Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Powell Says Kerry Wrong About Blood For Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 11:55 PM
Original message
Powell Says Kerry Wrong About Blood For Oil
Kerry has said "no young American in uniform ought to ever be held hostage to America's dependence on oil from the Middle East." Powell, in an interview with Westwood One Radio, said President Bush was not "sending our troops overseas for oil" but to put a stable democracy in place in Iraq that would provide oil to the world market.

Powell said he supported an energy task force appointed by Vice President Dick Cheney, and he criticized Congress for not passing an energy bill. "What we need is a more sensible energy policy and that is what the president has been calling for the three years of this administration," Powell said.

The Cheney plan favors oil and gas drilling on public land and rejuvenating nuclear power. It provided the starting point for wide-ranging energy legislation submitted to Congress.

If Congress passed Bush's energy bill, the United States would be less dependent on overseas energy, Powell said. "We could do many more things to conserve energy and make useless dependent on overseas oil," he said. But, Powell said, because of Americans' desire "for different kinds of automobiles" — a reference to the huge gas-guzzlers that many Americans drive — the United States is importing close to 58 percent of its petroleum needs.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=15&u=/ap/powell_kerry


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. That pic of Russert questioning "invisible Powell" is awesome!



nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. It wasn't blood for oil, but blood for fat defense contracts
The Iraq venture was merely a ruse to shift public funds to Halliburton. The logical (and craven) result of outsourcing functions and tasks previously performed by military personnel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Powell criticizes Kerry...
...then goes on to demonstrate just WHY Kerry is right to say what he said.

Kerry: "no young American in uniform ought to ever be held hostage to America's dependence on oil from the Middle East"

Powell: President Bush was not "sending our troops overseas for oil" but to put a stable democracy in place in Iraq that would provide oil to the world market

<whaaa?!?!>

Ok, let's apply this same kind of thinking to another statement, and craft the "Powell response".

D-Man: "driving drunk impairs one's motor skills, and is dangerous to oneself and others on the road"

the Powell response: "I'm not saying that driving drunk is wrong, but reducing the number of people that drive drunk will reduce traffic fatalities"

what a dumbass...resign Powell. You've already lost your credibility and dignity, all that's left is for you to walk away with your freedom partially intact...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like Marching Orders again
After the whole Wake Forest speech and the Russert interview it looks like Bush and his crew straightened ol' Powell out. Touting their lines about the bogus energy bill and democracy in Iraq after he himself said the reasons for war were a sham.

Tighten the noose ol' Georgie...

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hi DrFunk
I'm not quite sure why the misadministration doesn't just give up attempting to twist the whole oil thing, even their own following flock believes it's about oil and doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Powell Admitted On Meet The Press That He Was Hoodwinked By Chalabi
Appearing on Meet the Press, Powell acknowledged--finally!--that he and the Bush administration misled the nation about the WMD threat posed by Iraq before the war.

Specifically, he said that he was wrong when he appeared before the UN Security Council on February 5, 2003, and alleged that Iraq had developed mobile laboratories to produce biological weapons. That was one of the more dramatic claims he and the administration used to justify the invasion of Iraq. (Remember the drawings he displayed.) Yet Powell said on MTP, "it turned out that the sourcing was inaccurate and wrong and in some cases, deliberately misleading."

Powell did not spell it out, but the main source for this claim was an engineer linked to the Iraqi National Congress, the exile group led by Ahmed Chalabi, who is now part of the Iraqi Governing Council.

http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=1442



Chalabi on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC