%  41.8%                48.5%  45.1%



Size of Community
Urban         26%    44%    55%           27%    39%    60%
Suburban      63%    56%    42%           64%    54%    46%
Rural         10%    70%    26%           10%    67%    32%
Total               53.7%   43.4%               51.8%  48.8%



When Did You Decide Your Vote?
Today         12%    54%    43%           11%    52%    46%
Last3 Days     9%    63%    37%           10%    59%    41%
Last Week      9%    54%    43%            9%    51%    48%
Last Month    23%    46%    54%           24%    42%    58%
Before        46%    57%    41%           46%    54%    45%
Total               53.8%  43.6%                51.1%  48.1%



Which Candidate Attacked Unfairly?
HRC           24%     8%    91%           26%     7%    93%
Obama          8%    92%     8%            8%    91%     9%
Both          29%    68%    29%           28%    66%    33%
None          35%    67%    32%           34%    65%    34%
Total               52.5%  42.1%                49.7%  45.7%




Final Exit Poll 9pm Exit poll
Mix Clinton Obama Mix Clinton Obama




Age 
17-29         16%    35%    61%           16%    32%    67%
30-44         28%    50%    50%           28%    46%    54%
45-59         33%    57%    42%           34%    54%    45%
60+           23%    69%    28%           23%    67%    31%
Total               54.3%  44.1%                51.8%  48.3%



Age 
17-24          7%    29%    70%            7%    24%    75%
25-29          8%    41%    54%            8%    38%    60%
30-39         17%    49%    51%           17%    45%    55%
40-49         21%    52%    48%           22%    48%    52%
50-64         32%    60%    37%           32%    58%    40%
65+           14%    72%    26%           13%    70%    29%
Total               53.8%  43.5%                50.6%  47.4%



Were Debates Important to Your Vote?
Yes           73%    52%    47%           74%    49%    51%
No            18%    55%    38%           18%    54%    43%
Total               47.9%  41.2%                46.0%  45.5%



More Qualified to be Commander in Chief?
HRC           60%    87%    11%           57%    86%    13%
Obama         37%     3%    97%           40%     3%    97%
Total               53.3%  42.5%                50.2%  46.2%



Was Gender of Candidate Important to You?
Yes           17%    60%    40%           17%    57%    43%
No            82%    53%    45%           82%    50%    49%
Total               53.7%  43.7%                50.7%  47.5%



Most Important Issue
Economy       59%    55%    43%           58%    52%    47%
Iraq          19%    49%    50%           19%    47%    53%
Health Care   19%    56%    42%           19%    52%    47%
Total               52.4%  42.9%                49.0%  46.3%




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not 'hip' to vote for Hil. Never has been, so she's always had more votes than polling pts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is a great example of a lot of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. And of course we all know...
... that in all the other states the exit polls exactly mirrored the actual vote count.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama wins, it's the will of the people. Hillary wins, it's stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. It's the latest version of "Bush wins, it's stolen. If Kerry wins, it's the will of the people."
We're all guilty of it at times. Sometimes we believe what we really, really want to believe. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Except there's a mountain of evidence that says Kerry won.
We may be guilty of considering evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. people lied?
the horror of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another possibility is that people

are reluctant to admit they didn't vote for the black man, lest they be accused of being "racist."

So they say they voted for Obama, though they actually voted for Clinton.

If exit pollers ever came to my precinct, I'd probably lie to them just on general principles because I don't think exit poll results should be used while the election is still going on, nor do I think they should be used to "prove" election fraud since voters can so easily lie about how they voted. I do think election fraud occurs but the GOP owns the voting machines.


Some people have the quaint idea that their vote is a private matter.

I was actually taught that in school.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sampling problems
Sometimes the supporters of one candidate are more eager to answer exit polls than supporters of the other candidate. That may have been the case in 2004 as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Curious isn't it?
Just like New Hampshire. Soon EMR experts on CNN will start jawing about the "Hillary effect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Its Zogby, the Walmart of pollsters
You get what you pay for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for the info!
The dopes here who don't think this is important (or don't understand it), are going to be shocked, SHOCKED, when their candidate (if she gets the nomination) mysteriously loses to a Bushite in November, against all inferential evidence--which is really all you have in a vote counting system run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations, with virtually no audit/recount controls.

Then, maybe, after three straight Diebolded elections (yeah, including the one that produced a Congress that re-funded and escalated the war on Iraq, in the teeth of SEVENTY PERCENT opposition to it by the American people), we will get Democratic Party support for TRANSPARENT vote counting, the most fundamental condition of democracy.

And then, maybe, some day--after we start electing real representatives of the people--we'll get our country back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course if evil-doing "dictator of the month",

Hugo Chavez, won an election after the exit polling showed he was loosing, you can bet that the asshat chimp in chief and his neocon, media asskissers, mouthpieces and facilitators would be braying over the airwaves non-stop about how Chavez was caught red handed fixing elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. that's actually what happened, except the exit polls were more corruptible
A U.S. pollster whose firm wrongly predicted President Hugo Chavez would lose a recall referendum on Thursday defended the exit poll, which has landed in the center of a national controversy.

The poll by Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates has become such a hot issue because the opposition, which spent more than a year mounting the drive to force Chavez from office, insists it shows the results from Sunday's referendum itself were fraudulent.

Former President Jimmy Carter and the secretary-general of the Organization of American States, Cesar Gaviria, both monitored the vote and endorsed the referendum results.

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/08/20/Worldandnation/American_backs_his_Ve.shtml


To answer that question, we must go back to August 15, 2004. That was the day of the referendum to decide whether Chávez should be thrown out of office midway through his presidential term. Whilst voting was still taking place, a New York-based firm called Penn, Schoen & Berland produced an exit poll which claimed that Chavez had lost by 18 points. The opposition went wild and declared victory. When the actual result was announced — Chavez had won by 18 points in an internationally certified free and fair election — the opposition claimed fraud, citing as evidence this exit poll.

Penn, Schoen & Berland say that their exit polls have a margin of error of under +/- 1%. So how could they have been off by a margin of 36 percentage points? Simple. They had subcontracted the conduct of the poll to a US government funded, anti-Chavez group called Sumate, whose leader participated in the 2002 coup. The poll was entirely bogus, but it served the purpose of casting a shadow over the democratic credentials of the Chavez presidency and the left in general.

http://www.greenleft.org.au/2006/692/35996

In conclusion, the evidence gleamed from the press releases from PS&B and Súmate as well as anecdotal evidence all point towards some serious problems in this exit poll. Some of the problems are beyond repair at this point (e.g. poor quality fieldwork by the interviewers), while others can be used to address academic investigations (e.g. re-weighting the data). There is a lot less than meets the eye here, and it seemed absurd to hold this exit poll up as the standard of truth versus an audited vote count.

http://www.zonalatina.com/Zldata373.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. and it is striking what DIDN'T happen
I have to admit, I actually never thought of this before. I know that the Bush administration didn't actually make a big deal about the exit polls even in Ukraine 2004, so it never occurred to me to point out that it didn't make a big deal about this exit poll in Venezuela either. Which was wise: that would not have been a winning argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Notice who the pollster was
More evidence about whose side Hillary's campaign is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R.
I hope TIA's health is good these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. There's those magical election numbers again!
I just never figured it would start in the primary. :(




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. How well do Obama's numbers match the exit polls in states he won?
Not a leading question; I don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. it varies
In CT (which was actually close), the initial exit poll tab was close to the final official returns; in IL, the exit poll tab showed Obama doing about 6 points better on the margin.

On Super Tuesday, the initial exit poll tabs showed AZ, MA, and NJ all very close; they weren't. But in all three of these states, pre-election polling indicated that they wouldn't be.

For that matter, in Ohio, the last eight polls averaged an 8-point lead for Clinton. TIA cherry-picked the one he liked.

So, for people who actually want to know whether the exit polls were accurate, there is reason to think they weren't. But TIA has never been big on following evidence wherever it leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Super Tuesday: Strange Obama-to-Clinton Exit Poll Shift / Beyond Reasonable Doubt: NH Primary rigged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. did it ever occur to you
that it would be more socially usefully for you to help TIA to improve his work, instead of uncritically linking to it?

Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I think it's pretty good as it stands.
Too bad more people don't get to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. so far, in almost three years at DU...
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 06:26 AM by OnTheOtherHand
I can count the number of people who think they understand TIA's posts well enough to argue his side on my... palms? Simply put, I don't think anyone believes this stuff, (ETA: if belief entails the ability to argue for one's position).

Just one point here: Election Defense Alliance retracted its claim about the "exactly opposite" percentages in New Hampshire a few days after making it, because it was demonstrably wrong. That annihilates TIA's article about New Hampshire. Does he live in a hole or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. My GOD! Election fraud in Ohio is unprecedented!
Scratch that, wait, in fact, it is precedented...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. What possible motivation could the Rethugs have for wanting Hillary as the nominee?
:eyes:

K&R&Bookmarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Democrats control the state machinery in Ohio now.
Unless you believe they are in on it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Really? In the red counties the Democrats are in control?
That's not what I heard, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. A high percentage of people dislike her, she motivates their dispirited base, clenis hatred
inflames the religious right, the religious right believes a woman's role is subservience, etc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. You're joking right?
Tell me you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Almost always.
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 06:13 PM by jgraz
The rolly :eyes: was the tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ohio, Bush Homeland
Bush family roots run long and deep in Ohio. is it no wonder that they also control the political machine there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. You know there is the possibility of sampling error in exit polling too.
I don't know why people don't understand this. I don't even believe in the 2004 vote fraud so I'm not going to believe in this. TIA's analysis was total garbage back then and it is now. He's always used bizarre assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. hello, fellow TIA admirer ;)
This sample is so small that we can't distinguish between random sampling error and bias -- but based on other results, I would expect some bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. I remember MSNBC saying that the percentage gap between both would close up
There was about a 14% difference and Chuck Todd was saying the big cities hadn't begun to even count yet and should close up this gap quite a bit. The thing is this never happened and nobody said a word. I myself had some suspicion because Cincinnati, Columbus and Cleveland which they were waiting on before calling this never did close up the gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. sure it happened
The final margin was about 10 points.

They couldn't predict how much it would narrow because, for a long while, they didn't have any votes to extrapolate from.

You can look at the returns from the big-city counties right now and see how the percentages look with and without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Cuyahoga County barely delivered any margin at all to Obama.
Franklin and Hamilton Counties came in pretty big for him, but that was pretty much it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. You lost Ohio - a major swing state by 10%
deal with it. Good god how so many Obama people ever had the nerve to call Clinton people crybabies and whiners when all I hear is crybabies about Ohio, whiners about SNL, and that non-stop "SAVE OBAMA - STOP THE PRIMARY!!" threads. The only time you guys seem to stop crying is to high five each other for a Wyoming Caucus where like 6000 people voted in a state that has almost zero democrats.

Grab a tissue and get over it...you lost Ohio fair and square.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. You've never been to Ohio, have you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. sure have - sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Then your wealth of experience should tell you
that Ohio's elections are corrupt as hell.

And if your experience doesn't tell you that, you might want to attend to Mr. Conyers, the GAO, and the horde of researchers that have published on the topic. LinkTv, fyi, is running their documentary tomorrow afternoon, 3pm Pacific time.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=election+fraud+Ohio&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. oh well there it is
Clinton didn't win by 10% and Obama actually won the race and is the greatest human alive. Glad you stepped up to the plate and showed that Ohio is a corrupt state and shouldn't be trusted or counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. That's what you do with fact. That's your problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. oh well there it is
that's what I do with facts. that's my problem. I'm sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
45. Well, heck, I'll kick it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
47. ...and kick it again, for those who may be trying to enjoy a weekend away from their computers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC