If Richardson had gave his word not to endorse Obama, I wonder why did he get visited 5 times.
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:29 AM
Original message
If Richardson had gave his word not to endorse Obama, I wonder why did he get visited 5 times.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM by cooolandrew
Smells like somethink hinky to me.
Neshanic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. He likes the attention. He the Gov of New Mexico for goodness sake.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:31 AM by Neshanic
NDambi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. but Clinton camp side Richardson' endorsement wasn't important..then why so upset
islandmkl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's norman hsu, not hsi...
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. That smell is the crap in your diaper
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Awww thanks mom. We'll forget he ran against Clinton the once presumptive winner.
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good point. Smells hinky to me, too. The fact that the
Clintons are trying to ruin this man's reputation by claiming he lied is despicable to me. If lies were a barometer, they'd be retired.
Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I tell you what - if they came to me, I'd have a tape recorder running
the whole time ! Rather Bush-esque, isn't it. Anyone who disagreed with them got pilloried. Richard Clark and Joe Wilson immediately come to mind.
NDambi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Didn't the Clinton camp say Richardsons' endorsement wasn't important or had no impact? If that is the case why go to him five times to ask for it and why did Bill get so upset about his endorsement of Obama? Man, they talk out both sides of their necks in that circle jerk of a campaign.
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. desperation. they were still after him
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. I could care less if he lied...Bill Clinton has some nerve calling out somebody who lied.
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's a question of character and credibility
we know who has it and who doesn't
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
Glad to see you got your daily talking points. Bake
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Edited - as I have been corrected - Clinton was not convicted of perjury
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:26 PM by Debi
He was only disbarred and fined and admitted to knowinly giving misleading testimony. (that was the agreement he struck in order to avoid criminal prosecution) Much better....
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I stand corrected - Clinton wasn't convicted - he was just disbarred
and had to pay a $25,000 fine and admitted to 'knowingly giving misleading testimony'in an agreement in order to avoid criminal prosecution. Thank you for reminding me of that.
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's been noticed that Clinton's had only ONE significant SD endorsement since Richardson...
...came out for Obama. So much for minimizing the Governor's prestige and importance that has to sting...
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. As far as I know, Clinton's had ONE superdelegate endorse her since Super Tuesday!
Murtha's the only one that comes to mind. There might be a handful of others... does anyone know for sure? Whatever shifting argument the Clintons use (there's a new one every day), it's clear that it's not working with superdelegates.
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Here's a great site - go to the bottom and it gives up to date changes
writes3000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hmmm, maybe Superdelegates don't like being bullied. n/t
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:04 PM by writes3000
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Apr-03-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tricky things, those facts! Like numbers, they'll sneak up on you!
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Sat May 04th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.