Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton says 'No political solution in Iraq.' ?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:47 PM
Original message
Clinton says 'No political solution in Iraq.' ?????
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 03:50 PM by RichardRay
Here's a link to another post. It quotes a transcript of Clinton's speech from earlier today.

Original Post

I read it, several times, and each time this statement jumped out at me:

“We can have hundreds of thousands of troops on the ground for a hundred years, but that doesn’t change the fact that there is no political solution to the situation in Iraq,” said Clinton.
(emphasis mine)

I tried to see some context that made it not say what it seems to say, but I can't find one. If it says what I think it's saying then Clinton is saying there is no political solution in Iraq; from that I guess I go to thinking that she either feels there is NO solution in Iraq, or that there is a military one, or that there is some other kind of an unspecified solution.

I replied in that post and haven't gotten a response, and this is so puzzling that I thought I'd try again.

Can someone parse this for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. it means the Iraqi Government is sttting on their lazy asses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. frankly, I think the blame the Iraqis for the mess that Iraq is in
is completely misplaced. We don't own it, but we sure as fuck broke it to smitereens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Hillary to bring troops home withing a year or as fast as she can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Isn't that a political problem?
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 04:20 PM by Drachasor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. she mis-spoke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing puzzling at all. Samantha Power says Barack's solution..
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 03:52 PM by barack the house
www.members.aol.com/cooolandrew2/outstanding.mp3

The Clintons aint wat they use to be. Nostalgia can be a dangerous thing.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's truth.
There is no military solution, we know that. And, there is no political solution. Nothing that a politician can do in Washington to "solve" the mess that is Iraq.

It is an Occupation that ends when we leave. No winning or losing, only ending it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agreed no military solution...
and there's no US political solution. But, the problem WILL be solved, in the long run, by the Iraqis. I have to believe the solution will be an Iraqi-led political solution of some kind. Probably NOT one led by the current regime in Baghdad, and perhaps not even one that leaves the 'country' of Iraq on the map, but it will be a political solution to a problem caused by post WW-II politics. We need to find a way out of the mess while doing as little further damage as we can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. It means that she doesn't intend to have a political solution.
She's a gun tote-in granny and loves her some war! Sorry the preacher stuff has sent me over the edge. I am certain that Hill is a fine Dem candidate but she does think that war is a solution. She spoke of Iran way back as well. No hope for anything but war there I am afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. What don't you understand??
Without a political solution in Iraq, nothing is going to change.

If the Sunnis, Shia and Kurds don't learn to live together, there is nothing we can do.

She is 100% correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's not what I read in the quote...
“We can have hundreds of thousands of troops on the ground for a hundred years, but that doesn’t change the fact that there is no political solution to the situation in Iraq,” said Clinton.


She seems to be saying that there is 'no political solution' in Iraq. That's what puzzles me. If there is no political solution, then what kind of a solution IS it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hillary is bought and paid that's the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They maylisten to a man with the middle anme Hussain though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yes. After all, we've given them the gift of freedom.
disguised as the curse of war. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wes Clark who's supporting/advising her said this on Morning Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. CLARK said that?
He's said the opposite for the last five years. Has he changed his position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why are you cherry-picking quotes from that article?
This is what comes immediately after she says that:

“Sen. McCain and President Bush claim withdrawal is defeat. Let’s be clear, withdrawal is not defeat. Defeat is keeping troops in Iraq for 100 years.”

Without a political solution, there is nothing - so we might as well withdraw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I don't believe I'm cherry picking anything
I provided a full quote and the original source of the quote. I added emphasis to the words in the quote that concerned me and ventured my own interpretation of the content, clearly labeled as such. I asked for clarification. In what I've read about the Iraq debate the usual dichotomy is 'political solution' vs 'military solution' I believe there is no other solution except a political one in Iraq - one that the Iraqis come up with on their own.

She seems to have said that there is 'no political solution' in Iraq, so what's her alternative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh God The Context Is So Obvious. Do You Really Not Know Or Are You Just Posting Bullshit For Sake
of inciting people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. it's for an ass cover, for IF she wins the nom
she'll do the Pelosi 'waaaah, I didn't think this would be so haaaard, those repugs won't let us DO anything, wahhhh!"

or Clinton will say - I told you so, it won't be easy. There is NO SOLUTION, military or political, so let's just stay there indefinitely like my good friend McCain says. too bad, so sad. let the buyer beware. ahahahahahahah! suckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. She's repeating her neocon programming from Will Marshall
co-founder of the Democratic Leadership Council/DLC, President of the DLC's leading think tank the Progressive Policy Institute/PPI, PNAC letter signatory...

Will Marshall Right Web profile
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1295.html

PPI was funded 2000-2002 by the neocon Milwaukee-based powerhouse The Bradley Foundation

Grants to support PPI (Media Transparency)
http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientgrants.php?recipientID=2355

There are many more answers to be found in this active GD thread

"Inconvenient truths about the New Democrats, the Third Way, Democratic Leadership Council, etc."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2973191

If you (or anyone else) want to focus on Hillary&Iraq, review this active WillyT GD-P thread

"As War Neared in 2003--Hillary Was Silent"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5108062
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. She's saying that the only "solution" to this mess is to LEAVE
We can't solve it militarily, and we can't solve it politically on the ground. It's a lost cause, basically.

I for one agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I guess I see that as a political solution...
Leaving, that is. I agree that we cannot force an Iraqi solution. Every time we try, we just dig ourselves (and the Iraqis) in deeper. BUT, figuring out how to get troops out of Iraq, what to do with the pieces we leave behind (what do we do with all the hardware we've flooded into the country in the last five years?) and getting it proposed, supported and implemented in this country IS a political problem and will require a political solution.

Is that what she's rejecting? Or, do I have a wider interpretation of the term 'political solution' than is appropriate in this context?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. She's stated many times that she'd start withdrawing the troops soon after taking office
And even alluded to that in the next sentence after the one you quoted, so I think it's safe to assume that she means there is no political solution that will "win" the war. All there is left to do is withdraw the troops, because this can't be solved politically or militarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 04:20 PM by Drachasor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Most smart people are saying that. WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. OK - The excercise in concluded.
She appears not to have said that.

I went back to the original post and checked to be certain (for the fourth time) I'd not read it incorrectly. Then I went to alternate transcript sources it appears that the transcript posted was in error. Her statement was:

“We can have hundreds of thousands of troops on the ground for a hundred years, but that doesn’t change the fact that there is no military solution to the situation in Iraq,” said Clinton.


Sturm und Drang - 'surfermaw' gets the prize for coming the closest to explaining it to me. Thanks, it was your post that set me on the track to finding out what was going on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. Either she's being honest, accidentally being honest, or misspoke.
Where is she wrong?

There is nothing we can do militarily or politically other than get the hell out of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hillary is BFEE, RichardRay-she speaks the same kind of code as Donald Rumsfeld. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Be prepared for the big back away from Obama also, so just remember
when he starts backpeddling about bring troops home per earlier statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC