Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's preacher uses "hate speech." HRC voted to authorize an illegal war that's killed thousands.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:11 PM
Original message
Obama's preacher uses "hate speech." HRC voted to authorize an illegal war that's killed thousands.
And I'm honestly supposed to give a shit about Obama's fucking pastor? Are you people shitting me????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thousands? Try a million. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm using a conservative estimate.
Somehow, that doesn't make it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. How many times has Obama voted
to fund that war that has killed thousands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That war wouldn't exist if senators like HRC hadn't authorized it
would it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Let's see - how many did authorize it?
Like over 70? And please: http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/03/obama_quote_tha.php

In a recent interview, he declined to criticize Senators Kerry and Edwards for voting to authorize the war, although he said he would not have done the same based on the information he had at the time.

''But, I'm not privy to Senate intelligence reports,'' Mr. Obama said. 'What would I have done? I don't know. What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made.''

It's a rhetorical situation and any logical person would see that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. So because Obama didn't criticize Kerry & Edwards I can't criticize HRC?
HRC fucked up. Period. And she's the one running on her experience. If that's part of her experience, I'll go with the speeches guy. The fact that he said "the case was not made," EVEN IF HE DOESN'T MEAN IT, is better than what she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
60. Wow -
As I said, it's a rhetorical situation. Nothing to do with what was done. And with the case you are making, I'll go with neither, thank you. Obama is running on "Judgment" - They said Bush had judgment in spades in 2000. What part of his judgment made him think that voting to fund the war would have ended it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I'd fund it too.
People need to get over this delusion that defunding the war will end it. Vietnam was a different era and the people in charge at the time were not the utter sociopaths who hold the reins now. George Bush can get almost unlimited credit to continue military actions (look up the Feed and Forage Act when you get a chance) and BushCo has no qualms about leaving our kids over there with no armor, or food, if necessary. While blaming the Democrats for it the whole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GhostofSandpiper Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Opinionated black preachers are the definitive issue of our time
The war in Iraq and the economy...


Kid's stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Ha!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why are you letting Bush off the hook
for being a War Criminal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm not, but HRC gets to be responsible for her vote.
Besides, if HRC was dumb enough to get duped by Bush, then she's not even qualified to be a janitor, much less president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. You are
if you keep insisting that the IWR was a vote to authorize the War.

Bush did not keep his end of the bargain inherent in the resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. HRC is a lawyer by trade
and lawyers know how to read extremely complex briefs with 75 subclauses and probe them for every last loophole, including ones that can be exploited to allow unelected presidents to go to war.

Anyone with half a brain who saw the 2000 election theft knew that Bush was not to be trusted in any way, and when HRC was handed the IWR to vote on, her lawyer brain should have analyzed it for any loophole that would have given Bush even an inch of leeway. She didn't. This means she was negligent, or she's not intelligent, or she was being an opportunist.

I know that the IWR was not a piece of paper with two checkboxes marked "Go to war" or "Don't go to war," by the way, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Got news for you
Bush was going to invade Iraq anyway --We ALL knew it.

The IWR was a last ditch effort to attempt to get the Inspectors back in to PREVENT (if possible)Bush from invading.

It was a stupid vote, however --because Bush was ALWAYS going to invade, and he didn't need the IWR to do it.

He was planning it before he was even appointed to Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Then why didn't she vote "no"?
If he was going to invade anyway, why not vote "no"?

Could it be because she wanted to look "tough" for her 2008 presidential campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. She wanted to get the Inspectors back in
Did you ever read her floor speech before the vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. I've read it many times.
But I thought speeches don't matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. They matter when they are for a purpose
and they matter when joined with action.

They do not matter when they exist in a vacuum and are used to 'prove' some sort of superior Judgement.

Obama's 2002 speech proves nothing about how he would have voted, and in fact is remarkably similar to speeches given by both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry some weeks beforehand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. And then they went ahead and voted "yes" anyway.
Isn't that something?

Besides, are you saying that Obama's antiwar speech from 2002 is proof that he would have voted for the IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. I'm saying it doesn't prove he would have voted no
In fact --he is on record, for example, for saying he knew that voting with the GOP on the Schiavo matter was Constitutionally wrong --but he did it anyway.

He is on record as saying he doesn't know how he would have voted regarding IWR.

His speech is -just a speech, and no doubt a political move to gain support in a very liberal district.

His speech in comparison to his record seems almost jarring in it's difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
64. Yes, we all knew it. That doesn't make her vote for IWR any less
irresponsible. It was not stupid, it was cynical and criminal on her part. How can you make excuses for her or any legislator that enabled this butchery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And the enablers? Are they war criminals too?
Damn right they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The onus goes on Bush but Hillary should take responsibility for her part. Thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. The IWR Killed a million and displaced 5 million.
But the pastor is the asshole. HA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's amazing, isn't it?
How many people are dead because of the pastor's "hate speech"?

That's right, NONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Yet he's the asshole and she's the hero.
What kind of fucked up world is this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. actually
you don't know that.

Ripples in a pond --and as Obama will tell you --Words Matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. ROFLMAO!
If I accept your premise, that Wright's speeches may have indirectly caused the deaths of even, let's say, five thousand people, that's still a fraction of the number of people killed in Iraq.

Words matter. So do votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. You appear to be under the delusion
That Hillary alone voted the troops into battle.

She didn't even partially do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. She's only 1/76th responsible.
And that's more than enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Your interpretation
of the IWR vote --like many on DU, is simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. That's some argument.
But let's keep it simplistic anyway:

IWR > Obama's pastor

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. I actually don't have a problem with Wright
In fact --I seem to have less of a problem with Wright than Obama does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. 85 year old Bear Stearns fails because of "free market" thinking ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheZug Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. in part because of Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Someone is reading my mind...
K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here Here!
or is that Hear Hear?
Anyway, great point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Black preacher makes some white people uncomfortable vs a million dead brown people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Pastorgate is the most important issue of our time
If Obama is elected white people will be thrown in concentration camps. Obama really hates white people. Without his preacher being caught on tape telling us so we would have been fooled. Now we know. You still have time to save yourself from them taking over the country.


:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. And Obama voted to fund its continuation
And I am supposed to get excited by your sanctimony?

Question is - how do we undo the mess Bushco got us into?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. It'd be more stupid to leave irresponsibly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Funding was the right thing to do--many smart people in Congress
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 08:25 PM by wienerdoggie
believe that defunding is a terribly risky and undesirable way to end a conflict. In Vietnam, it was a true last resort, AFTER most of our troops had left--certainly it wouldn't have been done at the height of the conflict. It's not a good idea for many reasons, not just politically.

on edit--ask Hillary why she kept the funding going, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
25.  "Squawk! I'm A Parrot!" "Squawk! IWR IWR" "Squawk! She Voted She Voted IWR IWR" "Squawk"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. The Iraq war is a bigger and more relevant issue than Obama's pastor.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. A grave, once-in-a-lifetime life or death historical decision, and she
blows it. OK, then say you blew it. Don't just say, well, I'll never do THAT again, based on what I know now--that's not leadership, that's chickenshit excuse-making from someone who can never admit to making a mistake. Say you deeply regret it--not because you were caught being wrong, and you like to be right, but because your decision played a part in unleashing hell on innocents and in harming American interests and security. Admit that you have a part, however small, in the fiasco that ensued, admit that it makes you feel bad to see so much bloodshed that should never have happened. Explain why you made that bad decision (without blaming Condi Rice or Colin Powell or George Bush or anyone else), and say how you learned from it, how your mindset has changed, how your perspective on the purposes of waging war has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. She's not supporting it now, that's what counts
She shouldn't have voted for the war, but she is against it now and wants the troops out. It's the present that counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. No, judgment counts. Sorry, you don't just get to wake up and divorce
yourself from all your prior bad decisions. Nice try, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
53. I don't think
Good Judgement is Obama's strong suit.

He should get back to his Unity message --oh wait --that won't work either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. I don't believe her.
And the past counts. The only people who say it doesn't count are the people who don't want it held against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. Now that 75% of the country is against it. HRC always does
what is politically expedient. Obama was outspoken against the war while the majority of Americans favored invasion. See the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I agree, OP. And its millions, by the way. Soon to be 5000 of our own troops. Just horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. We gave them the "gift of freedom". Why do you hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
42. And obama has voted to fund this war
and don't kid yourself. IF he was a Senator at the time...he would have voted right alongside his mentor Lieberman for the IWR.
He has the luxury of standing outside looking in to create any record that he wanted on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. The war that HRC voted for, you mean.
And you have no idea how he might have voted. He might have voted for it. He might not. You can't know. What's indisputable is the fact that HRC did vote for it.

We can go with what you guess might be true, or we could go with the senate record. Your call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. Neither do you.
He has no moral ground to stand on the outside looking in creating a false record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Even if he's lying his ass off he's in higher moral standing than HRC.
He "might" have voted for the war. She DID vote for the war.

I'll make this simple for you. Let's say I ate a cheese sandwich. Then let's say that, for whatever reason, you didn't eat a cheese sandwich. What we extrapolate from this is that I ate a cheese sandwich.

Now let's mix it up a little. Let's say Senator X votes for a war. Let's say Senator Y, for whatever reason, didn't vote for it. What we extrapolate from this is that Senator X voted for the war.

OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barb in Atl Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Perhaps...
But if his actions are as politically motivated as you are suggesting, wouldn't he have also been one of the the legion screaming for war? Really, EVERYBODY was gung ho for it - or at least, those were the only voices that were allowed through the filter.

Speaking against the invasion of Iraq could have ended his career right there, doncha think? If he was bold enough (and perhaps, honestly, moved enough) to speak out against invasion before he'd made it out of the state legislature, maybe, just maybe he would have been bold enough to speak out once he was in the U.S. Senate and relatively safe (incumbents have an advantage, you know).

But we'll never know for sure now, will we? We only have his words spoken at the time. That's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Nobody knew...or cared...who Barack Obama was outside of his own district in Illinois
so it is a moot point.
His word is surely good enough for YOU...but which "word" are you going to take?
He has said several different things at different times...which obviously would allow him to cherry pick the MOST CORRECT response he wanted released.
He went to an Anti-War rally and pandered there. Big shock. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barb in Atl Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. Actually, that IS the point
By coming out and speaking against the war, he could have remained a "Nobody" outside of his district in Illinois forever. That could have stopped any and all aspirations to national office. But he said it anyway.

Obviously we have differing points of view and those POV's are going to color how we perceive "what could have been". There is no way to know definitively, one way or the other.

So....

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
48. She has a lot of blood on her hands.
He knows a preacher that occasionally gets overly melodramatic during his sermons.

There is no comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
56. "Illegal war?" Which specif law did it violate?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danzo Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Sorry, But Obama ADMITTED....
...that if he were in the Senate, he might have voted the same way that Hillary did:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-jim-mcgovern/senator-obamas-curious-c_b_72577.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
62. but but but ...
Pasture(sic)Wright ordered GOD to damn America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
65. And as Hillary would say
Speeches are just words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
66. I know, I agree. I'm very depressed about how this has all turned out.
I thought this time would be different, but of course, it's not. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC